NCT06725225

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to explore whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be used as a predictive indicator for lung cancer patients and to implement clinical interventions. The study addresses two main objectives: Analyzing HRQoL data of lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy using machine learning clustering methods to explore data patterns and build an HRQoL early warning model (already developed). Validating this HRQoL early warning model in real-world settings by classifying patients with different HRQoL characteristics and assessing the clinical value of the model

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2024

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

December 13, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

December 1, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

HRQOLlung cancerimmunotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • EORTC QLQ C30

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30) is a tool used to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 30 items covering functioning, symptoms, and overall health status. Scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 7 (depending on the item type), with overall scores typically ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life with fewer symptoms and better functioning, while lower scores reflect worse quality of life with more severe symptoms and poorer functioning.

    Two weeks after the intervention

  • EORTC QLQ LC-13

    The EORTC QLQ LC-13 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Lung Cancer Module 13) is a questionnaire used to assess the quality of life of lung cancer patients. It includes 13 items, with scores ranging from 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms and poorer quality of life, while a lower score indicates better quality of life. The EORTC QLQ LC-13 is often used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, as they complement each other and provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of life in lung cancer patients.

    Two weeks after the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • ORR (Objective Response Rate)

    Two weeks after the intervention

  • PFS (Progression-Free Survival)

    Two weeks after the intervention

Study Arms (2)

The group with milder symptoms and better quality of life

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

the group uses unsupervised machine learning to identify patients with severe symptoms and poor functionality who are receiving immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, and implements a symptom cluster care intervention.

Behavioral: Conventional care intervention

The group with more severe symptoms and poorer quality of life

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Symptom cluster-based care intervention

Interventions

The patient symptoms were surveyed to develop a symptom cluster care intervention plan. The specific steps were as follows: a research team was established, relevant literature was reviewed, and qualitative interviews were conducted. Guided by symptom management theory and the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) behavior model, a draft of the care intervention was created. This draft was then refined through expert consultation to finalize the intervention plan.

The group with more severe symptoms and poorer quality of life

Standard nursing intervention. This refers to routine clinical care without a specific care plan tailored to the patient's symptoms. For example, if a patient has symptoms, the nurse assists the patient in notifying the doctor but does not provide any special treatment themselves

The group with milder symptoms and better quality of life

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Histologically diagnosed with lung cancer
  • Age over 18 years
  • Currently receiving immunotherapy for lung cancer
  • Good verbal communication ability
  • Informed consent signed by the patient or family member

You may not qualify if:

  • Cognitive impairment or mental illness
  • Other severe diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A symptom cluster care intervention plan is being developed, and a research team is formed. Based on relevant literature and qualitative interviews, and guided by symptom management theory and the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) behavior model, an initial draft of the care intervention plan is created and refined through expert consultation to finalize the plan.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
associate professor and associate chief physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2024

First Posted

December 10, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

April 1, 2026

Last Updated

December 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No IPD will be shared.

Available IPD Datasets

Individual Participant Data Set Access