Comparison of Double Lumen Tube Location Verification Techniques in Single Lung Ventilation

NCT07107893 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 2024-KEAK-01
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 93
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare auscultation, fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and video double lumen tube (VDLT) double lumen tube (DLT) location confirmation techniques in terms of intraoperative tube location confirmation time, number of tube dislocations, correction time of dislocations, FOB usage rates, lung deflation quality, postoperative sore throat, presence of hoarseness and cost in thoracic surgery patients undergoing one lung ventilation (OLV).

Conditions

Lung Cancer; Lung Diseases

Keywords

Double lumen tube with video; Single lung ventilation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• verification of tube location

  The primary endpoint is the identification of a method that allows the quickest confirmation of double-lumen tube location after intubation and possible intraoperative location changes.

  during surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• evaluation of complications

  during surgery

Other Outcomes (1)

• cost effectiveness

  during surgery

Study Arms (3)

grup I

Group with confirmed tube location by auscultation

Grup II

Group with confirmed tube location by fiberoptic bronchoscope

Grup III

The group in which double lumen tube with video was used

Device: double lumen tube with video

Interventions

double lumen tube with video DEVICE

Methods used to confirm tube placement in one-lung ventilation: auscultation, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and video to evaluate double-lumen tube use

Also known as: fiberoptic bronchoscope

Grup III

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 84 Years
• Sex: all
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Ninety-three patients who would undergo thoracic surgery with single-lung ventilation at the Health Sciences University Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic were evaluated for suitability.

You may qualify if:

• Patients who will undergo TAV and be placed in the lateral position.
• Patients with ASA scores of I-III.
• Patients aged 18-84.

You may not qualify if:

• Patients undergoing emergency surgery
• Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) IV and above
• Patients with anticipated difficult intubation
• Patients requiring intubation with a right thoracic duct (CLT)
• Patients with more than three intubation attempts
• Patients who refuse to participate in the study
• Patients who will undergo TAV but will not be placed in the lateral position (sympathectomy)
• Patients with uncontrolled metabolic disease
• Mentally retarded patients
• Patients under 18 or over 84
• Patients with tracheal or airway abnormalities
• Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Kayseri City Hospital: lead

Study Sites (1)

Kayseri Şehir Hastanesi

Kayseri, Kocasinan, 38080, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms; Lung Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract Neoplasms; Thoracic Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Respiratory Tract Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE CONTROL
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER GOV
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: assistant doctor of anesthesiology and reanimation

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 17, 2025
• First Posted: August 6, 2025
• Study Start: January 16, 2025
• Primary Completion: April 15, 2025
• Study Completion: April 30, 2025
• Last Updated: August 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Locations

TU (1)