Efficacy And Safety Of Parecoxib 40mg vs. Ketoprofen 100mg In The Management Of Acute Renal Colic
NAP
A Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized, Multicenter Study Comparing The Analgesic Efficacy And Safety Of Parecoxib 40mg I.V. To Ketoprofen 100mg I.V. In Renal Colic
1 other identifier
interventional
340
6 countries
17
Brief Summary
This is a multicenter, randomized, double blind, double dummy, comparative, active-controlled trial designed to assess the analgesic activity and safety of intravenous doses of parecoxib 40 mg relative to intravenous doses of ketoprofen 100 mg for the treatment of renal colic in outpatients presenting at emergency room settings. This trial is designed to show non-inferiority of parecoxib related to ketoprofen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 pain
Started Jun 2007
Typical duration for phase_4 pain
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 28, 2013
CompletedJanuary 28, 2013
December 1, 2012
2 years
November 2, 2007
December 20, 2012
December 20, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Pain Intensity Difference at 30 Minutes (mPID30min)
mPID score was obtained by summation of product of length of the interval and difference in pain intensity (PI) divided by summation of length of the interval. Summation was done from zero to 30 minutes. Difference in pain intensity was obtained by subtracting the Pain Intensity Visual Analogue Scale (PI-VAS) at Minute 30 from baseline PI-VAS score. PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 millimeter (mm) line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. mPID score ranged from -100 to 100. Positive score= improved response in pain.
Minute 30
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Mean Pain Intensity Difference at 120 Min (mPID120min)
Minute 120
Time-specific Pain Intensity (PI) VAS Score
Baseline, Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120
Time-specific Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120
Baseline, Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Score Over 120 Min (TOTPAR120min)
Baseline through Minute 120
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 30, 120
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
I
ACTIVE COMPARATORKetoprofen plus placebo parecoxib
II
ACTIVE COMPARATORParecoxib plus placebo ketoprofen
Interventions
Ketoprofen 100 mg diluted in 100 ml of normal sodium chloride solution into the established patient's IV line by slow injection in a 20-minute period; and IV dose of 2 ml of normal sodium chloride solution as placebo for Parecoxib by bolus injection
Parecoxib 40 mg diluted in 2 ml of normal sodium chloride solution administered by bolus injection; and an IV dose of 100 ml of normal sodium chloride solution as placebo for ketoprofen administered in a in a 20-minute period
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient male or female with a confirmed diagnosis of acute renal colic with moderate to severe pain according to the VAS and Categoric pain scales
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has significant renal or hepatic conditions other than uncomplicated kidney stones.
- The patient has a history of clinically significant hypersensitivity to any NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, analgesics or sulfa medications which has a cross sensitivity to the medications used in this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (17)
Pfizer Investigational Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 20551-030, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14015-130, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048-900, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, 09715-090, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04262-000, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04321-120, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
Vila Mariana - São Paulo, São Paulo, 04122-000, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
Providencia, Santiago, RM, 7500921, Chile
Pfizer Investigational Site
Alajuela, Alajuela Province, Costa Rica
Pfizer Investigational Site
Desamparados, Provincia de San José, Costa Rica
Pfizer Investigational Site
San José, Provincia de San José, Costa Rica
Pfizer Investigational Site
Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Pedro Sula, San Pedro Sula, Honduras
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lima, Lima Province, L 31, Peru
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lima, Lima Province, L27, Peru
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
PR at all time points, proportion of participants with \>= 1 grade improvement in PR 30 min were replaced by PR at 30 and 120 min; number of participants with response in PI included; time to RM reported as number, due to change in planned analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2007
First Posted
November 5, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 28, 2013
Results First Posted
January 28, 2013
Record last verified: 2012-12