Aging and Task-specific Training to Reduce Falls
Aging and Task-Specific Training to Reduce Falls
2 other identifiers
interventional
315
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the effects of a novel task-specific balance training for reducing environmental falls in community ambulatory older adults who are at-risk of falling. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does task-specific balance training improve the ability to prevent falling when unexpected perturbations such as slips and trips occur, and/or improve balance control during self-initiated movements?
- Does task-specific balance training reduce real-life falls for 18 months after training? Researchers will compare task-specific balance training with conventional balance training and treadmill perturbation-based training to examine how this novel intervention compares to established interventions for improving balance. Participants who participate in the study will be asked to do the following:
- Complete a pre-training assessment of their balance control, and then be randomized to one of three training groups: 1) task-specific balance training, 2) treadmill perturbation-based training, and 3) conventional balance training
- Complete their assigned training protocol for 8 weeks (2x per week for a total of 16 sessions)
- Complete 2 post-training assessments of their balance control, the first being completed immediately after the training is completed, and the second being completed 18 months after the training is completed
- Wear a physical activity monitor for 18 months after completing the intervention to monitor their real life falls.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Aug 2025
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2029
July 30, 2025
July 1, 2025
3.8 years
July 23, 2025
July 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Reactive Stability
Center of mass position will be computed via Helen Hayes marker set using an eight-camera motion capture system and normalized by foot length. The center of mass velocity will be computed by the first order derivative of the center of mass position and normalized to acceleration due to gravity and participant's body height. Reactive stability will be calculated as the shortest perpendicular distance from the center of mass state (position and velocity) to the dynamic feasible theoretical boundary for loss of balance. Reactive stability values less than 0 indicate greater instability in the backward direction, while values greater than 1 indicate greater instability in the forward direction.
Immediately post and at 18 months
Vertical Limb support
Limb support will be quantified by change in vertical limb support upon the perturbation hip height. The hip height, Zhip, will be obtained as the vertical distance of the bilateral hip midpoint to the surface of the platform. Its positive direction is upward. Zhip will be normalized to bh. Change in Zhip at recovery foot touchdown and its minimum value post-perturbation from its pre-perturbation value will be extracted.
Immediately post and at 18 months
Laboratory falls
Falls on laboratory perturbation will be identified when the peak load cell force, which is attached to the full-body safety harness exceeds 30% of participant body weight. This will further be verified by video recordings.
Immediately post and at 18 months
Functional Gait Assessment
The functional gait assessment assesses dynamic postural stability and the ability to perform multiple motor tasks during walking, including 10 items where the researcher rates the participant's ability (from 0-3) to perform 10 different gait tasks, such as walking with the eyes closed, walking up stairs, and walking with changes in gait speed. We selected the FGA to determine training-induced improvements in volitional balance control as it highly mimics scenarios which might be encountered during ambulation in daily living.
Baseline, Immediately post and at 18 months
Real-life falls
Participants will be sent a weekly text inquiring if they experienced a fall or loss of balance that day. If participants respond "yes," they will be followed up with a phone call to inquire about fall details. Participants can also choose to mail in fall logs if they opt out of weekly messaging. Real-life fall data will also be supplemented with daily device-recording using wrist-worn ActiGraph Accelerometers.
Recorded retrospectively (12 months before training) and weekly for 18 months post-training
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)
Falls efficacy will be assessed using the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), which asks individuals to rate their level of confidence (0-100%) that they will not lose their balance while performing various activities of daily living, such as getting onto an escalator or reaching into a cabinet. An overall score of 0% indicates no confidence, while a score of 100% indicates complete confidence.
Baseline, Immediately post and at 18 months
Study Arms (3)
Task-Specific Balance Training
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the task-specific balance training group will receive 8 weeks of task-specific balance training that includes both functional tasks and predictable perturbations specific to slips and trips. Sessions will be completed 2x per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions total).
Treadmill Perturbation Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the treadmill perturbation training group will receive 8 weeks of training that includes exposure to slip-like and trip-like perturbations delivered via motorized treadmill. Sessions will be completed 2x per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions total).
Conventional Balance Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the conventional balance training group will receive 8 weeks of training that includes conventional exercises designed to improve balance control. Sessions will be completed 2x per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions total).
Interventions
Participants in the intervention groups will receive 8 weeks of task-specific balance training that includes both functional tasks and predictable perturbations specific to slips and trips. Sessions will be completed 2x per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions total).
Participants in the treadmill perturbation training group will receive 8 weeks of training that includes exposure to slip-like and trip-like perturbations delivered via motorized treadmill. Sessions will be completed 2x per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions total).
Participants in the conventional balance training group will receive 8 weeks of training that includes conventional exercises designed to improve balance control. Sessions will be completed 2x per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions total).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 90 years of age to include community dwelling older adults
- Understand English to ensure ability to safely complete study protocols
- Able to walk independently for 1 block and 10 meters without an assistive device to ensure ability to complete exercises and reactive balance assessments
- 'At-risk' adults: Participants who report experience of at least 1 fall in the past 12 months or participants who are categorized as at high fall- risk using our fall risk prediction model which can predict the risk of both slip and trip related falls.
You may not qualify if:
- Major surgery less than 6 months ago to avoid complications due to training
- Hospitalization less than 3 months ago to avoid complications due to training
- Taking any sedative drugs to avoid interference with training
- Acute or uncontrolled neurological or cardiopulmonary or musculoskeletal or cancer diagnosis to avoid complications due to training
- Have intact visual and auditory ability with or without corrective aids to avoid confounding effects on balance
- Severe osteoporosis measured by a score of less than negative two point five on heel bone density scan to avoid complications due to training
- Loss of sensation on monofilament test to avoid confounding effects on outcome assessments
- Cognitive impairment indicated by a score of less than 25 out of 30 on the mini mental state exam to ensure ability to follow instructions for safety
- Shortness of breath or uncontrolled pain higher than a three out of ten or inability to achieve age specified minimal distance on the 6 minute walk test for endurance to avoid complications due to training
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60622, United States
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2025
First Posted
July 30, 2025
Study Start
August 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2029
Last Updated
July 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07