Videolaryngoscopic Difficult ıntubation and Glottic View Score: A Multicentre Prospective Study
VIDIGLOV
Prediction of Difficult Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Development of a Dedicated Glottic View Score: A Multicentre Prospective Study
1 other identifier
observational
4,977
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: Videolaryngoscopy has improved glottic visualization and facilitated tracheal intubation. However, difficulties-including failed intubation-still occur. At present, no prospectively derived classification system exists to assess the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic (VL) intubation across both normal and anticipated difficult airways. Additionally, current glottic view grading systems, designed for direct laryngoscopy, may not adequately capture the specific challenges of VL intubation. Objectives: This study aims to:
- 1.Develop a predictive model for difficult VL intubation in surgical patients with both normal and anticipated difficult airways.
- 2.Create a glottic view scoring system specifically tailored to videolaryngoscopy.
- 3.Compare the predictive accuracy of the new scoring system with existing laryngeal view grades in forecasting difficult VL intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2027
February 5, 2026
January 1, 2026
1 year
December 2, 2025
February 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Failed first intubation attempt
Failed to intubate at firtst attempt
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Difficult intubation
Failed to intubate at 1-2 attempts and/or intubation duration longer than 120 second
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Failed intubation
Not able to intubate the patient
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Intubation duration
Time elapsed from entring the blade between the teeth to detecting an entidal carbondioxide trace
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Glottic view description
Vocal cords are fully visible Vocal cords are partially separately Vocal cords are not visible Cords are adducted Epiglottis is visible Epiglottis is large Epiglottis is small Epiglottis is edematous Epiglottis mass is present Arytenoids are visible Arytenoid luxation or subluxation Arytenoid edema Valecula problem (edema, Coffee grounds, etc., unable to insert a blade) Aryepiglottic plica pathology (edema, Coffee grounds scar) Laryngeal structures should be formed Glottic stenosis Laryngospasm
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Percentil of glottic opening score
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Cormack lehanne score
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Eligibility Criteria
Adults, both with normal or predicted difficult airways, undergoing orotracheal intubation with a videolarygoscope, for a case mix of surgeries
You may qualify if:
- Adults
- Both with normal or predicted difficult airways
- Undergoing orotracheal intubation with a videolarygoscope
You may not qualify if:
- Rapid sequence intubation
- Double lumen tube intubation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Etlik City Hospital
Ankara, 06170, Turkey (Türkiye)
Akdeniz University Medical Faculty
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Xia M, Jin C, Zheng Y, Wang J, Zhao M, Cao S, Xu T, Pei B, Irwin MG, Lin Z, Jiang H. Deep learning-based facial analysis for predicting difficult videolaryngoscopy: a feasibility study. Anaesthesia. 2024 Apr;79(4):399-409. doi: 10.1111/anae.16194. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
PMID: 38093485BACKGROUNDO'Loughlin EJ, Swann AD, English JD, Ramadas R. Accuracy, intra- and inter-rater reliability of three scoring systems for the glottic view at videolaryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jul;72(7):835-839. doi: 10.1111/anae.13837. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
PMID: 28337769BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dilek Yazıcıoğlu Ünal, professor
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2025
First Posted
January 21, 2026
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share