The Improvement of Indoor Air and Health Effects After Air Purifier Intervention Among Susceptible Population in Industrial Area
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Invesitigators conducted a double-blind, randomized, and crossover study to investigate the effects of PCO and PCO + filters interventions on indoor air pollutants in households and health outcomes in susceptible group, such as asthma and COPD patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2025
CompletedJuly 17, 2025
June 1, 2025
2.9 years
June 22, 2025
July 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (22)
Indoor air pollutants
The DustTrak DRX mass monitor (Model 8533, TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA) was used to measure PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM10, and TSP continuously for 24 h, and UFPs were measured for 15 min at a time by using the P-Trak Ultrafine Particle Counter (Model 8525, TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA). The YesAir 15-channel indoor air quality monitor (Critical Environment Technologies Canada, Delta, British Columbia, Canada) was used to measure TVOC, NO2, SO2, CO, and CO2 continuously for 24 h. Airborne bacteria and fungi were collected using MAS-100 air sampler, which is a single-stage microbiological sampler with tryptic soy agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) and malt extract agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA). Airborne endotoxin and mite samples were collected using 1-µm pore polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) membrane filters (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY, USA) placed in disposable plastic cassettes (37 mm; HIBLOW SPP-25 GA, Techno Takatsuki, Japan).
One day 0 (before intervention) and day 1 (after intervention)
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)
FeNO, considered an indicator of airway inflammation, was measured using the NIOX VERO device (Aerocrine AB, Solna, Sweden).
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
Blood pressure
We employed the HEM-8712 device (Omron Healthcare Co. Ltd., Japan) to measure blood pressure.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
Heavy metals
We assessed 15 heavy metals in urine samples, including Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, As, Se, Rb, Sr, Cd, Cs, V, Cu, Zn, Mo, using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, X-series II, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany).
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
We used SCIEX 4000QTRAP Triple Quadrupole Hybrid Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer to assess urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, including 1-hydroxypyrene, 2-Hydroxyfluorene, 1-Hydroxyphenanthrene, 4-Hydroxyphenanthrene.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
microRNA
We evaluated miRNA, such as miR-146a-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-222-3p, miR-155-5p, miR-29b-3p, miR-194-3p, using real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System).
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
cell-free DNA
We evaluated cell-free DNA, using real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System).
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
Cytokines
We evaluated cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, IL-25, IL-28A, IL-29, IL-31, IL-33, IL-34, and TGF-β1, using (Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA) assay (R \& D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
slow vital capacity (SVC)
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to assess the lung function.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
forced vital capacity (FVC)
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
FEV1/FVC
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to assess the lung function.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
peak expiratory flow (PEF)
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to assess the lung function.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF)
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to assess the lung function.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
forced expiratory flow (FEF) at 25% (FEF25)
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to assess the lung function.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
FEF50
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to assess the lung function.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
FEF75
A multifunction spirometer (HI-801, Chest MI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to assess the lung function.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
asthma control test (ACT)
The asthma control test (ACT) served as a measure of asthma control, with high scores indicating better control of the condition.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
Respiratory symptoms score
The respiratory symptoms score evaluated in the questionnaire were stuffy nose, sneezing, runny nose, cough, shortness of breath, and chest tightness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each respiratory symptom by using a 4-point scale, where 0, 1, 2, and 3 denoted no, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms, respectively.
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) includes eight items (cough, sputum, breathlessness, chest tightness, confidence, activity, sleep and energy levels), rated on a 5-point scale (1 to 5).
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC)
The modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) assessed dyspnea using a 5-grade scale (Grade 0 to Grade 4).
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS)
The Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS) evaluated cough, sputum, and breathlessness using a 5-point scale (0 to 4).
On day 0 ( before intervention), day 7 and day 13 ( after intervention)
Study Arms (2)
photocatalytic oxidation intervention
SHAM COMPARATORphotocatalytic oxidation and filters intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
PCO was proved to decompose gaseous pollutants in chamber studies, while there is no study investigate the effects in real-world. We used PCO air purifiers in households for two weeks.
PCO was proved to decompose gaseous pollutants in chamber studies, while there is no study investigate the effects in real-world. We used PCO and filters air purifiers in households for two weeks, to understand the effects comparing with PCO.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- dianosed with asthma/COPD
You may not qualify if:
- did not diagonse with asthma /COPD
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kaohsiung Medical University
Kaohsiung City, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2025
First Posted
July 17, 2025
Study Start
June 29, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions.