NCT07061002

Brief Summary

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome are at higher risk for respiratory complications after surgery. Oxygen depletion and respiratory distress are common in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. In this study, the effectiveness of the recruitment maneuver applied in the postoperative period will be investigated via lung ultrasound. Recruitment is a technique performed to improve the oxygen levels of patients. Patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome between the ages of 18-65 will be included in the study and anesthesia and surgical procedures will be followed. The aim of the study is to compare the pulmonary complication rates between patients who underwent recruitment and those who did not, and to examine the effects of factors such as age and gender on these complications via lung ultrasound.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Jul 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Jul 2025Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 25, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 20, 2026

Expected
11 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 11, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

July 2, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Postoperative Pulmonary Atelectaseslung ultrasound scorerecruitment maneuver

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • pulmonary complications underwent recruitment maneuver

    The primary outcome of the study was to compare the pulmonary complication rates between patients who underwent the recruitment maneuver and those who did not by lung ultrasound. Pulmonary complications were assessed by using the modified lung ultrasound score (LUSS). Higher scores on the LUSS indicated more severe ventilation loss. The degree of deaeration was assessed from 0 to 3. , Less than 3 B lines; ≥3 B lines were rated as 1, greater than 5 and confluent B lines were rated as 2, and multiple confluent B lines separated by a thickened or irregular pleural line or multiple subpleural consolidations were rated as 3.

    10 minutes before the start of surgery until 10 minutes after the end of surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pulmonary Complications with Different Recruitment Maneuver Techniques

    10 minutes before the start of surgery until 10 minutes after the end of surgery

Study Arms (3)

Group 1- control

NO INTERVENTION

The patient will be ventilated throughout the surgery by applying 5 cmH2O post expiratory positive end-expiratory pressure. Lung ultrasound will be performed on the patients before surgery, 5 minutes after mechanical ventilation after orotracheal intubation, at the end of surgery and 5 minutes after extubation. The lung will be evaluated in 8 regions. These will be evaluated as upper and lower in the mid-clavicular line, upper and lower in the anterior axillary line, upper and lower in the posterior axillary line and Plaps point. It will be evaluated by calculating the modified Lung Ultrasound Score (LUSS) to detect ventilation loss. Higher scores in LUSS indicate more severe ventilation loss. The degree of deaeration will be evaluated between 0 and 3. , 0 less than 3 B line; ≥3 B lines indicate 1, greater than 5 and confluent B lines indicate 2, and multiple confluent B lines or multiple subpleural consolidations separated by a thickened or irregular pleural line indicate 3.

Group 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The ventilation strategy of the patients in this group will be the same as in group 1. In contrast, just before extubation, the patients in this group will be given 6 breaths with a tidal volume of 2 times the vital capacity, an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1/1 and a lung plateau pressure of \< 35 cmH2O, and a recruitment maneuver will be performed at the end of the surgery. All patients will undergo lung ultrasound in the defined lung zones and at the specified times, as described in group 1, and a modified Lung Ultrasound score will be evaluated.

Other: Lung Recruitment Maneuver

Group 3

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The ventilation strategy of the patients in this group will be the same as in group 1. In addition to positive end-expiratory pressure, the patient will be placed in the right and then left lateral decubitus position before extubation at the end of the surgery and a recruitment maneuver will be performed by giving 6 breaths in each position with a tidal volume twice the vital capacity, a 1/1 inspiratory/expiratory ratio and a lung plateau pressure \< 35 cmH2O. All patients will undergo lung ultrasound in defined lung regions and at specified times, as defined in group 1, and a modified Lung Ultrasound score will be evaluated.

Other: Positional Lung Recruitment Maneuver

Interventions

Lung Recruitment Maneuver (LRM) is a method that allows the alveoli to reopen by applying high positive pressure in order to prevent or treat alveolar collapse (atelectasis) that develops during or after anesthesia. LRM improves oxygenation by increasing functional residual capacity. Clinical studies have shown that LRM increases oxygenation levels, reduces areas of atelectasis, and shortens hospital stay. In this study, the effects of different recruitment maneuvers on postoperative atelectasis will be evaluated. In this group, just before extubation, the patients in this group will be given 6 breaths with a tidal volume of 2 times the vital capacity, an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1/1 and a lung plateau pressure of \< 35 cmH2O, and a recruitment maneuver will be performed at the end of the surgery.

Group 2

Lung Recruitment Maneuver (LRM) is a method that allows the alveoli to reopen by applying high positive pressure in order to prevent or treat alveolar collapse (atelectasis) that develops during or after anesthesia. LRM improves oxygenation by increasing functional residual capacity. Clinical studies have shown that LRM increases oxygenation levels, reduces areas of atelectasis, and shortens the length of hospital stay. In this study, the effects of different recruitment maneuvers on postoperative atelectasis will be evaluated. Patients in this group will be placed in the right and then left lateral decubitus position before extubation at the end of surgery and a recruitment maneuver will be performed by giving 6 breaths in each position, with a tidal volume twice the vital capacity, a 1/1 inspiratory/expiratory ratio, and a lung plateau pressure \< 35 cmH2O.

Group 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18-65
  • American Society of Anesthesia I-III
  • Patients with consent to participate
  • Patients with preoperative OSA diagnosis (polysomnography or STOP-BANG≥3)

You may not qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesia \>IV
  • Patients planned for postoperative intensive care follow-up 3. Cardiac surgery
  • Anesthesia outside the operating room
  • History of neuromuscular disease
  • Emergency surgical application
  • Invasive airway surgeries (pharynx, larynx)
  • Lung surgeries (pneumonectomy, lobectomy, etc.) 9. Presence of pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty

Istanbul, 34153, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Touw HR, Schuitemaker AE, Daams F, van der Peet DL, Bronkhorst EM, Schober P, Boer C, Tuinman PR. Routine lung ultrasound to detect postoperative pulmonary complications following major abdominal surgery: a prospective observational feasibility study. Ultrasound J. 2019 Sep 16;11(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13089-019-0135-6.

  • Canet J, Hardman J, Sabate S, Langeron O, Abreu MG, Gallart L, Belda J, Markstaller K, Pelosi P, Mazo V. PERISCOPE study: predicting post-operative pulmonary complications in Europe. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;28(6):459-61. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328344be2d. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Atelectasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ayse Cigdem Tutuncu, Professor

    Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Munevver Kayhan, Lecturer Doctor

    Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Pinar Kendigelen, Professor Doctor

    Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Munevver Kayhan, Lecturer Doctor

CONTACT

Ayse Cigdem Tutuncu, Professor Doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
After participants are enrolled and informed consent is obtained, they will be randomly assigned to one of three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomization list prepared by an independent anesthesiologist who is not involved in the intervention. Allocation concealment will be ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes for each patient. To maintain double blinding, both the patients and the researchers responsible for postoperative evaluations (including those performing lung ultrasound and clinical follow-ups) will remain unaware of group assignments. The intraoperative team responsible for performing the intervention will only carry out the assigned procedure and will not be involved in data collection, evaluation, or analysis. Group assignments will be documented separately and kept confidential until the study is completed and data analysis is finalized.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2025

First Posted

July 11, 2025

Study Start

July 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations