Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Two Catheters (Xianrui Da and Medtronic) in Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Veins
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to systematically compare the clinical efficacy (venous closure rate and symptom relief rate), safety (perioperative and postoperative complications), and cost-effectiveness (direct medical costs) of domestic Xianruida radiofrequency catheter and imported Medtronic catheter in endovenous radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins through a single-center, prospective, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
July 1, 2025
June 1, 2025
1 year
February 15, 2025
June 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Venous Closure Rate at 12 Months Post-operation
The venous closure rate confirmed by ultrasound 12 months after surgery, categorized as complete closure (no blood flow signal) or partial closure (blood flow signal \< 10 cm).This classification is used to determine the difference in the effect of achieving venous occlusion between the two catheters. Unit of Measure: Percentage of closed veins (%)
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) Score from
3, 6, and 12 months
Change in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) from Baseline
3, 6, and 12 months
Change in CIVIQ-20 Score from Baseline
3, 6, and 12 months
Number of Intraoperative Complications
During surgery
Number of Postoperative Complications within 30 Days
12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group: Treatment of great saphenous vein varicosity using the Xianruida AcoArt Venous™
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group: Xianruida Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Participants will receive endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the Xianruida catheter. The procedure includes catheter insertion into the target vein under ultrasound guidance. Data on surgery date, limb position, treatment length, and device performance will be recorded.
Control Group: Treatment of great saphenous vein varicosity using the Medtronic ClosureFast™ endoven
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group: Medtronic ClosureFast™ Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Participants will undergo RFA using the Medtronic ClosureFast™ catheter. The procedure is similar to the experimental arm, with the same temperature and withdrawal speed settings. Data collected will include surgery date, limb position, treatment length, and device performance.
Interventions
1. Surgical Procedures: Standardized radiofrequency ablation (GSV/SSV closure) was carried out in both groups by the same team. Catheter parameters were set as 120°C and 1 cm/min withdrawal speed. The treatment segment of the great saphenous vein was required to be \>1 cm from the skin before anesthesia. For calf varicose veins, treatment was done after great saphenous vein ablation. * Experimental Group: Utilized Xianruida's catheter with advanced features. Surgical and device - related information was recorded. * Control Group: Used Medtronic's catheter. Similar data were recorded as in the experimental group. 2. Postoperative Management: Consistent for both groups. * Compression: Applied elastic bandage + Class II compression stockings. * Medication: Patients took oral anticoagulants and painkillers as needed, with usage details recorded during follow - up.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 80 years old.
- Clinically diagnosed with primary lower extremity varicose veins, with CEAP grade C2 - C5, and requiring treatment of the great saphenous vein segment.
- Doppler ultrasound confirms that the reflux time of the saphenofemoral vein valve is \> 1.0 second.
- Doppler ultrasound confirms that the diameter of the great saphenous vein in the supine position is \> 3mm and \< 12mm.
- Only one limb of each patient is included in the study.
- The patient signs the informed consent form and is willing to cooperate with the examinations and follow - ups specified in the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Thrombosis in the great saphenous vein, or combined with deep vein thrombosis, or a history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.
- Recurrent varicose veins after previous treatment.
- Severe tortuosity of the great saphenous vein, with the expectation that the catheter cannot pass through.
- Severe lower extremity ischemia (CLI).
- Known allergy to drugs or device materials involved in the study.
- History of cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator implantation.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Currently participating in other drug or device studies.
- Deemed unsuitable for endovenous treatment by the researcher.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China
Related Publications (4)
Farah MH, Nayfeh T, Urtecho M, Hasan B, Amin M, Sen I, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Lawrence PF, Gloviczki P, Murad MH. A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Sep;10(5):1155-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
PMID: 34450355BACKGROUNDGloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, Gloviczki ML, Lohr JM, McLafferty RB, Meissner MH, Murad MH, Padberg FT, Pappas PJ, Passman MA, Raffetto JD, Vasquez MA, Wakefield TW; Society for Vascular Surgery; American Venous Forum. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5 Suppl):2S-48S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.079.
PMID: 21536172BACKGROUNDZhai Y, Lu YM, Lu W, Yang C. Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Ann Ital Chir. 2022;93:235-240.
PMID: 35503057BACKGROUNDTang MJ, Zhou LY, Jia XJ, Wu JJ, Lou YB, Jin MJ, Zhu YF. [Randomized controlled study on the application effect of a new type of intravenous radiofrequency closed therapy system made in China and an imported system]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 1;62(3):223-228. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20231012-00167. Chinese.
PMID: 38291638BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Vascular Surgery in ChengduUTCM
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2025
First Posted
July 1, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share