Effect of Paced HR on Central BP
Implications of Paced Heart Rate on Central Blood Pressure in Sick Sinus Syndrome Patients With Hypertension: a Randomised Crossover Study
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Central (aortic) blood pressure predicts heart, brain and kidney complications more reliably than the usual peripherally measured blood pressure. Heart rate has a strong and sometimes counter-intuitive influence on central blood pressure. Pacemakers implanted due to sick sinus syndrome (SSS) are typically programmed anywhere between 55-75 beats per minute (bpm), yet it is unclear which rate gives hypertensive pacemaker recipients the most favourable central hemodynamics. This single-center, randomized, single-blind, two-period cross-over trial will enrol 20 adults (18-80 years) who already carry a dual-chamber pacemaker for SSS, are in sinus rhythm, and have medication-controlled arterial hypertension. Each participant will complete two eight-week pacing periods in random order:
- "Slow" period - pacemaker lower-rate set to 55 bpm.
- "Fast" period - pacemaker lower-rate set to 75 bpm. A two-week wash-out at the device's usual settings separates the periods. At baseline and after each intervention the team will perform non-invasive pulse-wave analysis (SphygmoCor XCEL) to obtain central systolic blood pressure (primary endpoint) and arterial stiffness indices such as augmentation index and pulse-wave velocity (secondary endpoints). Pacemaker function, symptoms and safety events are reviewed at every visit; settings can be adjusted by ±5 bpm if troublesome symptoms occur. The study will provide the first long-term evidence on how fixed pacing rates modulate central blood pressure in real-world SSS patients with hypertension, potentially guiding clinicians toward the optimal programming strategy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2025
CompletedJuly 22, 2025
July 1, 2025
4 years
July 11, 2025
July 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Central systolic blood pressure
Central (aortic) systolic blood pressure measured non-invasively using pulse wave analysis (SphygmoCor XCEL) with brachial cuff acquisition and generalized transfer function to derive central waveforms. Measurements taken in standardized seated position in clinical setting.
After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Central diastolic blood pressure
After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)
Augmentation index
After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)
Pulse wave velocity
After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)
Brachial blood pressure
After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)
Pulse pressure amplification
After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)
Study Arms (2)
"Slow" arm
EXPERIMENTALPacemaker base rate set at 55 bpm
"Fast" arm
EXPERIMENTALPacemaker base rate set at 75 bpm
Interventions
Setting the pacemaker base rate at a pre-defined base rate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-80 years.
- Dual-chamber pacemaker implanted ≥3 months for SSS.
- Sinus rhythm; atrial pacing \>80%, ventricular pacing \<3% since last device check.
- Medication-treated primary hypertension with clinic BP \< 140/90 mmHg and home BP \< 135/85 mmHg.
- Able to provide informed consent and comply with procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant AV block, paced QRS ≥ 130 ms, \>3 antihypertensives, digoxin or class Ic/III/IV antiarrhythmics, frequent atrial tachyarrhythmia (\>3% AMS episodes), coronary intervention on \>1 vessel, LVEF ≤ 40%, CRT or ICD, significant valvular disease, congenital heart disease, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m², diabetes with complications or on insulin, advanced renal, hepatic or pulmonary disease, systemic inflammatory disease, malignancy under recent active therapy, pregnancy or lactation, substance misuse, or inability to complete follow-up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
North Estonia Medical Centre
Tallinn, Harju, 13419, Estonia
Related Publications (4)
Hashimoto J. Pulse pressure amplification as a hemodynamic predictor of cardiovascular disease. Hypertens Res. 2024 Nov;47(11):3270-3272. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01880-8. Epub 2024 Sep 11. No abstract available.
PMID: 39261706BACKGROUNDFong DT, Yam KY, Chu VW, Cheung RT, Chan KM. Upper limb muscle fatigue during prolonged Boccia games with underarm throwing technique. Sports Biomech. 2012 Nov;11(4):441-51. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2012.699977.
PMID: 23259234BACKGROUNDIkeda S, Shinohara K, Enzan N, Matsushima S, Tohyama T, Funakoshi K, Kishimoto J, Itoh H, Komuro I, Tsutsui H. A higher resting heart rate is associated with cardiovascular event risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without known cardiovascular disease. Hypertens Res. 2023 May;46(5):1090-1099. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01178-1. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
PMID: 36707715BACKGROUNDFox K, Borer JS, Camm AJ, Danchin N, Ferrari R, Lopez Sendon JL, Steg PG, Tardif JC, Tavazzi L, Tendera M; Heart Rate Working Group. Resting heart rate in cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 28;50(9):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.079. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
PMID: 17719466BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor Priit Kampus
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2025
First Posted
July 22, 2025
Study Start
September 21, 2020
Primary Completion
September 10, 2024
Study Completion
September 10, 2024
Last Updated
July 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07