Efficiency of Single Buccal Infiltration Versus Buccal and Intrapapillary Infiltration
Comparison of The Efficiency of Single Buccal Infiltration Versus Buccal and Intrapapillary Infiltration Using 4% Articaine During Extraction of Primary Maxillary Molar Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial Split Mouth Design Study
1 other identifier
interventional
25
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Everyday practice in dentistry is based on giving the painless injection and achieving adequate local anesthesia. Various techniques of reducing injection pain in children can be broadly categorized as psychological and physical. The psychological approach includes behavior management techniques, physical means and other recent techniques such as computer controlled anesthesia, electronic dental anesthesia, and so forth. However, none of these techniques have been successful in eliminating pain, fear and anxiety in children. Direct palatal injection technique is difficult to administer without significant pain or discomfort since there is little tissue space at these sites between the mucosa and the underlying periosteum. Studies conducted on indirect palatal injection technique (intrapapillary) revealed that it reduces the pain of palatal injection with the same efficacy of anesthesia during extraction. The desirable method to evade pain during palatal injection is just not to have one. Maxillary molars removal without palatal or multiple injections is possible due to relatively thin porous bone of posterior buccal maxilla that facilitates the diffusion of local anesthetic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 7, 2020
July 1, 2020
5 months
June 30, 2020
July 1, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Behavior pain assessment during anesthesia and extraction
FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale will be used for assessment during anaesthesia and extraction. This scale consists of 5 categories face, leg, activity, cry, consolabilty. Each category is scored on the 0-2 scale, which results in a total score of 0-10.
Intraoperative
Subjective self report pain assessment after anesthesia and extraction
Second subjective self report assesment will be done using Wong-baker scale after the anaesthsia and extraction.It consist of a set of cartoon faces with varying facial expression ranging from smile/laughter to tears.• Each face has a numerical value ranging from 0-5.
intraoperative
physiological record of pain after anesthesia and extraction
phisiological record including heart rate and blood pressure using an automatic blood pressure monitor.
intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
Single buccal infiltration using 4%articaine
EXPERIMENTALDryness the site of injection then application of topical anesthetic gel(2% benzocaine). Injecting by a small amount of solution in the superficial mucosa. After a few seconds, the needle was slowly advanced in the mucobuccal fold toward the apex of the molar and 1.8 ml of 4% articaine using short 30-gauge needle was slowly given. Subjective assessment of buccal and palatal soft tissue anesthesia will be assessed by inquiring about the area of numbness from the participant, no pain during pricking the palatal mucosa. The cases in which palatal anesthesia will not be reported by the patient will be given supplemental palatal infiltration with 0.2 to 0.3 mL articaine. After achieving adequate buccal and palatal tissue anesthesia, the tooth will be extracted under aspetic technique.
Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration using 4%articaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORDryness the site of injection then application of topical anesthetic gel(2% benzocaine) Injecting a small amount of solution in the superficial mucosa,then needle will slowly advanced in the mucobuccal fold toward the apex of the molar and 1.5 ml of 4% articaine was slowly given. The remaining 0.3ml solution will be given equally into the distal, mesial intrapapillary and palatal sites respectively until blanching of the palate is observed extending more than halfway along the palatal gingival margin. Subjective assessment of buccal and palatal soft tissue anesthesia will be assessed. After achieving adequate buccal and palatal tissue anesthesia, the tooth will be extracted under aspetic technique.
Interventions
painless technique for palatal anesthesia,single injection,single puncture given
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children from 6 to 9 years of age requiring extraction in two different quadrants in maxillary arch.
- Children who demonstrate positive or definitely positive behavior during pretreatment evaluation ranking 3 or 4 in the Frankl scale.
- Rating 3: Positive Acceptance of treatment; at times cautious; willingness to comply with the dentist, at times with reservation, but patient follows the dentist's directions cooperatively.
- Rating 4 :Definitely positive Good rapport with the dentists interested in the dental procedures, laughing and enjoying.
- Child must give assent prior to participation, as well as parental informed written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Medically and mentally compromised children.
- Children with a history of prolonged bleeding, platelet disorders, hypersensitivity,
- History of significant behavior management problems.
- Patients having active sites of pathosis in the area of injection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2020
First Posted
July 7, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2020
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- After completion of the study
- Access Criteria
- ClinicalTrials.gov
study protocol, informed consent, clinical study report