Comparison of Four-Channel Functional Electrical Stimulation vs. One-Channel Electrical Stimulation on Moderate Arm/Hand Paresis in Subacute Stroke Patients
MKES2
Efficacy of EMG-triggered Four-Channel Functional Electrical Stimulation vs. Cyclic One-Channel Electrical Stimulation on Moderate Arm/Hand Paresis in Subacute Stroke Patients. A Randomized Controlled Single Blinded Multicenter Study
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study will compare two treatments that may help participants recover after having suffered from stroke. Persons who experience weakness or paralysis of their arms/hands will be randomly placed in one of two groups. Each receives treatment five times a week for three weeks. One group will be treated with electrostimulation following a cyclic pattern (control treatment), the other group will be treated with electrostimulation triggered by nerve signals (i.e. stimulation starts when they deliberately try to move their arm (investigational treatment). Before and after the three weeks and additionally 12 weeks later, the ability to move the arm and hand will be documented with standardized tests.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2028
August 26, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.5 years
July 24, 2025
August 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) subscale Recovery
Scores between 0 and 100, higher meaning a better outcome
pre-intervention to 3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), subscale strength
pre-intervention to 3 weeks
Stroke impact scale (SIS) subscale Activities of Daily Living (ADL) / Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
pre-intervention to 3 weeks
Stroke impact scale (SIS) subscale mobility
pre-intervention to 3 weeks
Stroke impact scale (SIS) subscale hand function
pre-intervention to 3 weeks
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - upper extremity (FMA-UE)
pre-intervention to 3 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cyclic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (cNMES)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle channel cyclic neuromuscular stimulation used for the rehabilitation of moderate arm paresis
Electromyographic-triggered Multichannel Electrical Stimulation (EMG-MES)
EXPERIMENTALEMG-triggered, four channel neuromuscular stimulation used for the rehabilitation of moderate arm paresis
Interventions
Cyclic single channel neuromuscular stimulation is used to trigger repetitive muscular contractions
EMG-MES provides biofeedback by using electromyographic signals to trigger muscular contractions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First-time ischemic stroke with moderate arm paresis (Motricity Index - UE Sum-Score ≥ 40 ≤ 77 points) (Collin \& Wade, 1990)
- Early to late subacute phase (7 days - 6 months) (Bernhardt et al., 2017)
- Existing ADL ability before the event (ICF d5 self-care, d6 domestic life, extent of problem ≤1 points) (WHO, 2001)
- Age ≥18 - 99 years
- Signed and dated ICF before the start of any study-specific procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Implanted defibrillators, brain stimulators, pacemakers, medication pumps
- Therapy-resistant epilepsy
- Fever or infectious diseases
- Inflammatory or tumorous skin diseases in the stimulation area,
- Thromboses or vein inflammations
- Severe contractures of the affected extremity
- Wounds in the stimulation area
- Pregnancy
- Known allergic reactions to components of the investigational medical device
- Unstable psychological status
- Participation in other pharmacological clinical investigations within four weeks prior to enrolment
- Anything that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would place the subject at increased risk or preclude the subject's full compliance with or completion of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
KABEG Gailtal-Klinik LKH Hermagor
Hermagor, Carinthia, 9620, Austria
Ö. Landeskrankenhaus Hochzirl - Natters, Standort Hochzirl
Zirl, Tyrol, 6170, Austria
Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz
Linz, Upper Austria, 4021, Austria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2025
First Posted
August 1, 2025
Study Start
July 14, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Last Updated
August 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08