Comparative Efficacy of IV Parecoxib vs Lidocaine in Reducing Propofol Injection Pain
Comparative Efficacy of Intravenous Parecoxib Versus Lidocaine in Reducing Propofol Injection Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Propofol is the most popular IV anaesthetic agent used for induction, however one of its known side effects is causing pain on injection, the gold standard method in preventing this pain is using lidocaine prior to injecting propofol. multiple drugs have been investigated to reduce the aforementioned pain, however there has been no study comparing lidocaine to parecoxib, an NSAID.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
August 11, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.4 years
July 31, 2025
August 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
incidence of pain on injecting propofol after receiving the treatment assigned.
immediately after injection of 50 mg of propofol.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Severity of pain.
immediately after injection of propofol.
Study Arms (2)
Parecoxib
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will receive IV parecoxib 40 mg (the standard full dose for an adult) diluted to a total volume of 5 mL with normal saline. The study drug will be injected into the IV cannula on the dorsum of hand \*\*with a tourniquet applied\*\* on the mid-arm (upper forearm) to occlude venous return. The tourniquet (elastic band) pressure will be just enough to distend veins (similar to when drawing blood) but not cause excessive discomfort. The parecoxib solution will be given over \~5-10 seconds. The tourniquet will remain in place for \*\*2 minutes\*\* after injection, then released. This technique of venous occlusion is borrowed from Bier block and previous studies, aiming to localize the drug in the vein for a short period to maximize local effect. then propofol will be administered.
Lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will receive IV lidocaine at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg (ideal body weight) up to a maximum of 50 mg, diluted to a total of 5 mL. The lidocaine will be given into the hand IV cannula \*\*with a tourniquet\*\* on the forearm, It will likewise dwell for 2 minutes under occlusion before tourniquet release. This tourniquet method for lidocaine is known to significantly improve its efficacy in preventing injection pain
Interventions
it will be given as a pretreatment prior to injection of propofol, with a tourniquet applied.
atients in this group will receive IV parecoxib 40 mg (the standard full dose for an adult) diluted to a total volume of 5 mL with normal saline.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients, ≥18 years
- ASA grading I-II
- Patients undergoing elective surgical procedures across all surgical specialties.
- Can speak Arabic or English
You may not qualify if:
- Difficulty in communicating.
- Liver Cirrhosis patients
- Renal failure or creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≤ 10umol/L,
- Known Lidocaine, parecoxib and/or propofol allergy.
- patients who are not using propofol for an induction.
- Any known contraindication to propofol, parecoxib or lidocaine. (this will include renal failure or cirrhosis of the liver as noted above)
- Patients refusing to be involved in the study.
- ASA(American society of anaesthesia) grading 3-6.
- Any patient that IV access cannot be established in the dorsum of the hand.
- Pregnant women.
- Patients with chronic pain disorders.
- Patients who received any form of analgesia within the last hour.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Walker BJ, Neal JM, Mulroy MF, Humsi JA, Bittner RC, McDonald SB. Lidocaine pretreatment with tourniquet versus lidocaine-propofol admixture for attenuating propofol injection pain: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820306da.
PMID: 21455088BACKGROUNDTan CH, Onsiong MK. Pain on injection of propofol. Anaesthesia. 1998 May;53(5):468-76. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00405.x.
PMID: 9659020BACKGROUNDGhai B, Makkar JK, Bala I, Wig J. Effect of parecoxib pretreatment and venous occlusion on propofol injection pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2010 Mar;22(2):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.03.011.
PMID: 20304348BACKGROUNDJalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC; Perioperative Clinical Research Core. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110.
PMID: 21406529BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2025
First Posted
August 11, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
August 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share