Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality Counseling on Improving Shared Decision-Making in Thoracic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) counseling compared to traditional verbal counseling for patients undergoing thoracic surgery. MAR counseling integrates patient-specific 3D anatomical models to enhance understanding of surgical procedures and risks. The study assesses patient and caregiver satisfaction, decision-making confidence, and communication quality. Health care providers' perspectives on the counseling methods are also examined. Participants will be assigned to one of the two counseling groups and asked to complete a questionnaire immediately after the counseling session.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2025
CompletedJuly 17, 2025
July 1, 2025
11 months
July 2, 2025
July 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Shared decision-making score
Shared decision-making was evaluated using a validated questionnaire assessing patient perceptions of decision support, preparedness, and engagement. The total score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating better shared decision-making.
Immediately after counseling session (single timepoint)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient counseling preference
Immediately after both counseling sessions
Study Arms (2)
Traditional First, Then MAR Counseling (T-M group)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive traditional counseling first, followed by MAR counseling using a 3D mobile application.
MAR First, Then Traditional Counseling (M-T group)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive MAR counseling first using a mobile 3D model app, followed by traditional counseling with CT images and verbal explanations.
Interventions
A single session begins with mobile augmented-reality counseling using interactive 3D models, followed by a standard verbal counseling with printed diagrams and CT images.
A single session begins with mobile augmented-reality counseling using interactive 3D models, followed by a standard verbal counseling with printed diagrams and CT images.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 20 years and older
- Scheduled for elective thoracic surgery
- Able to understand written and spoken Mandarin
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Capable of completing questionnaires independently or with minimal assistance
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery cases
- Severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric illness interfering with participation
- Visual or hearing impairments that prevent interaction with mobile devices
- Previous participation in a similar counseling trial
- Inability to complete follow-up procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tri-Service General Hospital
Taipei, 114202, Taiwan
Related Publications (8)
McDonald M, Shirk JD. The Effect of Digital Three-Dimensional Reality Models on Patient Counseling for Renal Masses. JSLS. 2023 Jan-Mar;27(1):e2022.00084. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00084.
PMID: 36818764BACKGROUNDArjomandi Rad A, Vardanyan R, Thavarajasingam SG, Zubarevich A, Van den Eynde J, Sa MPBO, Zhigalov K, Sardiari Nia P, Ruhparwar A, Weymann A. Extended, virtual and augmented reality in thoracic surgery: a systematic review. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jan 18;34(2):201-211. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab241.
PMID: 34542639BACKGROUNDDeber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1414-20.
PMID: 8678709BACKGROUNDBraddock CH 3rd, Fihn SD, Levinson W, Jonsen AR, Pearlman RA. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions. Informed decision making in the outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jun;12(6):339-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00057.x.
PMID: 9192250BACKGROUNDKessels RP. Patients' memory for medical information. J R Soc Med. 2003 May;96(5):219-22. doi: 10.1177/014107680309600504. No abstract available.
PMID: 12724430BACKGROUNDLackey A, Donington JS. Surgical management of lung cancer. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013 Jun;30(2):133-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1342954.
PMID: 24436529BACKGROUNDSiegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
PMID: 31912902BACKGROUNDChen YS, Hsu YC, Romalee W, Wang DH, Lai J, Huang TW, Lin KH. Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality Counseling on Improving Shared Decision-Making in Thoracic Surgery: Randomized Clinical Crossover Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Nov 13;13:e79632. doi: 10.2196/79632.
PMID: 41069141DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kuan-Hsun Lin, MD
Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2025
First Posted
July 14, 2025
Study Start
July 15, 2022
Primary Completion
June 19, 2023
Study Completion
June 19, 2023
Last Updated
July 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to ethical considerations and institutional policy. The informed consent obtained from participants does not include provisions for public data sharing.