NCT07054476

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if intermittent or continuous enteral nutrition applications can improve glycemic control and affect certain metabolic parameters in adult critically ill patients with diabetes receiving clinical nutrition therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does intermittent enteral nutrition lead to better glycemic control compared to continuous enteral nutrition? How do intermittent and continuous enteral nutrition applications affect metabolic parameters such as serum insulin levels, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers? Researchers will compare intermittent and continuous enteral nutrition groups to see if one method is more effective in improving glycemic control and metabolic outcomes. Participants will: Receive either intermittent or continuous enteral nutrition as part of their clinical nutrition therapy Have regular blood tests to monitor blood glucose, insulin, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers Be monitored for glycemic variability and metabolic changes during their ICU stay

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 2, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 16, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 16, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 26, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Intensive carecontinuous enteral nutritionintermittent enteral nutritiondiabetesmetabolic parameters

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Blood Glucose Levels (mg/dL)

    The primary outcome measure will be the effect of continuous versus intermittent enteral nutrition on glycemic control in critically ill diabetic patients. Blood glucose levels will be monitored 5 times per day using a glucose meter (GlucoNavii, Korea). Measurements will be taken at the following times: 06:00, 11:00, 16:00, 21:00, and 01:00.

    Five measurements per day at 06:00, 11:00, 16:00, 21:00, and 01:00, for 7 consecutive days

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Serum Triglyceride Levels (mg/dL)

    Baseline (Day 1) and Day 7

  • Serum Cholesterol Levels (mg/dL)

    Baseline (Day 1) and Day 7

  • Serum Albumin Levels (g/dL)

    Daily measurements for 7 consecutive days

  • Serum CRP (C-Reactive Protein) Levels (mg/L)

    Daily measurements for 7 consecutive days

  • Serum Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) Levels (U/L)

    Daily measurements for 7 consecutive days

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Continuous Enteral Nutrition Group (CE)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this arm received continuous enteral nutrition based on the existing hospital protocol. After reaching 80% of the target energy requirements without signs of feeding intolerance, patients were provided with diabetic-specific enteral formula administered continuously. Energy needs were calculated using the ESPEN guideline (25 kcal/kg/day).

Other: Continuous Enteral Nutrition (CE)

Intermittent Enteral Nutrition (IE)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm received intermittent enteral nutrition as part of the study protocol. After reaching 80% of the target energy requirements without signs of feeding intolerance, patients were provided with diabetic-specific enteral formula administered in 5 discrete sessions across the 24-hour period, with scheduled breaks between feeding sessions. Energy needs were calculated using the ESPEN guideline (25 kcal/kg/day). This intervention was designed to compare the effects of intermittent feeding schedules against continuous feeding in critically ill diabetic patients.

Other: Intermittent Enteral Nutrition

Interventions

Intermittent Enteral Nutrition (IE): The intervention involves intermittent enteral nutrition using a diabetic-specific enteral formula, administered in 5 separate sessions daily with scheduled breaks between feedings. Each feeding session is followed by a break (1-2 hours). Energy needs are calculated based on the ESPEN guideline (25 kcal/kg/day). This protocol is designed to assess the effects of intermittent feeding in critically ill diabetic patients.

Intermittent Enteral Nutrition (IE)

Continuous Enteral Nutrition (CE): The intervention involves continuous enteral nutrition provided via a diabetic-specific enteral formula, administered 24 hours a day with 1-hour breaks between feeding sessions. The feeding rate starts at 40cc per hour and is gradually increased based on tolerance. Energy needs are calculated using the ESPEN guideline (25 kcal/kg/day).

Continuous Enteral Nutrition Group (CE)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Diagnosis of diabetes
  • Receiving enteral nutrition
  • Indication for at least 7 days of ICU admission to perform the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years old
  • Having specific needs that would require a completely different type of treatment, such as cancer or cystic fibrosis
  • Pregnancy
  • Expected to stay in the ICU for less than 7 days
  • Receiving oral feeding or TPN (Total Parenteral Nutrition)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Training and Research Hospital

Ankara, Altındağ, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ren CJ, Yao B, Tuo M, Lin H, Wan XY, Pang XF. Comparison of sequential feeding and continuous feeding on the blood glucose of critically ill patients: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Jul 20;134(14):1695-1700. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001684.

    PMID: 34397596BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Aslı Akyol Mutlu, Prof.

    Hacettepe University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants were blinded to group assignment. Neither the continuous (CE) nor intermittent (IE) feeding method was disclosed to the patients due to their critical illness status. However, care providers, investigators, and outcome assessors were aware of the group assignments.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study used a parallel assignment model in which participants were randomized into two separate intervention groups: Continuous Enteral Nutrition (CE) and Intermittent Enteral Nutrition (IE). Each participant remained in their assigned group for the entire 7-day intervention period without crossover between groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dietitian

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2025

First Posted

July 8, 2025

Study Start

December 2, 2023

Primary Completion

June 16, 2024

Study Completion

June 16, 2024

Last Updated

July 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Although ethical approval was obtained for the study, the individual participant data (IPD) were not anonymized during data entry and were recorded in SPSS with identifiable information such as names and surnames. Therefore, due to concerns regarding participant confidentiality and data protection, there is no plan to share the IPD.

Locations