Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Bimanual Therapy for Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation
Development of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Combined With Machine-assisted Bimanual Therapy (BT) in Upper Limb Rehabilitation
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with machine-assisted bimanual therapy (BT) can improve upper limb function in stroke patients. The participants will be individuals aged 40-80 years who have experienced a first-time ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the combined therapy enhance motor recovery compared to traditional rehabilitation methods?
- Are changes in brain activity associated with improvements in upper limb function? Participants will be randomly assigned to different groups and will:
- Receive rTMS stimulation on specific areas of the brain to modulate neural activity,
- Perform machine-assisted bimanual exercises to promote motor skills, and
- Undergo assessments before, immediately after, and during follow-up periods to measure functional improvements.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2027
July 8, 2025
May 1, 2025
2 years
June 8, 2025
June 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
This assessment captures motor recovery across four specific domains: Part A (proximal upper limb-shoulder, elbow, and forearm), Part B (wrist), Part C (hand), and Part D (coordination and speed). The full scale ranges from 0 to 66 and the higher scores represent the better outcome.
Evaluated at before and after (immediately following the final sessions) the intervention. Additionally, follow-up assessments are conducted at 1 month and 3 months post-treatment to evaluate sustained effects.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Evaluated at before and after (immediately following the final sessions) the intervention. Additionally, follow-up assessments are conducted at 1 month and 3 months post-treatment to evaluate sustained effects.
Upper Extremities Muscle Strength
Evaluated at before and after (immediately following the final sessions) the intervention. Additionally, follow-up assessments are conducted at 1 month and 3 months post-treatment to evaluate sustained effects.
Action Reach Arm Test (ARAT)
Evaluated at before and after (immediately following the final sessions) the intervention. Additionally, follow-up assessments are conducted at 1 month and 3 months post-treatment to evaluate sustained effects.
Brunnstrom Recovery Stage
Evaluated at before and after (immediately following the final sessions) the intervention. Additionally, follow-up assessments are conducted at 1 month and 3 months post-treatment to evaluate sustained effects.
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADLs)
Evaluated at before and after (immediately following the final sessions) the intervention. Additionally, follow-up assessments are conducted at 1 month and 3 months post-treatment to evaluate sustained effects.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control group
SHAM COMPARATOR15 mins self-initiated stretching exercise + 50 mins conventional occupational therapy
rTMS-only group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR15 mins rTMS and 50 mins conventional occupational therapy
rTMS combined with bimanual therapy group
EXPERIMENTAL15 mins therapy (rTMS + bimanual therapy) and 50 mins conventional occupational therapy
Interventions
Standard occupational therapy focused on improving daily functional skills through task-specific training and adaptive techniques.
Techniques involving passive or active stretching of muscles to enhance flexibility, reduce spasticity, and prevent contractures.
Non-invasive brain stimulation method using magnetic pulses to modulate cortical excitability and promote neural plasticity.
A training approach that involves simultaneous use of both hands to enhance coordination and functional hand movements through guided exercises, including device-assisted and robot-assisted therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 40-80 years;
- First-onset stroke patients;
- Patients diagnosed with cerebral infarction or hemorrhage through CT or MRI;
- Signed informed consent form by the patient and their family;
- Stable physiological parameters;
- Stroke occurred within the last 12 months;
- Patients with unilateral hand function impairment caused by the stroke;
- Upper limb muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale, MAS) less than 3 points;
- Able to follow two-step commands.
You may not qualify if:
- A history of epilepsy or family history of epilepsy;
- Presence of suicidal tendencies;
- Currently using medications that lower the seizure threshold;
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant;
- Co-existing neurological diseases (such as multiple sclerosis, other neurodegenerative diseases, meningitis, brain abscess, or meningioma);
- Subjects with uncontrollable migraines caused by elevated intracranial pressure;
- Subjects taking antidepressants who cannot discontinue the medication;
- Subjects with sleep disorders during rTMS treatment;
- Subjects with cerebellar stroke or brainstem stroke;
- Cerebral ischemic disorders resulting from traumatic brain injury;
- Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs);
- History of bleeding tendency and other conditions affecting upper limb function, such as myasthenia gravis, systemic immune neuropathy, severe epilepsy, endocrine system disorders, wearers of external or internal cardiac pacemakers, individuals with metallic implants or orthopedic devices;
- Co-existing severe heart, liver, kidney dysfunction, or other serious physical illnesses;
- Subjects with impaired consciousness who cannot cooperate with examinations or treatments, such as those with mental disorders, or those with intellectual or cognitive impairments, severe dementia;
- Presence of implanted electronic devices in the body;
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
Taoyuan District, Taiwan
Related Publications (15)
Kim WS, Paik NJ. Safety Review for Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Brain Neurorehabil. 2021 Mar 18;14(1):e6. doi: 10.12786/bn.2021.14.e6. eCollection 2021 Mar.
PMID: 36742107RESULTOberman L, Edwards D, Eldaief M, Pascual-Leone A. Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;28(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318205135f.
PMID: 21221011RESULTLiu C, Li L, Li B, Liu Z, Xing W, Zhu K, Jin W, Lin S, Tan W, Ren L, Zhang Q. Efficacy and Safety of Theta Burst Versus Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Neuromodulation. 2024 Jun;27(4):701-710. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
PMID: 37831019RESULTHuang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033.
PMID: 15664172RESULTLi X, Lin YL, Cunningham DA, Wolf SL, Sakaie K, Conforto AB, Machado AG, Mohan A, O'Laughlin K, Wang X, Widina M, Plow EB. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Contralesional Dorsal Premotor Cortex for Upper Extremity Motor Improvement in Severe Stroke: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;51(5):557-564. doi: 10.1159/000521514. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
PMID: 35051941RESULTChen YM, Lai SS, Pei YC, Hsieh CJ, Chang WH. Development of a Novel Task-oriented Rehabilitation Program using a Bimanual Exoskeleton Robotic Hand. J Vis Exp. 2020 May 20;(159). doi: 10.3791/61057.
PMID: 32510515RESULTHuang JJ, Pei YC, Chen YY, Tseng SS, Hung JW. Bilateral Sensorimotor Cortical Communication Modulated by Multiple Hand Training in Stroke Participants: A Single Training Session Pilot Study. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;9(12):727. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9120727.
PMID: 36550934RESULTChen JL, Ros T, Gruzelier JH. Dynamic changes of ICA-derived EEG functional connectivity in the resting state. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Apr;34(4):852-68. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21475. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
PMID: 22344782RESULTLyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483-92. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001. No abstract available.
PMID: 7333761RESULTDe Weerdt WJG, Harrison MA. "Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: a comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the Action Research Arm test. Physiotherapy Canada. 1985; 37:65-70.
RESULTCrow JL, Lincoln NB, Nouri FM, De Weerdt W. The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1989 Oct-Dec;11(4):155-60. doi: 10.3109/03790798909166667.
PMID: 2701823RESULTCARROLL D. A QUANTITATIVE TEST OF UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION. J Chronic Dis. 1965 May;18:479-91. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(65)90030-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 14293031RESULTMathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386.
PMID: 3160243RESULTFugl-Meyer AR. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1980;7:85-93. No abstract available.
PMID: 6932734RESULTFugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
PMID: 1135616RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2025
First Posted
July 8, 2025
Study Start
July 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Last Updated
July 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL