Hybrid Early Intervention for Infants at Risk of Cerebral Palsy
Investigation of a Hybrid Environmental Enrichment-Based Early Intervention Approach for Infants at Risk of Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and caregiver acceptance of the Homeostasis-Enrichment-Plasticity (HEP®) Approach, a novel early intervention based on the environmental enrichment paradigm, applied as a hybrid model for infants at risk for cerebral palsy (CP). The effects on functional goals, development, and parental well-being will be examined. The intervention consists of weekly one-hour sessions for 12 weeks with 17 infants aged 4-10 months at risk for CP, identified via the Prechtl Assessment or brain imaging. Feasibility and acceptance will be assessed by a 24-item Likert scale. Developmental outcomes will be measured with GAS, Bayley-III, ISFT, and DASS-21.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 14, 2025
September 1, 2025
2 months
July 7, 2025
November 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility Questionnaire
A 24-item Likert-type questionnaire was developed by the researcher to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction level, and safety of the intervention. The questionnaire items were grouped under four main categories: feasibility (items 1-7), acceptability (items 8-12), satisfaction (items 13-19), and safety (items 20-24). The five-point Likert-type scale included response options ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
From July 2025 to November 2025
Other Outcomes (4)
Goal Attainment Scaling
From July 2025 to November 2025
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Third Edition (Bayley-III)
From July 2025 to November 2025
Test of Sensory Functions in Infants
From July 2025 to November 2025
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Infants at risk of cerebral palsy
OTHERThe HEP Approach utilizes key principles of enriched environment models and brain plasticity. The therapists and family collaborate during the intervention process to offer permanent, ongoing, personal ized environmental stimulation to promote the child's active exploration and participation. Acrucial component of the HEP Approach is enhancing parenting self-efficacy to create en riched environmental conditions in the home and on an ongoing basis across environments.
Interventions
The HEPApproach intervention and clinical reasoning process follow a systematic order based on the data-driven decision-making model. There are 11 phases to the HEP Approach process. Phase 1 involves referral to the program. Phase 2 includes a meeting with the family to introduce them to the HEP Approach. Phase 3 is a comprehensive assessment of the child and family systems. Phase 4 is the identification of family and child strengths and challenges based on the assessment. Phase 5 involves formulating hypotheses about how underlying factors or systems impact the child's challenge areas. Phases 6 and 7 include collaborative goal setting and outcome measure identification with the family. Phase 8 is intervention planning. Phase 9 implements the intervention through an individualized process that generally involves four steps that prioritize different areas of need (e.g., self-regulation and homeostasis of the child, adaptation of the physical and social home environment to support succes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants who meet the following criteria will be included in the study:
- According to the general movement assessment, babies from birth to the 8th week have poor repertoire, synchronized cramps or chaotic movement pattern, and the presence of abnormal fidgeting movements between the 6th and 9th weeks.
- A neurologist has detected the presence of abnormal brain imaging on magnetic resonance imaging or cranial ultrasound,
- Absence of congenital anomalies,
- The family agrees to participate regularly in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Major vision or hearing problems,
- Presence of any genetic syndrome or congenital anomaly,
- Medical conditions that prevent active participation in the study (such as oxygen dependence),
- Participation in other experimental rehabilitation studies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Sense On, Ltd.
Istanbul, Beykoz, 34810, Turkey (Türkiye)
Sense On
Istanbul, Beykoz, 34810, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2025
First Posted
August 11, 2025
Study Start
September 5, 2025
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion
November 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09