A Comparative Study Between TAPP and Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is comperative study between TAPP And Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery.The Lichtenstein tension-free open hernioplasty involves placing a tailored polypropylene mesh over the inguinal canal defect, secured to ligament and oblique fascia under local/regional anesthesia.Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair uses laparoscopic access via three ports (umbilicus and bilateral midclavicular lines), incises and closes a peritoneal flap, and places a large mesh in the preperitoneal space. Compression between these two procedure in terms of intraoperative ,postoperative complications and Long term follow up for recurrence of Hernia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2025
CompletedJuly 16, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.3 years
July 5, 2025
July 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Operative time
Total duration of surgery in minutes, measure skin incision to reversal of pneumoperitoneum
Intraoperative (measure during surgical procedure on day1)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative ileus
Up to 5 days
Surgical site infection
Up to 30 days post operation
Hospital stay
From date of surgery untill discharge , assessed upto 14days
Study Arms (2)
Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery using as conventional method
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to this arm will undergo open Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair for inguinal hernia under regional (spinal) or local anesthesia. A standard polypropylene mesh will be placed over the inguinal canal posterior wall and fixed to the inguinal ligament and conjoint tendon using non-absorbable sutures. The procedure is performed through a single inguinal incision. Patients will receive perioperative analgesia and standard postoperative care. This technique serves as the control group, reflecting conventional open hernia repair.
TAPP Repair
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undergo laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia under general anesthesia. A standard 3-port laparoscopic technique will be used. After accessing the preperitoneal space, a large polypropylene mesh will be placed to cover the myopectineal orifice and fixed using tacks or glue. The peritoneal flap will be closed using absorbable sutures or staplers. Patients will receive standard laparoscopic postoperative care. This arm represents the minimally invasive surgical option.
Interventions
Open surgical repair of inguinal hernia using a tension-free mesh technique. A standard polypropylene mesh is placed over the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and fixed with non-absorbable sutures under spinal or local anesthesia. This is a conventional method widely used in open hernia surgery.
Laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair performed under general anesthesia. Three ports are used to access the abdominal cavity, and a peritoneal flap is created to place a large polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space. The mesh is fixed with tacks or glue, and the peritoneal flap is closed. This minimally invasive method is designed to reduce postoperative pain and enhance recovery.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ganesh Shankar vidhyapthi Memorial Medical college kanpur
Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shubham Chaubey, Principle investigator, MBBS
GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE KANPUR
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2025
First Posted
July 16, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 15, 2025
Study Completion
August 15, 2025
Last Updated
July 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- CSR
- Time Frame
- 6 months after publication of results for 2 years
- Access Criteria
- Qualifed researchers upon reasonable request
De-identified individual participants( IPD ) related to operative time, hospital stay and post operative complications