NCT07070063

Brief Summary

This assessor-blinded, non-randomized, parallel-group controlled study evaluated whether adding immersive virtual reality to pelvic floor muscle electrostimulation with electromyographic biofeedback improved incontinence-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with urinary incontinence. Participants received electrostimulation with EMG biofeedback alone or the same intervention preceded by a 20-minute immersive VR session.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 15, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 17, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

July 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Virtual RealityRehabilitationPelvic Floor Muscle TrainingUrinary incontinenceWomen's health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from Baseline in the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) Total Score

    The I-QOL is a 22-item instrument designed to assess the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life in women. It covers three domains: avoidance and limiting behaviors, psychosocial impacts, and social embarrassment. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = extremely to 5 = not at all). Scores are transformed into a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Baseline and immediately after the 2-week intervention

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Change from Baseline in the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) Total Score at 2-Week Post-Intervention Follow-Up

    Baseline and 2 weeks after completion of the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) Subscale Scores

    Baseline, immediately after the 2-week intervention, and 2 weeks after completion of the intervention.

  • Change from Baseline in the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (IIQ-7) Total Score

    Baseline, immediately after the 2-week intervention, and 2 weeks after completion of the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-Short Form (PISQ-12) Total Score

    Baseline, immediately after the 2-week intervention, and 2 weeks after completion of the intervention

  • Change from Baseline in the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores

    Baseline, immediately after the 2-week intervention, and 2 weeks after completion of the intervention

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

VR + ES Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received immersive virtual reality immediately before pelvic floor muscle electrostimulation and EMG biofeedback.

Device: Immersive Virtual Reality TherapyDevice: Pelvic Floor Muscle Electrostimulation with EMG Biofeedback

ES Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received pelvic floor muscle electrostimulation followed by EMG biofeedback without virtual reality.

Device: Pelvic Floor Muscle Electrostimulation with EMG Biofeedback

Interventions

Eight sessions of pelvic floor muscle electrostimulation followed by EMG biofeedback were delivered over 2 weeks (four sessions/week) using the NeuroTrac® MyoPlus 4 Pro and an individually assigned intravaginal probe. Stimulation consisted of symmetrical biphasic rectangular pulses at 50 Hz and 250 μs, with 5 seconds of stimulation, 10 seconds of rest, and 1-second ramp-up and ramp-down periods. Each electrostimulation session lasted 20 minutes. Intensity was increased to the highest comfortably tolerated level producing a visible or palpable pelvic floor muscle contraction. This was followed by approximately 5 minutes of EMG biofeedback training with real-time visualization of muscle activity.

ES GroupVR + ES Group

Eight approximately 20-minute immersive virtual reality sessions were administered over a 2-week period, with four sessions per week. The intervention was delivered using the VRTierOne system (Stolgraf®) immediately before pelvic floor muscle electrostimulation and EMG biofeedback. The virtual environment consisted of a gradually evolving therapeutic garden and included mandala-painting tasks and guided breathing exercises intended to support relaxation and engagement in the rehabilitation process. The VR system was not technically integrated with the EMG biofeedback device and did not provide real-time visualization of pelvic floor muscle activity.

VR + ES Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 80 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women aged 50-80 years, who are at least 12 months post-menopausal,
  • Diagnosed with urinary incontinence of grade I or II according to the Stamey classification,
  • No contraindications to participation (e.g., acute urinary tract infections, severe neurological disorders),
  • Provision of written informed consent to participate in the research experiment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Urinary incontinence of grade III or higher,
  • Presence of significant neurological conditions affecting bladder control,
  • Participation in other therapeutic interventions that could interfere with study outcomes,
  • Pregnancy,
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Independent Public Health Care Center of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Wrocław

Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-233, Poland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary IncontinencePelvic Floor Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPregnancy Complications

Study Officials

  • Gabriela Kołodyńska, PhD

    Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Poland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Joanna Szczepańska-Gieracha, Professor

    Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Poland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Maciej Zalewski, PhD

    Wroclaw Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Waldemar Andrzejewski, Professor

    Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Poland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were assigned to the intervention groups based on the organizational and technical availability of the virtual reality system during the recruitment period. No random sequence generation or allocation concealment was used.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2025

First Posted

July 17, 2025

Study Start

July 15, 2025

Primary Completion

November 30, 2025

Study Completion

February 28, 2026

Last Updated

July 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Locations