Effects of Neurocognitive Training on Chronic Ankle Instability
The Effects of Neurocognitive Training on Pain, Proprioception, Injury Anxiety, and Functional and Neurocognitive Performance in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of neurocognitive training on pain, proprioception, injury-related fear, functional, and neurocognitive performance in athletes with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Materials and Methods: A total of 30 athletes with CAI, with a mean age of 11.10±1.06 years and residing in Balıkesir, were included in the study. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups using simple randomization: the intervention group (n=15) and the control group (n=15). Two participants from the control group were excluded from the final analyses due to missing post-intervention assessments. The intervention group received a neurocognitive training program conducted twice a week for four weeks, following an initial familiarization week. The training was progressively administered on flat ground, balance mat, BOSU, and inverted BOSU. Both groups were evaluated before and after the 4-week intervention using the following measures: the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI), the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), pain intensity, proprioception, fear of re-injury, Y Balance Test (YBT), Side Hop Test, Reactive Balance Test (RBT), and Upper Extremity Choice Reaction Time Test. Results: The results were analyzed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2025
CompletedJune 4, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.2 years
May 17, 2025
May 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Functional Ankle Instability Assessment Using the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Questionnaire (IDFAI)
The IDFAI is a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 9 items designed to identify the presence and severity of functional ankle instability. Scores range from 0 to 37, with higher scores indicating greater instability. A score above 11 suggests the presence of instability. Scores are unitless numeric values representing the severity of symptoms and frequency of ankle sprains.
from the beginning of the study until the end of the 4th week
Functional Ankle Instability Evaluation Using the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
The CAIT is a self-assessment tool with 9 items measuring subjective ankle instability. Scores range from 0 (severe instability) to 30 (no instability). A score of 27 or below indicates functional ankle instability. The score is a unitless numeric value that reflects the level of perceived instability and risk of recurrent sprains.
from the beginning of the study until the end of the 4th week
Pain Severity Assessment-Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line ranging from "No pain" to "Worst imaginable pain." Participants mark their pain intensity on the line, which is measured in centimeters to quantify pain severity. This unitless numeric score reflects pain intensity at rest, during training, and post-training in ankles with instability history.
from the beginning of the study until the end of the 4th week
Other Outcomes (7)
Proprioception Assessment with Reposition Test (Ankle Dorsiflexion and Plantarflexion Angles)
from the beginning of the study until the end of the 4th week
The Sport Injury Anxiety Scale (SIAS)
from the beginning of the study until the end of the 4th week
Postural Stability Measurement Using Multireha Portable Balance Device (Sway in Millimeters During Single-Leg Stance)
from the beginning of the study until the end of the 4th week
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Neurocognitive training group
EXPERIMENTALNeurocognitive training is a program developed by incorporating motor learning strategies and cognitive challenges into neuromuscular training. Cognitive challenges included tasks requiring quick reactions, motor-motor or cognitive-motor tasks (dual-task), congruent and incongruent tasks, exercises combined with mathematical calculations (working memory), and response inhibition tasks.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group continued their training and no additional intervention was applied. Four weeks after their initial assessment, the same assessments were applied again with the study group.
Interventions
Neurocognitive training is a rehabilitation approach that, unlike traditional treatment methods which primarily focus on improving physical performance, emphasizes cognitive functions and psychometric skills. It is a program developed by integrating motor learning strategies and cognitive challenges into neuromuscular training. These cognitive challenges include tasks requiring quick reactions, motor-motor or cognitive-motor tasks (dual-task), congruent and incongruent tasks, exercises involving mathematical calculations (working memory), and response inhibition tasks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 10 and 18 years
- At least 2 years of active athletic participation
- History of ankle sprain with at least 2 inflammatory symptoms (e.g., pain, swelling)
- The most recent sprain occurred at least 3 months prior to the study start date
- A score of 11 or above on the FABIT (Simon et al., 2012)
- A score of ≤27 on the CAIT (Yin et al., 2022)
- Willingness to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- History of hip/pelvis, knee, or ankle surgery within the past year
- History of ankle fracture
- Diagnosis of a neurological disorder
- Presence of vestibular disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Balikesir University
Balıkesir, Bigadiç, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (19)
Mohammadi F. Comparison of 3 preventive methods to reduce the recurrence of ankle inversion sprains in male soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):922-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546507299259. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
PMID: 17379918BACKGROUNDWalker JM, Brunst CL, Chaput M, Wohl TR, Grooms DR. Integrating neurocognitive challenges into injury prevention training: A clinical commentary. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep;51:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 19.
