Intermittent vs Continuous Enteral Nutrition in Glycaemic Control of Diabetic ICU Patients
The Effects of Intermittent and Continuous Enteral Nutrition on Glycaemic Control andSome Metabolic Parameters in Adult Critical Patients With Diabetes Receiving Clinical Nutritional Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if intermittent or continuous enteral nutrition applications can improve glycemic control and affect certain metabolic parameters in adult critically ill patients with diabetes receiving clinical nutrition therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does intermittent enteral nutrition lead to better glycemic control compared to continuous enteral nutrition? How do intermittent and continuous enteral nutrition applications affect metabolic parameters such as serum insulin levels, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers? Researchers will compare intermittent and continuous enteral nutrition groups to see if one method is more effective in improving glycemic control and metabolic outcomes. Participants will: Receive either intermittent or continuous enteral nutrition as part of their clinical nutrition therapy Have regular blood tests to monitor blood glucose, insulin, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers Be monitored for glycemic variability and metabolic changes during their ICU stay
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Dec 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2025
CompletedJuly 8, 2025
June 1, 2025
7 months
May 26, 2025
June 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Blood Glucose Levels (mg/dL)
The primary outcome measure will be the effect of continuous versus intermittent enteral nutrition on glycemic control in critically ill diabetic patients. Blood glucose levels will be monitored 5 times per day using a glucose meter (GlucoNavii, Korea). Measurements will be taken at the following times: 06:00, 11:00, 16:00, 21:00, and 01:00.
Five measurements per day at 06:00, 11:00, 16:00, 21:00, and 01:00, for 7 consecutive days
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Serum Triglyceride Levels (mg/dL)
Baseline (Day 1) and Day 7
Serum Cholesterol Levels (mg/dL)
Baseline (Day 1) and Day 7
Serum Albumin Levels (g/dL)
Daily measurements for 7 consecutive days
Serum CRP (C-Reactive Protein) Levels (mg/L)
Daily measurements for 7 consecutive days
Serum Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) Levels (U/L)
Daily measurements for 7 consecutive days
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Continuous Enteral Nutrition Group (CE)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm received continuous enteral nutrition based on the existing hospital protocol. After reaching 80% of the target energy requirements without signs of feeding intolerance, patients were provided with diabetic-specific enteral formula administered continuously. Energy needs were calculated using the ESPEN guideline (25 kcal/kg/day).
Intermittent Enteral Nutrition (IE)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm received intermittent enteral nutrition as part of the study protocol. After reaching 80% of the target energy requirements without signs of feeding intolerance, patients were provided with diabetic-specific enteral formula administered in 5 discrete sessions across the 24-hour period, with scheduled breaks between feeding sessions. Energy needs were calculated using the ESPEN guideline (25 kcal/kg/day). This intervention was designed to compare the effects of intermittent feeding schedules against continuous feeding in critically ill diabetic patients.
Interventions
Intermittent Enteral Nutrition (IE): The intervention involves intermittent enteral nutrition using a diabetic-specific enteral formula, administered in 5 separate sessions daily with scheduled breaks between feedings. Each feeding session is followed by a break (1-2 hours). Energy needs are calculated based on the ESPEN guideline (25 kcal/kg/day). This protocol is designed to assess the effects of intermittent feeding in critically ill diabetic patients.
Continuous Enteral Nutrition (CE): The intervention involves continuous enteral nutrition provided via a diabetic-specific enteral formula, administered 24 hours a day with 1-hour breaks between feeding sessions. The feeding rate starts at 40cc per hour and is gradually increased based on tolerance. Energy needs are calculated using the ESPEN guideline (25 kcal/kg/day).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or older
- Diagnosis of diabetes
- Receiving enteral nutrition
- Indication for at least 7 days of ICU admission to perform the study
You may not qualify if:
- Under 18 years old
- Having specific needs that would require a completely different type of treatment, such as cancer or cystic fibrosis
- Pregnancy
- Expected to stay in the ICU for less than 7 days
- Receiving oral feeding or TPN (Total Parenteral Nutrition)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hacettepe Universitylead
- Ankara Training and Research Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Altındağ, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Ren CJ, Yao B, Tuo M, Lin H, Wan XY, Pang XF. Comparison of sequential feeding and continuous feeding on the blood glucose of critically ill patients: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Jul 20;134(14):1695-1700. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001684.
PMID: 34397596BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Aslı Akyol Mutlu, Prof.
Hacettepe University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants were blinded to group assignment. Neither the continuous (CE) nor intermittent (IE) feeding method was disclosed to the patients due to their critical illness status. However, care providers, investigators, and outcome assessors were aware of the group assignments.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dietitian
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2025
First Posted
July 8, 2025
Study Start
December 2, 2023
Primary Completion
June 16, 2024
Study Completion
June 16, 2024
Last Updated
July 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Although ethical approval was obtained for the study, the individual participant data (IPD) were not anonymized during data entry and were recorded in SPSS with identifiable information such as names and surnames. Therefore, due to concerns regarding participant confidentiality and data protection, there is no plan to share the IPD.