Recovery in Telling Life Stories
RETELL
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project tests the Recovery In Telling Life Stories (RETELL) intervention, aimed at supporting personal recovery in people with severe mental illness (SMI). While many of those with SMI experience symptom control, their quality of life often remains low due to social loss, negative self-perceptions, and identity-related challenges not addressed by standard treatments. Through a process of narrative repair, the RETELL intervention helps participants explore the personal consequences of mental illness while supporting the enhancement of narratives that strengthen identity and foster well-being. The intervention is delivered across 8-12 sessions and will be assessed for feasibility of both the intervention and study procedures. We will also explore its preliminary impact on recovery, quality of life, symptoms, functioning, self-stigma, and personality, using a multiple single-case A-B-A design. We expect the intervention and study procedures to show acceptable feasibility. We further hypothesize that participants' scores on recovery and well-being will be low at baseline, improve during the intervention, and remain higher after the intervention ends and at 3-month follow-up. This study will provide a foundation for future randomized controlled trials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2027
June 4, 2026
June 1, 2026
1.7 years
July 4, 2025
June 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Intervention feasibility: Treatment dropout rate
Treatment dropout is defined as participation in less than three out of the four therapeutic tasks of the intervention. Feasibility will be indicated by a dropout rate \< 30%.
Through intervention phase (T2), between 8-12 weeks
Intervention feasibility: Satisfaction with treatment (quantitative)
Participant-reported treatment satisfaction using the using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), a brief, standardized self-report measure designed to assess clients' overall satisfaction with healthcare or psychological services. It consists of 8 items rated on a Likert scale, covering aspects such as service quality, perceived helpfulness, and whether the service met the client's needs. Total score range: 8-32, with higher numbers indicating greater satisfaction. Feasibility will be indicated by a mean score of 20 or above.
Post-intervention (T3)
Intervention feasibility: Change from pre-intervention throughout the intervention to post-intervention and follow-up in personal recovery
Recovery will be assessed using the Brief INSPIRE-O, consisting of 5 items reflecting five dimensions of personal recovery: connectedness with others, hope and optimism for the future, positive identity, meaning in life, and empowerment, with a score range of 0-100. Feasibility will be indicated by stability or increase throughout the study period compared to pre-intervention.
Pre-intervention (T1), intervention (T2), post-intervention (T3) and follow-up (T4)
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Intervention feasibility: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events
From the beginning of the intervention (T2) to the final 3-month follow-up (T4)
Intervention feasibility: Satisfaction with the therapeutic alliance
Intervention phase (T2)
Intervention feasibility: Satisfaction with treatment (qualitative)
Post-intervention (T3)
Change from pre-intervention throughout the intervention to post-intervention and follow-up in well-being
Pre-intervention (T1), intervention (T2), post-intervention (T3) and follow-up (T4)
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention and follow-up in domain-specific recovery
Pre-intervention (T1), post-intervention (T3) and follow-up (T4)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
RETELL
EXPERIMENTALNarrative therapy to support personal recovery, delivered individually over 8-12 sessions.
Interventions
The intervention is structured around 4 central tasks focusing on different aspects of narrative repair. Task 1: Introduction to life story exploration and building alliance. Task 2: Explore and process the impact of mental illness on identity, externalizing negative narratives, and making sense of emotional responses such as guilt, grief, or shame. Task 3: Identify positive identity conclusions (e.g., strengths, values, skills) from past or current life experiences, and support their integration into the personal narrative. Task 4: Support the imagining of a realistic and hopeful future narrative, grounded in insights of previous sessions. Tasks 1-4 are addressed in a total of 8-12 sessions, depending on the specific user needs. Sessions will have an app. duration of 45-60 mins and will be delivered by the PI who is a trained therapist and psychologist (MSc. Psych.), receiving ongoing supervision. The intervention manual will be made freely available in relation to study publication.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults between the ages of 18 and 65 years
- A self-reported principal diagnosis of one or more of the following: schizophrenia (F20), bipolar disorder (F31), personality disorders (F60), obsessive-compulsive disorder (F42), anxiety disorders (F41), recurrent depressive disorder (F33), eating disorders (F50), hyperkinetic disorders (F90), post-traumatic stress disorder (F43.1), Asperger syndrome (F84.5)
- Not in full recovery (Brief INSPIRE-O \< 50)
- Danish language proficiency
- Medication stabilized (i.e., same type and dosage for a minimum of 8 weeks)
- Ability and willingness to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Self-reported diagnosis of mental retardation (F70-79) and/or organic mental disorder (F00-09)
- Psychiatric symptoms, thoughts of self-harm and/or substance abuse of self-reported severity which are likely to prevent one or all of the following: attendance at scheduled sessions, completion of questionnaires before, during and after the intervention, meaningful engagement in the therapeutic process
- Psychiatric hospitalization in the past 4 weeks
- Prior conviction of violent crime
- Currently homeless
- Currently in psychotherapy initiated within the past 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aarhus Univerity
Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Thomsen, D. K., et al. (2023). Storying Mental Illness and Personal Recovery. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Dorthe K. Thomsen, PhD
University of Aarhus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator ,Postdoc, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2025
First Posted
July 24, 2025
Study Start
July 21, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data from this study will not be shared due to their highly sensitive nature. The data include detailed narratives and information related to mental health, which pose a significant risk of re-identification-even if direct identifiers are removed. Given the ethical obligation to safeguard participants' privacy and the strict requirements of data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR), we have determined that sharing IPD would not be compatible with the informed consent provided by participants or with responsible research conduct. Therefore, only aggregate findings will be shared upon request, and only for research purposes.