MicrOwave and laSer ablaTion Study (MOST Study)
MOST
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Validate the Safety and Efficacy of Microwave Versus Laser Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients With Varicose Veins
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To validate the safety and efficacy of microwave versus laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins of lower extremities
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2022
CompletedMarch 23, 2022
October 1, 2021
1.7 years
January 22, 2021
March 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the complete closure rate of great saphenous vein at 6 months after surgery
Complete closure: Doppler ultrasonography showed that the target vein segment of the entire treatment is closed, with no discontinuous unclosed segment more than 5 cm. Calculation method: Complete closure rate = number of subjects with complete closure of target vein in the group/total number of subjects in the same group × 100%. The B-ultrasound check is performed on subjects 6 months after the surgery for whether the target vein is completely closed, the result is recorded. After the trial is completed, the number of subjects whose target vein is completely closed is counted, and the complete closure rate of great saphenous vein is calculated.
6 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (6)
the complete closure rate of great saphenous vein at 12 months after surgery
12 months after surgery
surgical success rate
immediately after surgery
device performance evaluation
during or after surgery
changes of venous clinical severity score (VCSS) before and after treatment
screening period, 30days, 3 months, 6months, 12 months after surgery
changes of Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score before and after treatment
screening period, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
treatment group
EXPERIMENTALMicrowave Ablation Therapeutic Apparatus. Patients with primary lower extremity varicose veins were treated with endovenous microwave therapy using Microwave Ablation Therapy Apparatus. Ultrasound examination and questionnaire survey(AVVQ and VCSS) were performed at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months,12 months after treatment,drug use and adverse events were recorded to assess complications and target lesion closure rate.
control group
EXPERIMENTALSemiconductor Laser Treatment Apparatus. Patients with primary lower extremity varicose veins were treated with endovenous laser treatment using Semiconductor Laser Treatment Apparatus. Ultrasound examination and questionnaire survey(AVVQ and VCSS) were performed at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after treatment,drug use and adverse events were recorded to assess complications and target lesion closure rate.
Interventions
The selected and qualified subjects with primary lower extremity varicose veins were randomly treated with microwave ablation equipment or laser treatment equipment. Subjects in the two groups were returned to the hospital for follow-up at 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery, respectively, for ultrasound examination and questionnaire evaluation, medication status and adverse events were recorded, and target lesion closure rate and subject satisfaction were evaluated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older, not older than 80 years, male or female
- Patients clinically diagnosed as primary great saphenous vein insufficiency with reflux lasting \> 0.5 seconds on duplex ultrasound
- Patients with CEAP grade C2-C6
- Patients who voluntarily participate in this trial, understand all the risks and benefits described in the informed consent document, and sign the written informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with diameter of target lesion vein \< 2 mm or \> 15 mm
- Patients with previous surgical treatment on the target lesion or patients with acute thrombosis
- Patients with deep vein thrombosis and superficial vein thrombosis
- Patients with acute systemic infectious diseases
- Patients with severe liver and kidney dysfunction (ALT \> 3 times the upper limit of normal value; creatinine \> 225 umol /L)
- Patients with known uncorrectable bleeding or severe coagulopathy
- Patients with anesthesia contraindications
- Patients with poorly controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg) and diabetes mellitus (fasting glucose ≥ 10.0 mmol / L)
- Patients with non-primary varicose veins caused by post-deep vein thrombosis syndrome, KT syndrome (Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome), arteriovenous fistula, etc.
- Patients with other diseases that may cause difficulty in conducting the trial or evaluation, such as mental illness, AIDS, malignant tumors, liver disease, cardiac insufficiency, etc. or patients whose life expectancy is less than 1 year
- Pregnant, lactating women, or those planning on becoming pregnant during the trial
- Patients who have participated in clinical trials of other drugs or medical devices in the past 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hosipital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 102218, China
Related Publications (1)
Li Y, Wu W, Li Y, Li J, Sun M. Efficacy and safety of endovenous microwave ablation versus laser ablation for great saphenous vein varicosis: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open. 2022 May 25;12(5):e059213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059213.
PMID: 35613801DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
weiwei Wu, M.D.
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2021
First Posted
January 27, 2021
Study Start
January 26, 2021
Primary Completion
September 28, 2022
Study Completion
September 28, 2022
Last Updated
March 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-10