Usefulness of Intraosseous Anesthesia for Permanent Tooth Extraction Under GA in Pediatric Dental Treatment
The Effectiveness of Intra-osseous Anaesthesia in Reducing Immediate and Delayed Post-operative Complications Associated With the Extraction of First Permanent Molars Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators are doing a study to see if a new way of giving local anesthesia during dental surgery can help children feel better after having a tooth removed under general anesthesia (when they are fully asleep). Normally, dentists give numbing medicine that can leave the lips or cheeks numb. This sometimes causes children to bite themselves without realizing it, which can make them upset when they wake up. In this study, the investigators are testing a special technique called intra-osseous anesthesia, which numbs only the tooth and not the surrounding soft tissues. The investigators hope this will reduce pain after surgery without causing numbness or accidental biting. Children in the study will be randomly placed into one of two groups: one group will receive this special anesthesia before the tooth is removed, and the other group will not. Before and after the procedure, the investigators will ask some short questions and observe the participants to check for pain, anxiety, or confusion. The parents of the participants will also receive a short online questionnaire to fill out the day after the procedure. The goal is to find out if this method helps children wake up more comfortably, feel less pain, and avoid side effects. This could improve how dentists care for children during dental treatments in the future.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 14, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 5, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 6, 2027
October 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.7 years
July 8, 2025
September 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
postoperative delirium in the child (flowchart)
to investigate whether the administration of intra-osseous local anaesthesia (Quicksleeper 5, an electronically controlled intra-osseous anaesthesia injection system) to children during general anaesthesia prior to the extraction of a first permanent molar (FPM) has an effect on immediate and later postoperative delirium in the child. Postoperative delirium will be assessed 5 min after spontaneous eye opening using a validated flowchart
5 minutes after spontaneous eye opening
Pre- and postoperative pain in the child (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS)
to investigate whether the administration of intra-osseous local anaesthesia (Quicksleeper 5, an electronically controlled intra-osseous anaesthesia injection system) to children during general anaesthesia prior to the extraction of a first permanent molar (FPM) has an effect on immediate and later postoperative pain in the child. Pre-and postoperative pain will be assessed at a fixed time after the procedure (after 120 minutes) using the validated VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) scale. Upon arrival at the hospital, the preoperative VAS will be taken. The scale consists of a line of numbers from 0 (left side of the line) to 10 (right side of the line). The higher the number, the more pain, so a worse outcome.
Preoperative: upon arrival at the hospital Postoperative: after 120 minutes
Pre- and postoperative pain in the child (Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability Scale)
to investigate whether the administration of intra-osseous local anaesthesia (Quicksleeper 5, an electronically controlled intra-osseous anaesthesia injection system) to children during general anaesthesia prior to the extraction of a first permanent molar (FPM) has an effect on immediate and later postoperative pain in the child. Pre-and postoperative pain will be assessed at fixed times after the procedure (after 10/30/60/120 minutes) using the validated FLACC (Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability Scale) scales. Upon arrival at the hospital, the preoperative FLACC will be taken. The scale consists of 5 scores assigned by an observer based on child's behavior/attitude. The sum of these determines the pain. 0 is no pain, 10 is intense pain. The higher the score, the outcome is worse.
Preoperative: arrival at the hospital, postoperative: after 10,30,60,120 minutes
Pre- and postoperative anxiety in the child (CFSS-DS - Children's Fear Survey Schedule - Dental Subscale)
to investigate whether the administration of intra-osseous local anaesthesia (Quicksleeper 5, an electronically controlled intra-osseous anaesthesia injection system) to children during general anaesthesia prior to the extraction of a first permanent molar (FPM) has an effect on immediate and later postoperative anxiety in the child. Postoperative anxiety will be assessed at a fixed time after the procedure (after 120 minutes) using a validated scale (CFSS-DS - Children's Fear Survey Schedule - Dental Subscale). The scale consists of 15 questions with a score from 1 till 5. A score of 15 in total means no anxiety, a higher score means more dental anxiety/fear, so a worse outcome.
Preoperative: upon arrival at the hospital Postoperative: after 120 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
presence of postoperative side effects related to local anesthesia
10 minutes up to 24 hours 10, 30, 60, 120 minutes after waking up (VAS - Visual Analogue Scale, FLACC - Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability, CFSS-DS- Children's Fear Survey Schedule - Dental Subscale questionnaire). After 24 hours: QoR-15
Other Outcomes (1)
Possible influence of the child's gender, site of extraction (maxilla or mandible/left or right)
up to 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
intra osseous administration of local anesthesia during general anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALIntra osseous administration of articain 4% 1/100 000 during general anesthesia for the extraction of a first permanent molar. The administration will be done with Quicksleeper 5.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONNormal procedure: no local anesthesia for the extraction of a first permanent molar during general anesthesia
Interventions
Intra osseous administration of articain 4% 1/100 000 during general anesthesia for the extraction of a first permanent molar. The administration will be done with Quicksleeper 5.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Children between 6 and 12 years old, belonging to the category of ASA I or II according to the 'American Society of Anaesthesiologists'
- Children who are cooperative enough for pre- and post-operative measurements
- Children who are not allergic to components of local anaesthesia
- Children who need at least one extraction of a FPM
- Children without a hematological condition
- Children who haven't taken painkillers 48 hours before the procedure
- Patients who need a treatment under general anaesthesia (nasal intubation) due to polycaries/fear/anxiety.
- Able to obtain a written consent from the parent/guardian after explaining the full details of the treatment procedure and its possible outcomes
You may not qualify if:
- \- Treatment with a laryngeal mask
- If a traumatic extraction is needed, this patient is excluded from the study
- Deviation in the pain relief protocol
- Parents/child don't speak Dutch
- Patients with missing data during the procedure/follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chloë Sterkens
Equal Lifelong Oral Health for All Research Group, Paediatric Dentistry
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Blinding is performed using a 6 digit code generated randomly using www.random.org. This code shall be used in all the patients files and shall only be known to the trial administrator. It is a double blind study in which the operator knows whether she is giving intra-osseus anesthesia (articaine) or not, but the patient and the evaluator of the pre- and post- operative scales will not know if the patient got local anaesthesia or not. SR has the excel file with the results of the block randomisation and key for blinding (pseudonymization). Allocation concealment will be performed by with the sealed envelope technique.SR is independent of the study results. He has no access to the results of the patients.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2025
First Posted
August 7, 2025
Study Start
August 14, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 5, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 6, 2027
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The IPD must be shared as anonymized or pseudonymized information. Data transfer must be conducted under Ghent University Hospital conditions, with legal experts drafting and reviewing the agreement (https://hiruz.be/cu/). Additionally, any data containing personal information requires approval from the Ethics Committee before transfer.