PMID: 34153635BACKGROUND18) Tekin E, Ünver F. Klinik Nörobilişsel Fonksiyonel Performans Testleri: Geleneksel Derleme. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences, 2023;15(2).
BACKGROUNDTassignon B, Verschueren J, Delahunt E, Smith M, Vicenzino B, Verhagen E, Meeusen R. Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. Sports Med. 2019 Apr;49(4):601-619. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01071-3.
PMID: 30747379BACKGROUNDVerschueren J, Tassignon B, Verhagen E, Meeusen R. The interaction of acute physical fatigue with three traditional functional performance tests and the reactive balance test. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 May;49:188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
PMID: 33756239BACKGROUNDSimon J, Donahue M, Docherty C. Development of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI). Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Sep;33(9):755-63. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0755.
PMID: 22995264BACKGROUNDPlisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;4(2):92-9.
PMID: 21509114BACKGROUND13) Olsson L, Lund H, Henriksen M, Rogind H, Bliddal H, Danneskiold Samsøe B. Test-retest reliability of a knee joint position sense measurement method in sitting and prone position. Advances in Physiotherapy. 2004;6(1):37-47.
BACKGROUNDObuz T, Topcu ZG. The effects of exercises with a Pilates ball on balance, reaction time and dual-task performance of kindergarten children. J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Jun;11(8):583-593. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0293. Epub 2022 May 6.
PMID: 35514277BACKGROUNDLoizidis T, Nikodelis T, Bakas E, Kollias I. The effects of dry needling on pain relief and functional balance in patients with sub-chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(6):953-959. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181265.
PMID: 32310156BACKGROUNDHiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, Herbert RD, Kilbreath SL. The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022.
PMID: 16935061BACKGROUNDHertel J. Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain. Sports Med. 2000 May;29(5):361-71. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200029050-00005.
PMID: 10840868BACKGROUNDGribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley C, Caulfield B, Docherty C, Fourchet F, Fong DT, Hertel J, Hiller C, Kaminski T, McKeon P, Refshauge K, van der Wees P, Vicenzino B, Wikstrom E. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;48(13):1014-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
PMID: 24255768BACKGROUNDFong DT, Hong Y, Chan LK, Yung PS, Chan KM. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med. 2007;37(1):73-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737010-00006.
PMID: 17190537BACKGROUNDEngeroff T, Giesche F, Niederer D, Gerten S, Wilke J, Vogt L, Banzer W. Explaining Upper or Lower Extremity Crossover Effects of Visuomotor Choice Reaction Time Training. Percept Mot Skills. 2019 Aug;126(4):675-693. doi: 10.1177/0031512519841755. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
PMID: 31039674BACKGROUND4) Caz Ç, Kayhan RF, Bardakçı S. Spor Yaralanması Kaygı Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi. 2019;54(1): 52-63
BACKGROUNDCaldemeyer LE, Brown SM, Mulcahey MK. Neuromuscular training for the prevention of ankle sprains in female athletes: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2020 Nov;48(4):363-369. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2020.1732246. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
PMID: 32067546BACKGROUNDCain MS, Ban RJ, Chen YP, Geil MD, Goerger BM, Linens SW. Four-Week Ankle-Rehabilitation Programs in Adolescent Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability. J Athl Train. 2020 Aug 1;55(8):801-810. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-41-19.
PMID: 32577737BACKGROUND1) Akca NK, Aydın G, Gümüş K. Lomber disk hernili hastaların vücut mekanikleri bilgi düzeyleri ile ağrı şiddeti arasındaki ilişki. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2013;2(1):66-77.
BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2025
First Posted
June 4, 2025
Study Start
September 6, 2023
Primary Completion
November 1, 2024
Study Completion
March 3, 2025
Last Updated
June 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share