Impact of Verbal Compared to Structured Information on Patient's Anxiety and Satisfaction Undergoing Uroflowmetry
1 other identifier
interventional
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Uroflowmetry (UFM) is a non-invasive initial, simple, and widely performed first-line investigation for the evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms. Despite its non-invasive nature, uroflowmetry can provoke anxiety and affect satisfaction, often due to misunderstandings about the procedure. Objective: This randomized control trial aimed to compare the effects of structured versus verbal education on anxiety and satisfaction in patients undergoing uroflowmetry. Methodology: A single-blind, parallel-arm study will include 48 patients, which will be randomized into structured (brochure) and verbal counseling groups. The modified Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS-M) will assess anxiety, while satisfaction will be measured by using a questionnaire adapted from Dogun et al. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and independent t-tests will be employed for data analysis in spss 23.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable anxiety
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable anxiety
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2025
CompletedJuly 11, 2025
July 1, 2025
7 months
June 5, 2025
July 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of level of anxiety using modified Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS-M) in both groups receiving verbal or structured education
Assess level of anxiety by APAIS-M. The score for this tool will minimum be 3 and a maximum be 15 and results will be categorized into three groups; 3-6 no anxiety, 7-10 moderate anxiety, 11-15 severe anxiety
Will be assessed immediately after counselling by either verbal or structured education in peri investigation period.
To compare patient satisfaction by patient satisfaction form after uroflowmtery
It is an objective assessment of patient satisfaction with provided knowledge by the health care provider. This tool is taken from a study published in 2022 as there is no validated questionnaire available to date to assess satisfaction in patients undergoing uroflowmetry.
Will be assessed immediately after performing uroflowmetry test (post investigation period) in both groups receiving counselling either through verbal or structured education.
Study Arms (2)
Structured education group
EXPERIMENTALStructurally counselled group
Verbally counselled group
NO INTERVENTIONVerbally counselled group
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years and above
- Undergoing uroflowmetry for the first time
- Patients, who can hear, read and comprehend the education in either Urdu or English language.
You may not qualify if:
- Language barrier
- Known psychiatric illness
- Unable to comprehend instructions due to any neurological issue
- Unable to void adequate volume even after 3 attempts
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aga khan university hospital
Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan
Related Publications (6)
Manzoor F, Wei L, Hussain A, Asif M, Shah SIA. Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services; An Application of Physician's Behavior as a Moderator. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 9;16(18):3318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183318.
PMID: 31505840BACKGROUNDKhavari R, Gu C, Tran AC, Chan R. Trained and dedicated staff appears to be the main factor in decreasing anxiety and improving overall satisfaction during urodynamic testing: A prospective, randomized trial. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 May-Jun;10(5-6):187-190. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3421.
PMID: 27713797BACKGROUNDRubilotta E, Balzarro M, Castellani D, Tiso L, Panunzio A, Pirola GM, Antonelli A, Giannantoni A, Gubbiotti M. The Role of Emotional Condition in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Performing Uroflowmetry. Urology. 2021 Feb;148:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.045. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
PMID: 33217454BACKGROUNDDawidek MT, Singla R, Spooner L, Ho L, Nguan C. Clinical validation of an audio-based uroflowmetry application in adult males. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Mar;16(3):E120-E125. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7362.
PMID: 34672935BACKGROUNDZhang AY, Xu X. Prevalence, Burden, and Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men Aged 50 and Older: A Systematic Review of the Literature. SAGE Open Nurs. 2018 Dec 26;4:2377960818811773. doi: 10.1177/2377960818811773. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
PMID: 33415211BACKGROUNDDogan S. Comparison of Self-Conducted and Assistant-Supervised Uroflowmetry Methods. Cureus. 2022 Feb 8;14(2):e22030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22030. eCollection 2022 Feb.
PMID: 35282527BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ramna Nadeem, FCPS
Aga Khan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident/ Trainee in Urology department (Principal investigator))
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2025
First Posted
July 9, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
July 15, 2025
Study Completion
July 15, 2025
Last Updated
July 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Will might not share IPD