Clinical Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Intraprocedural Needle Guidance Platform for Soft Tissue Biopsy
Clinical Evaluation of an Intra-procedural 3D Needle Guidance Platform for Soft Tissue Tumors or Organs Requiring Percutaneous Biopsy as an Adjunct to Standard Image Guidance
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This clinical feasibility evaluation is intended to further characterize and quantify the potential benefits of the FDA-cleared XR90 Augmented Reality (AR )imaging and guidance platform utilization in percutaneous soft tissue biopsy. This study will seek to build on the findings of safety, procedural benefits, and overall clinical feasibility shown in previous bench, cadaveric, and single-site clinical evaluations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
July 2, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.9 years
June 13, 2025
July 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time of Tumor Localization
The time from initiation of localization of imaging (defined by when the ultrasound probe is put into operator's hand) until operator has planned a trajectory and point of entry (by placing a finger or trocar on the skin entry site and verbalizing completion of localization) will be measured and recorded. Time is recorded in minutes and will be completed during the procedure.
Intraprocedural-from the start of the procedure until the end of the study procedure, 1 day.
Time From Skin to Target
The elapsed time from when the proceduralist inserts their trocar or biopsy needle through the skin (excluding skin knicks) and when the provider verbalizes they have reached their intended target in order to collect a biopsy under ultrasound guidance. Time will be recorded in minutes beginning and ending during the study procedure.
Intraprocedural, from the start of the procedure until the end of the study procedure, 1 day.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Technical Success
Duration of the study procedure
Needle Attempts
Duration of the study procedure
Study Arms (2)
Arm A, XR90 (Experimental Group)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomly assigned to this arm will undergo percutaneous biopsy procedures using the assistance of XR90 guidance system in adjunct to standard of care guidance.
Arm B (Standard of Care Group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomly assigned to this arm will undergo percutaneous biopsy with standard of care CT and ultrasound needle guidance only.
Interventions
Augmented Reality system in adjunct to standard of care guidance for needle guidance during a percutaneous biopsy
Ultrasound guided biopsy as a part of standard of care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years of age
- Willing and able to give informed consent prior to enrollment
- Subjects in need of a diagnostic soft-tissue tumor biopsy which is the primary target for needle placement as a part of their standard of care.
- Subjects who have met all criteria to undergo percutaneous biopsy with ultrasound.
- Subjects with soft-tissue lesions ≥1 cm or ≤8 cm in depth
- BMI of ≤40
You may not qualify if:
- Children under the age of 18.
- Currently pregnant at the time of the procedure
- Not willing or able to give informed consent.
- Subjects with pacemakers or AICDs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
MedStar Georgetown Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
MedStar Washington Hosptial Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Related Publications (2)
Al-Nimer S, Hanlon A, Cho K, Kalra-Lall A, Weunski C, Yanof J, West K, Martin C 3rd. 3D Holographic Guidance and Navigation for Percutaneous Ablation of Solid Tumor. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Mar;31(3):526-528. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.027. Epub 2020 Jan 31. No abstract available.
PMID: 32008844BACKGROUNDGadodia G, Yanof J, Hanlon A, Bustos S, Weunski C, West K, Martin C 3rd. Early Clinical Feasibility Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Platform for Guidance and Navigation during Percutaneous Tumor Ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Mar;33(3):333-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.11.014.
PMID: 35221048BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2025
First Posted
July 2, 2025
Study Start
June 27, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The trial evaluates a novel augmented reality needle guidance platform that includes investigational software features and procedural performance data. These elements are considered proprietary and form part of an active product development that may be incorporated as part of a broader regulatory strategy. In addition, the study's small sample size and highly structured procedural metrics - including EM tracking outputs, intraoperative timing, and device-specific workflow parameters - increase the risk of participant re-identification, even without direct identifiers or imaging. To protect intellectual property and ensure compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and FDA confidentiality provisions (21 CFR § 812.38; 21 CFR § 20.61), individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. Summary-level data and aggregate results will be made available through peer-reviewed publications and posted on ClinicalTrials.gov