PURI-PRO - Symptoms Impact and eHealth Intervention for Menopausal Women With Urinary Incontinence
PURI-PRO
PURI-PRO (Portuguese URinary Incontinence PROject) - Symptoms Impact and eHealth Intervention for Menopausal Women With Urinary Incontinence
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Urinary Incontinence (UI) is a public health problem that disrupts the Quality of Life, Productivity, Social Isolation and Sexual Function; its prevalence in peri- and postmenopausal women is around 30-40%. UI remains underreported and undertreated. Previous eHealth interventions have been efficacious with women. Thus, PURI-PRO (Portuguese Urinary Incontinence Project) (FCT Grant 2020.05710.BD) entailed a low-cost 8-week eHealth cognitive-behavioural multidisciplinary intervention aimed at reducing UI symptoms' severity through Pelvic Floor Muscle Training, development of healthy bladder habits, and promotion of adherence to exercises, realistic UI-beliefs, and functional coping strategies. Urinary incontinence symptom severity, frequency and its impact on quality of life, beliefs and strategies regarding urinary incontinence, self-esteem, social isolation, and adherence to pelvic floor muscle excercises were evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedDecember 15, 2025
December 1, 2025
8 months
July 17, 2024
December 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Brief Assessment of Urinary Incontinence symptoms and impact of Quality of Life
Evaluated by "International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form" (ICIQ-UI SF)
Change from Baseline urinary incontinence symptoms and impact on quality of life adherence to mid-intervention (1 month later), post-intervention (2 months later), and at a 3 month follow-up
UI-related Coping Strategies
Evaluated by a bi-factorial instrument (hiding coping dimension and defensive coping dimension) developed by our team that entails a set of UI-related maladaptive coping strategies to manage immediate effects of UI. This instrument is based on the work of Diokno and collaborators.
Change from Baseline UI-related coping strategies to mid-intervention (1 month later), post-intervention (2 months later), and at a 3 month follow-up
UI-related Beliefs
Evaluated by the Portuguese version of the "Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire" (IPQ-Brief). This instrument is based on the work of Figueiras and collaborators.
Change from Baseline UI-related beliefs to mid-intervention (1 month later), post-intervention (2 months later), and at a 3 month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Urinary Incontinence symptom severity and impact
Change from Baseline Urinary Incontinence symptom severity and impact to mid-intervention (1 month later), post-intervention (2 months later), and at a 3 month follow-up
Self-reported Quality of Life
Change from Baseline quality of life to mid-intervention (1 month later), post-intervention (2 months later), and at a 3 month follow-up
Behavior Change (HAPA)
Change from Baseline behavior to mid-intervention (1 month later), post-intervention (2 months later), and at a 3 month follow-up
Self-esteem
Change from Baseline self-esteem to mid-intervention (1 month later), post-intervention (2 months later), and at a 3 month follow-up
Social Isolation
Change from Baseline social isolation to mid-intervention (1 month later), post-intervention (2 months later), and at a 3 month follow-up
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
eHealth intervention for UI symptoms improvement
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the Experimental Group were integrated into an eHealth 8-week group intervention, based on the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). The eHealth (internet-based) cognitive-behavioural intervention developed to promote UI symptoms improvement consisted of: i) weekly group sessions (by Zoom platform), with a specific theme in each session, ii) weekly challenges, and iii) WhatsApp group interaction.
Control Group: Delivery of a Health Literacy single-leaflet
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group received a health literacy single-leaflet, delivered through email.
Interventions
A health literacy single-leaflet was delivered, by e-mail in the first week of the intervention. Beyond this, there was no further interaction with the group. All primary and secondary outcome measures were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (one month later), post-intervention, and in a 3 month follow-up after the intervention.
The intervention was theoretically based on the HAPA model (including effective strategies in behaviour change, for example, action planning and coping with obstacles) and Common Sense Model of Self Regulation (beliefs, coping and appraisal), focusing on risk perception, planning, and self-efficacy. The intervention consisted of 8 sessions (90 minutes, once a week). All group intervention sessions, through the Zoom platform, were led by the psychologist responsible for the study, except the second session that was led by a physiotherapist. WhatsApp groups were created, to share experiences, knowledge, doubts and fears, and to create a sense of belonging, understanding and cohesion. All primary and secondary outcome measures were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (one month later), post-intervention, and in a 3 month follow-up after the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age (40-65 years);
- Sex (women);
- The presence of UI (positive response to a question about experiencing involuntary urine loss during intra-abdominal pressure increment and/or when feeling an incontrollable urge to urinate, occasionally or frequently);
- Internet access.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or delivery in the past 6 months;
- Previous UI-related surgery;
- History of pelvic prolapse:
- Known malignancy in the lower abdomen;
- Neurological disease that could affect bladder control;
- Substance use disorder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ISPA-IU
Lisbon, Portugal
Related Publications (24)
Schroe H, Van Dyck D, De Paepe A, Poppe L, Loh WW, Verloigne M, Loeys T, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Crombez G. Which behaviour change techniques are effective to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in adults: a factorial randomized trial of an e- and m-health intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Oct 7;17(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01001-x.
PMID: 33028335BACKGROUNDSchwarzer R, Renner B. Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy. Health Psychol. 2000 Sep;19(5):487-95.
