Periodontal Effects of Orthodontic Mini-Screws
Periodontal Health and Orthodontic Mini-screws: A Cross-sectional Study
1 other identifier
observational
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orthodontic mini-screws (TADs) are commonly used to provide temporary anchorage and prevent unwanted tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Their clinical success largely depends on their ability to remain stable under functional orthodontic loads. Stability is assessed in two phases: primary stability, which reflects immediate mechanical retention in bone, and secondary stability, which results from biological remodeling and healing over time. Multiple factors such as age, gender, bone characteristics, screw dimensions, and force magnitude may influence screw stability. Recent studies suggest that local inflammation around mini-screws, similar to peri-implantitis in dental implants, can compromise bone integrity and lead to screw failure. Inadequate oral hygiene and the absence of keratinized tissue at the insertion site are among the key risk factors associated with inflammation and soft tissue complications. Unlike traditional implants, mini-screws are often inserted at variable intraoral locations and subject to angular force vectors, which may further impact surrounding periodontal tissues. This cross-sectional clinical study aims to evaluate the effects of orthodontic mini-screw placement on general oral health and periodontal tissue status. The study will investigate site-specific and full-mouth periodontal parameters and explore potential associations between mini-screw stability, soft tissue characteristics, and signs of mucosal inflammation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2025
CompletedJuly 7, 2025
June 1, 2025
7 months
June 29, 2025
June 29, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
Mean PPD measured at six sites around each of the two teeth adjacent to the mini-screw, using a UNC-15 periodontal probe. Values are averaged per site to assess localized periodontal response. This measurement also done for full-mouth teeth.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Plaque Index (PI)
Plaque accumulation assessed visually on the buccal and lingual surfaces of teeth adjacent to the mini-screw and for full-mouth teeth using the Löe and Silness Index. Values averaged across sites.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Gingival Index (GI)
Gingival inflammation assessed using the Löe and Silness Gingival Index at the six surfaces of the adjacent teeth and full mouth seperately. Scores averaged to evaluate site-specific soft tissue response.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
Presence or absence of bleeding recorded at six sites per adjacent tooth and full mouth teeth immediately after gentle probing. The percentage of bleeding sites is calculated to assess inflammation.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Gingival Recession Depth (RD)
Distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the free gingival margin measured at six sites of adjacent teeth. Mean values indicate apical migration of the gingiva.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Mucosal Redness (MR)
Clinical assessment of redness in the mucosa surrounding the mini-screw, based on visual inspection. Recorded as present or absent.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Mucosal Discomfort (MD)
Self-reported discomfort or sensitivity around the mini-screw site, recorded during the clinical examination. Binary outcome (present or absent).
3 months after mini-screw placement
Keratinized Tissue Width (KTW)
Horizontal and vertical keratinized tissue widths measured using a periodontal probe in millimeters. Recorded to evaluate soft tissue protection at the site.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Supracrestal Tissue Height (STH)
Vertical height from the alveolar crest to the gingival margin measured at the mini-screw site using a periodontal probe. Indicates soft tissue volume and attachment.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Transmucosal Soft Tissue Thickness (Phenotype)
Measured using a periodontal probe to determine whether the phenotype is thick or thin. Helps assess how mucosal type influences peri-screw tissue response.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Torque Gauge (TG) Value
Stability of each mini-screw measured using a torque gauge. Values recorded in Newtons to assess biomechanical resistance of the screw at 3-month follow-up.
3 months after mini-screw placement
Interventions
Comprehensive site-level and full-mouth evaluations of periodontal parameters, including plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), recession depth (RD), bleeding on probing (BOP), keratinized tissue width (KTW), mucosal phenotype, mucosal redness (MR), mucosal discomfort (MD), and torque gauge (TG) measurements.
Eligibility Criteria
The study included patients who had been treated with orthodontic mini implants at the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Altinbas University. A total of 132 patients were included in the study.
You may qualify if:
- Systemically healthy individuals; non-smokers; patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment requiring mini-screw anchorage; periodontally healthy (bleeding on probing \<10%); no clinical signs of gingival inflammation at the time of mini-screw placement; provided written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- History of systemic disease (e.g., diabetes, immunosuppression); current use of antibiotics, corticosteroids, or other medications affecting periodontal health; history of radiation therapy in the head and neck region; poor oral hygiene or visible plaque accumulation at baseline; pregnant or breastfeeding women; presence of active periodontal disease (e.g., PPD \>3 mm, BOP \>10%); previous orthodontic mini-screw failure in the same site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Altinbas University, Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul, Bakırköy, 34147, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Yildiz MS, Ulutas PA, Ozenci I, Akcali A. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the association between orthodontic mini-screws and periodontal health. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1376. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05136-2.
PMID: 39543578BACKGROUNDParmar R, Reddy V, Reddy SK, Reddy D. Determination of soft tissue thickness at orthodontic miniscrew placement sites using ultrasonography for customizing screw selection. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Oct;150(4):651-658. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.026.
PMID: 27692423BACKGROUNDPark HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jul;130(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032.
PMID: 16849067BACKGROUNDZitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Spontaneous progression of experimentally induced periimplantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):845-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00567.x.
PMID: 15367187BACKGROUNDAlgraffee H, Borumandi F, Cascarini L. Peri-implantitis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;50(8):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.020. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
PMID: 22197573BACKGROUNDLee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kim TW. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.031.
PMID: 20152674BACKGROUNDUre DS, Oliver DR, Kim KB, Melo AC, Buschang PH. Stability changes of miniscrew implants over time. Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):994-1000. doi: 10.2319/120810-711.1. Epub 2011 May 25.
PMID: 21612317BACKGROUNDRaghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):425-31.
PMID: 15973954BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mehmet Selim YILDIZ, Asst. Prof.
Altinbas University, Faculty of Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2025
First Posted
July 7, 2025
Study Start
October 4, 2024
Primary Completion
April 25, 2025
Study Completion
April 29, 2025
Last Updated
July 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Researchers can request access to the IPD by contacting Dr. Mehmet Selim Yildiz at "mehmet.yildiz2@altinbas.edu.tr or mehmetselimyildiz4@gmail.com"