7 cm vs. 5 cm Pancreatic Stents for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High-risk Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
800
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is estimated to be 10% to 15% in high-risk patients. Current guidelines recommend using pancreatic duct stent (PDS) for PEP prevention in high-risk patients, but it is not clear whether stent length will affect the effect of PEP prevention. The longer PDS will remain in the pancreatic duct for a longer period of time, thereby ensuring prolonged decompression with subsequent lowering of the risk for PEP. Findings from two retrospective studies showed that longer PDS was more effective in reducing the risk of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia and the frequency of PEP compared with the shorter PDS. We conducted this trial to test whether 7cm PDS was superior to 5cm PDS in PEP prevention in high-risk patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2020
CompletedOctober 30, 2019
October 1, 2019
1 year
October 18, 2019
October 28, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
The diagnosis of PEP was established if there was new onset of upper abdominal pain associated with an increased serum amylase level of at least 3 times the upper limit of normal range at 24 hours after the procedure, and hospitalization for at least 2 nights.
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Moderate to severe PEP
14 days
Other complications of ERCP
14 days
Study Arms (2)
5cm PDS group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients in this group receive 5cm 5-Fr PDS.
7cm PDS group
EXPERIMENTALAll patients in this group receive 7cm 5-Fr PDS.
Interventions
All patients without contraindications should be administrated with rectal indomethacin within 30 min before ERCP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Un-intentional pancreatic duct cannulation:
- or more times;
- time with more than 10 minutes cannulation.
- Double-wire technique;
- High-risk patients:
- met at least 1 of the major criteria
- Clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction;
- Pancreatic sphincterotomy
- Delayed precut sphincterotomy
- ≥ 8 cannulation attempts
- Pneumatic dilatation of an intact biliary sphincter
- Ampullectomy
- or met at least 2 or more of the minor criteria
- Age \< 50;
- Female;
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Therapeutic PDS;
- Acute pancreatitis within 3 days;
- With a history of pancreatic surgery or biliary-enteric anastomosis;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
- unwilling or inability to provide consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032, China
Related Publications (3)
Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L, Czako L, Gyokeres T, Manes G, Meier P, Poley JW, Ponchon T, Tringali A, Bellisario C, Minozzi S, Senore C, Bennett C, Bretthauer M, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rees CJ, Spada C, Valori R, Bisschops R, Rutter MD. Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2018 Nov;50(11):1116-1127. doi: 10.1055/a-0749-8767. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
PMID: 30340220BACKGROUNDSugimoto M, Takagi T, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Sato Y, Irie H, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Waragai Y, Takasumi M, Hikichi T, Ohira H. Pancreatic stents for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis should be inserted up to the pancreatic body or tail. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 14;24(22):2392-2399. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i22.2392.
PMID: 29904246BACKGROUNDOlsson G, Lubbe J, Arnelo U, Jonas E, Tornqvist B, Lundell L, Enochsson L. The impact of prophylactic pancreatic stenting on post-ERCP pancreatitis: A nationwide, register-based study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Feb;5(1):111-118. doi: 10.1177/2050640616645434. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
PMID: 28405329BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associated professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2019
First Posted
October 30, 2019
Study Start
October 15, 2019
Primary Completion
October 31, 2020
Study Completion
October 31, 2020
Last Updated
October 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10