PMID: 11007157BACKGROUNDLeventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E. The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):935-946. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
PMID: 27515801BACKGROUNDImamura M, Abrams P, Bain C, Buckley B, Cardozo L, Cody J, Cook J, Eustice S, Glazener C, Grant A, Hay-Smith J, Hislop J, Jenkinson D, Kilonzo M, Nabi G, N'Dow J, Pickard R, Ternent L, Wallace S, Wardle J, Zhu S, Vale L. Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(40):1-188, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14400.
PMID: 20738930BACKGROUNDHarper RC, Sheppard S, Stewart C, Clark CJ. Exploring Adherence to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Women Using Mobile Apps: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Nov 30;11:e45947. doi: 10.2196/45947.
PMID: 38032694BACKGROUNDDumoulin C, Hay-Smith J, Frawley H, McClurg D, Alewijnse D, Bo K, Burgio K, Chen SY, Chiarelli P, Dean S, Hagen S, Herbert J, Mahfooza A, Mair F, Stark D, Van Kampen M; International Continence Society. 2014 consensus statement on improving pelvic floor muscle training adherence: International Continence Society 2011 State-of-the-Science Seminar. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Sep;34(7):600-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.22796. Epub 2015 May 21.
PMID: 25998603BACKGROUNDGarley A, Unwin J. A case series to pilot cognitive behaviour therapy for women with urinary incontinence. Br J Health Psychol. 2006 Sep;11(Pt 3):373-86. doi: 10.1348/135910705X53876.
PMID: 16870050BACKGROUNDFunada S, Watanabe N, Goto T, Negoro H, Akamatsu S, Ueno K, Uozumi R, Ichioka K, Segawa T, Akechi T, Furukawa TA, Ogawa O. Cognitive behavioral therapy for overactive bladder in women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00697-0.
PMID: 32819331BACKGROUNDSteenstrup B, Lopes F, Cornu JN, Gilliaux M. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and urge urinary incontinence in women. A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 May;33(5):1091-1101. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04989-3. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
PMID: 34716765BACKGROUNDDowd T, Kolcaba K, Steiner R. Using cognitive strategies to enhance bladder control and comfort. Holist Nurs Pract. 2000 Jan;14(2):91-103. doi: 10.1097/00004650-200001000-00013.
PMID: 12119974BACKGROUNDDumoulin C, Alewijnse D, Bo K, Hagen S, Stark D, Van Kampen M, Herbert J, Hay-Smith J, Frawley H, McClurg D, Dean S. Pelvic-Floor-Muscle Training Adherence: Tools, Measurements and Strategies-2011 ICS State-of-the-Science Seminar Research Paper II of IV. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Sep;34(7):615-21. doi: 10.1002/nau.22794. Epub 2015 May 21.
PMID: 25998493BACKGROUNDDumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;10(10):CD005654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4.
PMID: 30288727BACKGROUNDBo K, Fernandes ACNL, Duarte TB, Brito LGO, Ferreira CHJ. Is pelvic floor muscle training effective for symptoms of overactive bladder in women? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2020 Mar;106:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
PMID: 32026847BACKGROUNDDowd T, Dowd ET. A cognitive therapy approach to promote continence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;33(1):63-8. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200601000-00010.
PMID: 16444107BACKGROUNDKelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Dec;104(12):1374-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11006.x.
PMID: 9422015BACKGROUNDAlewijnse D, Metsemakers JF, Mesters IE, van den Borne B. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle exercise therapy supplemented with a health education program to promote long-term adherence among women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(4):284-95. doi: 10.1002/nau.10122.
PMID: 12808702BACKGROUNDAvery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041.
PMID: 15227649BACKGROUNDSkevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
PMID: 15085902BACKGROUNDCanavarro MC, Serra AV, Simoes MR, Rijo D, Pereira M, Gameiro S, Quartilho MJ, Quintais L, Carona C, Paredes T. Development and psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100) in Portugal. Int J Behav Med. 2009;16(2):116-24. doi: 10.1007/s12529-008-9024-2. Epub 2009 May 8.
PMID: 19424810BACKGROUNDBroadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.
PMID: 16731240BACKGROUNDDiokno AC, Burgio K, Fultz NH, Kinchen KS, Obenchain R, Bump RC. Medical and self-care practices reported by women with urinary incontinence. Am J Manag Care. 2004 Feb;10(2 Pt 1):69-78.
PMID: 15011807BACKGROUNDShah AD, Massagli MP, Kohli N, Rajan SS, Braaten KP, Hoyte L. A reliable, valid instrument to assess patient knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0631-x. Epub 2008 May 15.
PMID: 18480958BACKGROUNDFigueiras, M. J., Monteiro, R., and Caeiro, R. (2012). Crenças erróneas e perceção da doença em pacientes cardíacos e seus cônjuges: Um estudo piloto. Psychol. Commun. Health 1, 232-245. https://doi.org/10.5964/pch.v1i3.24
BACKGROUNDRenner B, Schwarzer R. Risk and health behaviors. Documentation of the scales of the research project: Risk appraisal consequences in Korea (RACK) 2nd ed. Bremen: International University Bremen & Freie Universität Berlin; 2005.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marta G Porto, Master's
ISPA-IU
- STUDY CHAIR
Filipa F Pimenta, PhD
ISPA-IU
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2024
First Posted
July 30, 2024
Study Start
April 22, 2025
Primary Completion
December 18, 2025
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12