NCT07094061

Brief Summary

This study seeks to understand individual differences in personality, brain function, and behavior. Study hypothesis: \- A stronger sign-tracking bias will be associated with a bottom-up processing style characterized by less adaptive attentional- and impulse-control as well as hyperactive reward processing, whereas a stronger goal-tracking bias will be associated with a top-down processing style characterized by strong attentional- and impulse-control as well as normative reward processing.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
294

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
17mo left

Started Oct 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress30%
Oct 2025Oct 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 3, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)QuestionnairesInterviewsBehavioral tasks

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Correlation between Pavlovian conditioned approach (PavCA) bias score (out-of-scanner) and composite cannabis use score

    PavCA bias score based on eye gaze during the Pavlovian conditioned approach task will be correlated with a cannabis use composite score based on the Substance Use History and Timeline Follow-Back.

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Correlation between PavCA bias score (out-of-scanner) and activation from the Cannabis Cue Reactivity Task (P-CAN)

    Baseline

Study Arms (1)

Assessment group

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: fMRIBehavioral: Questionnaires and surveysBehavioral: Behavioral tasks and eye tracking

Interventions

fMRIDEVICE

Participants will have an MRI to scan participants brains and will wear skin conductance electrodes on the hand and fill out questionnaires. Scanning will take approximately 90 minutes. While lying in the scanner, participants will be asked to perform some tasks. The tasks will be presented to participants visually on a screen in the scanner and eye movements will also be tracked during some of these tasks. Participants will respond to stimuli with button presses that are recorded by computer.

Assessment group

Participants will have multiple visits during this study and fill out various surveys at these visits.

Assessment group

Participants will perform behavioral tasks while having eye-tracking hardware monitor participants eye movements. A video camera will be used to record eye movements during the behavioral tasks.

Assessment group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 22 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • years old at baseline
  • Right-handed
  • Medically/physically able to give informed consent
  • English-speaking
  • Substance use is free to vary, but for participants with a history of substance use, ≥ 1 use of cannabis (including less than a full dose)

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute or chronic medical or neurological illness (e.g., diabetes, epilepsy, migraine)
  • History of psychosis in self or first-degree relative
  • Current treatment for substance use disorder
  • Current or past 6-month treatment with centrally acting medications (not including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication)
  • Intelligence quotient (IQ) \< 70
  • Lifetime history of head trauma with loss of consciousness \> 5 minutes
  • Reliance on glasses to be able to read small text at a distance of approximately 30 inches
  • Colorblindness
  • MRI contraindication (e.g., pregnancy, metal implants, claustrophobia) per protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Rachel Upjohn Building

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

RECRUITING

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Substance-Related Disorders

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSurveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TomographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Lora Cope, PhD

    University of Michigan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Paul Holdefer, MPH

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a longitudinal, repeated-measures, naturalistic study that will take place at the University of Michigan.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor Psychiatry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2025

First Posted

July 30, 2025

Study Start

October 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The scientific data collected will be preserved to enable sharing via Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)/National Addiction \& HIV Data Archive Program (NAHDAP). The demographic, clinical, and psychometric raw and composite data will both be preserved and shared, and respondent identifiers will be removed and maintained in a secure file for future contact purposes. Where applicable, sensitive data will be managed using ICPSR/NAHDAP's restricted data dissemination practices to ensure the data are kept confidential.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
The investigator/project team will contact ICPSR/NAHDAP 3-4 months before the required release date to determine if there would be lag time between data submission and ICPSR/NAHDAP's release of the data. ICPSR/NAHDAP permanently archives deposited files, supporting the data through changing technologies, new media, and data formats.
Access Criteria
The only requirements to access downloadable, de-identified data through ICPSR/NAHDAP are user registration and agreement to ICPSR/NAHDAP's Terms of Use, which require users to agree to not re-disseminate data, to use appropriate data citation, and to maintain human subjects protections. In the case of restricted-use, sensitive data, ICPSR/NAHDAP requires an application to access the data. As part of the application process, the data user's institution must enter into a Restricted Data Use Agreement with ICPSR/NAHDAP among other application components and data security requirements. Restricted data users are approved to access the data for a limited time period and in a controlled environment through the Virtual Data Enclave or a local computing environment that they secure themselves.
More information

Locations