Attentional Focus in Single-Leg Squat for Ankle Sprain
Effects of Single-Leg Squat Exercises With Different Attentional Focus Techniques on Plantar Pressure Distribution and Posterior Chain Muscle Activation in Individuals With Unilateral Ankle Sprain
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study investigates the acute effects of single-leg squat exercises conducted under different attentional focus strategies (internal, external, and no focus) on plantar pressure distribution and posterior chain muscle activation in individuals with a history of unilateral ankle sprain. The study aims to determine whether external focus improves neuromuscular efficiency and postural control compared to internal or no attentional focus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2025
CompletedAugust 6, 2025
August 1, 2025
Same day
July 9, 2025
August 5, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Muscle Activation (%MVIC)
Measured via sEMG for Gluteus Medius, Biceps Femoris, Lateral Gastrocnemius, and Peroneus muscles during single-leg squats under each attentional focus condition.
Immediately post-intervention in a single session.
Center of Pressure (COP) Path Length
Postural control was assessed immediately after each intervention using a pedobarographic platform. Participants stood barefoot on the affected leg for 30 seconds in a standardized posture (hands on hips, eyes open). The primary outcome in this measure is the COP path length, which represents the total displacement of the pressure center during the trial. Longer COP path lengths indicate greater postural instability. Data were sampled at 100 Hz and analyzed using standardized software to evaluate the immediate effects of attentional focus strategies on postural stability.
Immediately post-intervention in a single session.
COP Ellipse Area
In the same testing conditions as described above, the COP ellipse area was measured. This reflects the 95% confidence area of sway, providing a spatial measure of postural control. Larger ellipse areas denote impaired balance and increased sway. This variable was computed using pedobarographic data sampled at 100 Hz and processed with standardized software.
Immediately post-intervention, in a single session.
Study Arms (3)
Internal Focus Condition
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are instructed to focus on their own body movements during the single-leg squat task. Examples of internal focus cues include verbal instructions such as "contract your glutes" or "keep your knee aligned." This condition is designed to direct the participant's attention to specific muscular or joint movements involved in the task. Session Length: Each participant completes 3 sets of 8 repetitions on the affected side. Rest Period: 1 minute between sets. Data Collected: Surface EMG (Gluteus Medius, Biceps Femoris, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Peroneus) and pedobarographic parameters during the movement.
External Focus Condition
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are instructed to focus on the effect of the movement in the environment. External cues include statements such as "push against the floor" or "drive your foot downward to move the platform." The goal is to direct attention away from the body and toward the movement outcome. Session Length: 3 sets of 8 repetitions on the affected side. Rest Period: 1 minute between sets. Data Collected: Surface EMG and pedobarographic data.
No Focus Condition
EXPERIMENTALParticipants perform the same single-leg squat task without receiving any specific attentional focus instruction. They are simply asked to perform the exercise naturally, as they normally would. Session Length: 3 sets of 8 repetitions on the affected side. Rest Period: 1 minute between sets. Data Collected: Same neuromuscular and plantar pressure data.
Interventions
Administration: Participants were instructed to focus on specific muscular or joint movements during single-leg squats (3 sets of 8 repetitions on the affected side, 1-minute rest between sets). Verbal cues included "contract your glutes" or "keep your knee aligned." Data Collected: Surface EMG (Gluteus Medius, Biceps Femoris, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Peroneus) and pedobarographic parameters.
Administration: Participants were instructed to focus on the environmental effects of single-leg squats (3 sets of 8 repetitions on the affected side, 1-minute rest between sets). Verbal cues included "push against the floor" or "drive your foot downward." Data Collected: Surface EMG (Gluteus Medius, Biceps Femoris, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Peroneus) and pedobarographic parameters.
Administration: Participants performed single-leg squats naturally without specific attentional instructions (3 sets of 8 repetitions on the affected side, 1-minute rest between sets). Data Collected: Surface EMG (Gluteus Medius, Biceps Femoris, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Peroneus) and pedobarographic parameters.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy individuals aged approximately 18-25 years
- History of unilateral ankle sprain
- Ability to perform single-leg squat exercises
- Willingness to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Acute musculoskeletal injuries preventing participation
- Neurological or neuromuscular impairments
- Uncorrected visual impairments
- Recent surgery or conditions precluding safe exercise
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gülhane Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Fakültesi, Application Laboratory, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Although participants and intervention providers were not masked due to the nature of attentional focus instructions, the outcomes assessor was blinded to the type of attentional focus condition applied during each trial. The assessor responsible for analyzing the sEMG and pedobarographic data was not present during exercise implementation and was unaware of the group assignments. Data files were coded and randomized before analysis to minimize detection bias and ensure objective evaluation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2025
First Posted
August 6, 2025
Study Start
October 10, 2024
Primary Completion
October 10, 2024
Study Completion
May 12, 2025
Last Updated
August 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data will not be shared publicly due to participant confidentiality and institutional data policy.