NCT07084623

Brief Summary

Title: Comparing Two Methods of Topical Anesthesia for Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of two methods of anesthesia, pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL) and spray-as-you-go (SAYG), in reducing discomfort and improving operator comfort during fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Participants: 50 patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy Interventions: Patients received either PPL or SAYG anesthesia Outcomes:

  • Pain perception
  • Cough severity
  • Operator comfort
  • Procedure duration Results:
  • Both PPL and SAYG methods were effective in reducing pain and discomfort
  • No significant differences were observed between the two groups in pain perception, cough scores, or procedure duration
  • Operator comfort scores showed a trend favoring PPL, but the difference was not statistically significant Implications: Both PPL and SAYG methods can be effectively used for fiberoptic bronchoscopy, with potential implications for procedural efficiency and patient outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2022

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 4, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

June 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Patient discomfort and operator comfort during fiberoptic bronchoscopy

    This composite outcome evaluates three distinct parameters: 1. Cough severity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (100-mm scale where 0 mm indicates no cough and 100 mm indicates worst possible cough, with higher scores representing worse severity); 2. Pain perception assessed via the Faces Pain Rating Scale (11-point scale from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\], where higher scores indicate worse pain); and 3. Operator comfort rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Not comfortable to 4 = Very comfortable, with higher scores reflecting better comfort). All measures will be analyzed separately to compare PPL and SAYG techniques

    One year

  • Visual Analogue Scale

    Cough severity measured using 100-mm Visual Analog Scale where 0 mm = no cough and 100 mm = worst cough imaginable. Higher scores indicate worse cough severity.

    One year

  • Faces Pain Rating Scale

    Pain intensity measured using Faces Pain Rating Scale (0-10) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible. Higher scores indicate worse pain.

    One year

  • 4-point Likert scale

    Operator comfort assessed via 4-point Likert scale where 1 = Not comfortable, 2 = Slightly uncomfortable, 3 = Comfortable, and 4 = Very comfortable. Higher scores indicate better comfort.

    One year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Procedure duration

    One year

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Comparative effectiveness of PPL versus SAYG anesthesia in cough suppression using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    One year

  • Comparative effectiveness of PPL versus SAYG anesthesia in pain control using the Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS)

    One year

  • Comparative effectiveness of PPL versus SAYG anesthesia in operator comfort using the Operator Likert Scale

    One year

Study Arms (2)

Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received: 1. Standard sedation with midazolam (0.01 mg/kg IV); 2. 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx before bronchoscopy; 3. Additional 2% lignocaine spray (3 mg/kg): * 2-4 mL sprayed over vocal cords via bronchoscope working channel * Remaining dose as single bolus into larynx/trachea

Drug: Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL)Drug: Lignocaine Spray (Spray-as-you-go)

Spray-as-you-go (SAYG) Airway Anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received: 1. Standard sedation with midazolam (0.01 mg/kg IV); 2. 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx before bronchoscopy; 3. 2% lignocaine spray (3 mg/kg) during procedure: * Initial 2-4 mL sprayed over vocal cords * Additional doses in mainstem bronchi during scope advancement

Drug: Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL)Drug: Lignocaine Spray (Spray-as-you-go)

Interventions

Administration of 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx before the fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure, followed by additional 2% lignocaine spray according to body weight (3 mg/kg)

Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL)Spray-as-you-go (SAYG) Airway Anesthesia

Administration of 2% lignocaine spray via oral scope insertion during the fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure, according to body weight (3 mg/kg), with standard procedural sedation with midazolam and initial 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx for gag reflex suppression

Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL)Spray-as-you-go (SAYG) Airway Anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 72 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All consecutive patients indicated for diagnostic bronchoscopy, aged over 18 years, both genders (males and females), hemodynamically stable (defined as systolic blood pressure between 100 and 180 mm Hg), and sedated with an intravenous injection of midazolam at 0.01 mg/kg.

You may not qualify if:

  • Hypersensitivity to lignocaine, use of general anesthesia for the procedure or other emergency procedures, pregnancy, comorbidities such as heart failure, advanced chronic kidney disease stage 3-4, chronic liver disease, contraindications to sedation, and hypoxemia (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, SpO2 \< 92%)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tracheal Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Talha Mahmud, PhD

    Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore Pakistan.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Hira Ishtiaq, MD

    Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore Pakistan.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Pulmonology Department of Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March 2021 to March 2022.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Pulmonology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2025

First Posted

July 24, 2025

Study Start

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 1, 2022

Study Completion

March 1, 2022

Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations