NCT07078487

Brief Summary

Central (aortic) blood pressure predicts heart, brain and kidney complications more reliably than the usual peripherally measured blood pressure. Heart rate has a strong and sometimes counter-intuitive influence on central blood pressure. Pacemakers implanted due to sick sinus syndrome (SSS) are typically programmed anywhere between 55-75 beats per minute (bpm), yet it is unclear which rate gives hypertensive pacemaker recipients the most favourable central hemodynamics. This single-center, randomized, single-blind, two-period cross-over trial will enrol 20 adults (18-80 years) who already carry a dual-chamber pacemaker for SSS, are in sinus rhythm, and have medication-controlled arterial hypertension. Each participant will complete two eight-week pacing periods in random order:

  • "Slow" period - pacemaker lower-rate set to 55 bpm.
  • "Fast" period - pacemaker lower-rate set to 75 bpm. A two-week wash-out at the device's usual settings separates the periods. At baseline and after each intervention the team will perform non-invasive pulse-wave analysis (SphygmoCor XCEL) to obtain central systolic blood pressure (primary endpoint) and arterial stiffness indices such as augmentation index and pulse-wave velocity (secondary endpoints). Pacemaker function, symptoms and safety events are reviewed at every visit; settings can be adjusted by ±5 bpm if troublesome symptoms occur. The study will provide the first long-term evidence on how fixed pacing rates modulate central blood pressure in real-world SSS patients with hypertension, potentially guiding clinicians toward the optimal programming strategy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2020

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 10, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 10, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 11, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 22, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

July 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

heart ratehypertensionsick sinus syndromearterial pressurepulse wave analysis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Central systolic blood pressure

    Central (aortic) systolic blood pressure measured non-invasively using pulse wave analysis (SphygmoCor XCEL) with brachial cuff acquisition and generalized transfer function to derive central waveforms. Measurements taken in standardized seated position in clinical setting.

    After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Central diastolic blood pressure

    After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)

  • Augmentation index

    After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)

  • Pulse wave velocity

    After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)

  • Brachial blood pressure

    After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)

  • Pulse pressure amplification

    After each 8-week intervention period (at week 8 and week 18 of study participation)

Study Arms (2)

"Slow" arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Pacemaker base rate set at 55 bpm

Device: Pacemaker and defibrillator

"Fast" arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Pacemaker base rate set at 75 bpm

Device: Pacemaker and defibrillator

Interventions

Setting the pacemaker base rate at a pre-defined base rate

"Fast" arm"Slow" arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-80 years.
  • Dual-chamber pacemaker implanted ≥3 months for SSS.
  • Sinus rhythm; atrial pacing \>80%, ventricular pacing \<3% since last device check.
  • Medication-treated primary hypertension with clinic BP \< 140/90 mmHg and home BP \< 135/85 mmHg.
  • Able to provide informed consent and comply with procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant AV block, paced QRS ≥ 130 ms, \>3 antihypertensives, digoxin or class Ic/III/IV antiarrhythmics, frequent atrial tachyarrhythmia (\>3% AMS episodes), coronary intervention on \>1 vessel, LVEF ≤ 40%, CRT or ICD, significant valvular disease, congenital heart disease, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m², diabetes with complications or on insulin, advanced renal, hepatic or pulmonary disease, systemic inflammatory disease, malignancy under recent active therapy, pregnancy or lactation, substance misuse, or inability to complete follow-up.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

North Estonia Medical Centre

Tallinn, Harju, 13419, Estonia

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Hashimoto J. Pulse pressure amplification as a hemodynamic predictor of cardiovascular disease. Hypertens Res. 2024 Nov;47(11):3270-3272. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01880-8. Epub 2024 Sep 11. No abstract available.

    PMID: 39261706BACKGROUND
  • Fong DT, Yam KY, Chu VW, Cheung RT, Chan KM. Upper limb muscle fatigue during prolonged Boccia games with underarm throwing technique. Sports Biomech. 2012 Nov;11(4):441-51. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2012.699977.

    PMID: 23259234BACKGROUND
  • Ikeda S, Shinohara K, Enzan N, Matsushima S, Tohyama T, Funakoshi K, Kishimoto J, Itoh H, Komuro I, Tsutsui H. A higher resting heart rate is associated with cardiovascular event risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without known cardiovascular disease. Hypertens Res. 2023 May;46(5):1090-1099. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01178-1. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

    PMID: 36707715BACKGROUND
  • Fox K, Borer JS, Camm AJ, Danchin N, Ferrari R, Lopez Sendon JL, Steg PG, Tardif JC, Tavazzi L, Tendera M; Heart Rate Working Group. Resting heart rate in cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 28;50(9):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.079. Epub 2007 Aug 13.

    PMID: 17719466BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sick Sinus SyndromeHypertension

Interventions

Defibrillators

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmia, SinusArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHeart BlockCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsVascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ElectrodesElectrical Equipment and SuppliesEquipment and Supplies

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor Priit Kampus

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2025

First Posted

July 22, 2025

Study Start

September 21, 2020

Primary Completion

September 10, 2024

Study Completion

September 10, 2024

Last Updated

July 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations