The Airports, Air Quality, and Asthma (AAA) Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
For children with asthma, exposure to indoor air pollution increases the risk of a serious asthma exacerbation, which can be life-threatening. Interventions aimed at improving indoor air quality, including use of a portable air cleaner with a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter, can reduce this risk, but the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of HEPA air cleaners varies by setting. In collaboration with a community health worker (CHW) delivered asthma education program, the investigators are conducting a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of HEPA air cleaners to improve indoor air quality and child asthma health in South King County of Washington state, a vulnerable community impacted by air pollution from airports and highway traffic. Key features of the Airports, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) design include integration of CHWs into study procedures, including CHWs recruited from community-based organizations, into multiple aspects of the trial protocol. The investigators aim to recruit up to N=60 children with asthma randomized into intervention and control groups in a 1:1 ratio, conduct baseline assessments of indoor air quality and airway health, and collect repeated assessments of air quality and airway health during the three-month intervention period and after the trial concludes. Study findings will inform future approaches to integrate HEPA air cleaners into existing CHW asthma education programs in this and similar communities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
July 2, 2025
June 1, 2025
2 years
June 4, 2025
June 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Symptom days over 7 days
Symptom days were assessed through brief weekly online surveys sent to caregivers. A symptom-day was defined as any day in the past week when the child had asthma symptoms or used quick-relief medication. Caregivers reported the number of days with symptoms (e.g., coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, nighttime awakenings), any unscheduled medical visits, and whether the child had a respiratory infection. They also noted how many nights the child slept at home, any issues with the indoor air cleaner, and its usage frequency. Symptom scores ranged from 0 to 7, with high scores indicating more days experienced for that symptom. Study staff monitored the weekly caregiver survey to ensure that the child's symptoms were not worsening over the course of the study.
Repeated measure, assessed on a weekly basis throughout the 3 month observation period.
Change in Asthma Control Score
The Child Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) is a short seven-question survey used to characterize child asthma control based on parent and child report of symptoms over the prior 30 days. The C-ACT has been validated for ages 4-11 years old and shown to have good psychometric properties. A C-ACT score is calculated based on responses, ranging from 0 to 27, with higher values reflecting better asthma control, and a score of 19 or lower considered to reflect inadequate, or "poor," control. This test is administered at the beginning and at the end of the research study. The change in child Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) score between baseline and post-intervention is used to assess the benefit of reducing indoor air pollution in the child's bedroom. Study team staff review responses on the baseline survey to address missing data or participant confusion during the study visit.
From the baseline visit until the end of study follow-up, 3 months later.
Study Arms (2)
Effective portable air cleaner (HEPA)
EXPERIMENTALDuring the baseline home visit, a Winix 9800 air cleaner is installed in the child's bedroom and paired with data logging energy use monitor as well as air quality monitor. Households randomized to the intervention group receive an air cleaner with a pre-filter, carbon filter, and with the HEPA air filter pre-installed.
Control portable air cleaner (less effective).
SHAM COMPARATORDuring the baseline home visit, a Winix 9800 air cleaner is installed in the child's bedroom. In the sham group, the Winix 9800 true HEPA filter and activated carbon filter which were removed via an internal modification not visible to the user. The air cleaner still included a washable fine mesh pre-filter that captures large airborne particles. Households randomized to the sham group receive an air cleaner with only the pre-filter and without the carbon filter, and HEPA air filter.
Interventions
The Winix 9800 is a true HEPA air cleaner that has been AHAM (Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers) Verifide® for rooms that are 500 square feet in size. The air cleaner has a washable fine mesh pre-filter that captures large airborne particles, an activated carbon filter that reduces volatile organic compounds and odors, and a true HEPA filter that captures 99.99% of airborne allergens as small as 0.003 microns in size.
Winix 9800 air cleaner, with data logging energy use monitor is installed in the child's bedroom. In the sham group, the Winix 9800 true HEPA filter and activated carbon filter were removed. This was an internal modification and not visible to the user. The air cleaner still included a washable fine mesh pre-filter that captures large airborne particles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Child is 6-12 years old with a health care provider-diagnosed asthma.
- Caregiver is comfortable in participating in all study activities in English (communicating with study staff by phone and completing online surveys).
- Caregiver is familiar with the child's daily asthma health.
- Residence within 10 miles of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport as determined by zip code
- Child resides in caregiver's home at least five nights a week on a regular basis and has no plans to move in the next three months.
You may not qualify if:
- Child has severe asthma at baseline. Severe asthma was defined in consultation with pediatric pulmonologists to be caregiver-reported asthma symptoms every day over the past 14 days and/or two or more inpatient hospitalizations for asthma in the past 12 months.
- Households were excluded if there were multiple individuals within the same household with asthma eligible for the King County CHW Asthma Program or had severe asthma.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Related Publications (2)
Loftus CT, Lim P, Capps J, Shirai JH, Tchong-French M, Austin E. The Airport Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) indoor air intervention trial for children with asthma: Protocol for a community-based study in South King County, Washington State. Trials. 2025 Nov 27;26(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09286-8.
PMID: 41310837DERIVEDLoftus C, Lim P, Capps J, Shirai J, Tchong-French M, Austin E. The Airport, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) Indoor Air Intervention Trial for Children with Asthma: Protocol for a Community Based Study in South King County, Washington State. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2025 Sep 22:rs.3.rs-7181465. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7181465/v1.
PMID: 41041530DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elena Austin, Sc.D.
University of Washington
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Participants and CHWs are masked to intervention status. The research team, including those who attend the home visit or manage and analyze data, are not masked.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2025
First Posted
July 2, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The study protocol, analysis plan is currently being prepared as an open-source publication to be shared with other researchers. The clinical study report and analytic code will be shared with researchers through open-source publication.
- Access Criteria
- A data management plan is available through dmptool.org allowing researchers to identify and request data elements that are not available through open source mechanisms.
De-identified information on indoor and outdoor air quality over the course of the study period will be shared through an open source publication. De-identified weekly symptom questionnaire will be shared, however identifiable participant information including age, gender/sex and home address will be redacted.