NCT07071831

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the benefit of using RetroPerc® in obtaining renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The device is already used in routine clinical practice by urologists around the country. Participants who are already scheduled to undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy as part of their regular care will be asked to participate.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
19mo left

Started Dec 2024

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress48%
Dec 2024Dec 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 6, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 17, 2025

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2027

Expected
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 4, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

July 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

kidney stones

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of successful renal access per access attempts

    The proportion of successful renal access was compared to the renal access attempts (e.g. 100 success attempts/110 attempts).

    Procedure

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Location of Renal Access

    Procedure

  • Time to gain renal access

    Procedure

  • Total Procedure Time

    Procedure

  • Length of Post-Operative Hospital Stay

    Day 0 to 3 Months Post-Operative

Study Arms (1)

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Participants with a single renal stone or total sum of 1.5 to 3 cm in maximum dimension of multiple stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy as part of their routine medical care using the RetroPerc® system to obtain renal access.

Device: RetroPerc®

Interventions

The RetroPerc® will be used to obtain renal access.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Participants undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of their renal stone (s) total linear sum of 1.5 to 3cm cm in maximum dimension.

You may qualify if:

  • Renal stone or total linear sum of 1.5-3cm cm in maximum dimension (largest diameter in axial or coronal)--- multiple stones should be summed to determine stone size.
  • Age \>=18 years of age
  • Gender: both men and women included.
  • Ethnic background: all ethnicities will be included in the study population and the specific ethnic diversity present in the study population will reflect the geographic distributions of the participating institutions.
  • Plan for PCNL in the supine position

You may not qualify if:

  • Active pregnancy
  • BMI \>45
  • Severe Hydronephrosis - renal pelvis diameter \> 20mm
  • Flank window \< 4 cm are ineligible for puncture
  • Previous ipsilateral PCNL
  • Currently with "useful" nephrostomy tube on ipsilateral side
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathies
  • Untreated urinary tract infection
  • Subjects with significant morbidities such as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 4, severe spinal cord injuries, severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, uncontrolled diabetes, neurological disorders, bedbound, anticipated life expectancy less than 5 years, or any other comorbidity, that in the opinion of the principal investigator could represent an increased peri-operative risk for the subject;
  • Ipsilateral partial nephrectomy
  • History of ipsilateral ureteral reimplantation or ureteral reconstruction;
  • History of Simple or radical prostatectomy
  • History of cystectomy
  • History of calyceal diverticula stone;
  • History of renal donation or transplant;
  • +9 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of South Florida

Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States

RECRUITING

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, 66105, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (14)

  • Lee CL, Anderson JK, Monga M. Residency training in percutaneous renal access: does it affect urological practice? J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):592-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000104849.25168.6d.

    PMID: 14713766BACKGROUND
  • Alotaibi KM. Retrograde nephrostomy access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a simple and safe technique. Urolithiasis. 2020 Apr;48(2):175-181. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01135-z. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

    PMID: 31037404BACKGROUND
  • Kaler KS, Parkhomenko E, Lin CY, Valley ZA, Kim WK, Okhunov Z, Patel RM, Landman J. A New Twist on an Old Technique: Lawson Retrograde Endoscopic-Guided Nephrostomy Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone Split-Leg Position. J Endourol Case Rep. 2018 Nov 29;4(1):190-194. doi: 10.1089/cren.2018.0073. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30515460BACKGROUND
  • Wynberg JB, Paik LJ, Odom BD, Kruger M, Atalla CS. Body mass index predicts outcome of ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1071-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0204. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

    PMID: 24779944BACKGROUND
  • Sivalingam S, Al-Essawi T, Hosking D. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with retrograde nephrostomy access: a forgotten technique revisited. J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1753-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.169. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

    PMID: 23219545BACKGROUND
  • Al-Otaibi KM. Retrograde upper-pole calyceal access for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy of stones in the lower-pole calyx. Arab J Urol. 2012 Dec;10(4):353-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 23.

    PMID: 26558049BACKGROUND
  • Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Kato Y, Uemura H, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J. Effectiveness of ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052149. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

    PMID: 23251698BACKGROUND
  • Smiths Textbook of Endourology. 2007, BC Decker Publ. Ch. 15, Dr. D. Hosking - "Retrograde Nephrostomy", Pg. 117.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mokulis JA, Peretsman SJ. Retrograde percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the Lawson technique for management of complex nephrolithiasis. J Endourol. 1997 Apr;11(2):125-30. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.125.

    PMID: 9107586BACKGROUND
  • Wong HY, Hinson JL, Griffith DP. Retrograde nephrostomy: advantages, disadvantages, and the learning curve. J Endourol. 1995 Dec;9(6):461-3. doi: 10.1089/end.1995.9.461.

    PMID: 8775075BACKGROUND
  • Morrisseau PM, Trotter SJ. Retrograde percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urological treatment of a urological problem. J Urol. 1988 Jun;139(6):1163-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42847-3.

    PMID: 3373578BACKGROUND
  • Spirnak JP, Resnick MI. Retrograde percutaneous stone removal using modified Lawson technique. Urology. 1987 Dec;30(6):551-3. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90434-1.

    PMID: 3686771BACKGROUND
  • Hunter PT, Hawkins IF, Finlayson B, Nanni G, Senior D. Hawkins-Hunter retrograde transcutaneous nephrostomy: a new technique. Urology. 1983 Dec;22(6):583-7. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(83)90300-x.

    PMID: 6649222BACKGROUND
  • Lawson RK, Murphy JB, Taylor AJ, Jacobs SC. Retrograde method for percutaneous access to kidney. Urology. 1983 Dec;22(6):580-2. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(83)90299-6.

    PMID: 6649221BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NephrolithiasisKidney Calculi

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Kidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrolithiasisMale Urogenital DiseasesUrinary CalculiCalculiPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Bristol Whiles, MD

    University of Kansas Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Research Program Manager

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2025

First Posted

July 17, 2025

Study Start

December 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified participant data collected during the study

Shared Documents
SAP, CSR
Time Frame
Following end of study
Access Criteria
Data may be requested by participating study investigators. The participating sites must have a data use agreement in place before requesting access to the data.

Locations