NCT07057908

Brief Summary

This study compares two airway devices that are commonly used during elective surgery: the video laryngeal mask airway (VLM) and the video laryngoscope (VLS). Both are part of routine anesthesia practice. Our main focus is to measure how long intubation takes with each device and to see how successful the intubation is. The study does not involve any extra procedures or risks; everything will be carried out as part of normal patient care.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
176

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 30, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 2, 2026

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 2, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

June 30, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 28, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Video LaryngoscopeVideo Laryngeal Mask AirwaySaCoVLMIntubation Success RateObservational StudyElective Surgical Patients

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Successful Intubation

    The time from when the endotracheal tube passes the upper incisors to the appearance of three consecutive end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂) waveforms on the capnograph. This will be used as the objective marker of successful tracheal intubation. Timing will be recorded in seconds by an independent observer using a stopwatch.

    Intraoperative (from tube passing the upper incisors to the third ETCO₂ waveform)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • First-Attempt Intubation Success Rate

    Immediately after intubation

  • Insertion-Related Complications

    Intraoperative and early postoperative period (0-30 minutes)

Study Arms (2)

Video Laryngoscope

Tracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope assisted with a bougie in adult patients undergoing elective surgery.

Procedure: Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM) Intubation with Bougie

Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM)

Tracheal intubation performed through a video laryngeal mask airway (SaCoVLM) with bougie assistance in adult patients undergoing elective surgery.

Procedure: Video Laryngoscope Intubation with Bougie

Interventions

Participants in this group will undergo tracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope under general anesthesia. After induction, a standard bougie will be advanced through the vocal cords under video guidance, and the endotracheal tube will be railroaded over the bougie into the trachea. The primary outcome will be intubation time, measured from insertion of the device until confirmation of successful tracheal intubation. Additional parameters such as intubation success rate, ease of insertion, and complications (e.g., desaturation, airway trauma, failed attempts) will also be recorded. No extra procedures will be performed beyond routine airway management.

Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM)

Participants in this group will undergo tracheal intubation using a video laryngeal mask airway (SaCoVLM) under general anesthesia. After successful placement of the device, a standard bougie will be inserted through the SaCoVLM's dedicated lumen, and an endotracheal tube will be advanced over the bougie into the trachea under video guidance. The primary outcome will be intubation time, defined as the duration from device insertion to confirmation of successful intubation. Secondary outcomes include intubation success rate, ease of insertion, and complications such as desaturation, trauma, or failed attempts. As both techniques are part of routine practice, no additional risks will be introduced.

Video Laryngoscope

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients aged 18 years and older, classified as ASA I to III, who are scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia. All participants will require tracheal intubation using either a video laryngoscope or a video laryngeal mask airway (SaCoVLM), both with bougie assistance.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged 18 years and older
  • Patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures
  • Patients classified as ASA Physical Status I-III
  • Patients undergoing general anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18 years
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery
  • Patients with difficult airway predictors, such as:
  • Mallampati score ≥ 3
  • Thyromental distance \< 6 cm
  • Mouth opening \< 3 cm
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities or surgical history involving the oropharynx, larynx, or airway
  • Patients with conditions contraindicating head or neck manipulation (e.g., cervical instability, upper airway tumors)
  • Pregnant patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Samsun University, Samsun Training and Research Hospital

Samsun, Ilkadim, 55000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Sargin M, Uluer MS. Comparison of McGrath((R)) Series 5 video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective, randomised trial in patients with normal airways. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):869-74. doi: 10.12669/pjms.324.10037.

    PMID: 27648030BACKGROUND
  • Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Sep;5(9):919-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x.

    PMID: 9754506BACKGROUND
  • Sun Y, Huang L, Xu L, Zhang M, Guo Y, Wang Y. The Application of a SaCoVLMTM Visual Intubation Laryngeal Mask for the Management of Difficult Airways in Morbidly Obese Patients: Case Report. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 18;8:763103. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.763103. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34869469BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Intubation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TherapeuticsInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Hatice S Kuşderci

    Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2025

First Posted

July 10, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion

February 2, 2026

Study Completion

March 2, 2026

Last Updated

September 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Locations