Effect of Empathy-Based Program on Nursing Assistants in Long-term Care Facilities
The Effectiveness of Empathy-Based Program on Empathy Level Among Nursing Assistants in Long-term Care Facility
1 other identifier
interventional
103
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial aims to explore the impact of an Empathy-Based Program on the level of empathy among nursing assistants in a long-term care facility. A total of 100 participants will be divided into two groups: a virtual reality (VR) with debriefing group, and a control group (C) receiving routine care. The intervention involves a weekly 5-minute VR session featuring immersive experiences of residents' lives within the facility, followed by a 25-minute debriefing discussion in small groups of 5\~6 participants. This will continue for three weeks. The study will evaluate the effectiveness of the empathy program in enhancing nursing assistants' empathy levels, with data collection occurring at three time points: baseline, post-intervention, and one-month follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 10, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 25, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
February 25, 2026
December 1, 2025
1.1 years
June 23, 2025
January 28, 2026
February 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Empathy Level
This study will use the 20-item version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Professions version (JSE-HP). The scale has 20 items scored on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum), with a total score between 20 and 140. Higher scores indicate greater empathy level among nursing assistants.
Baseline (pre-intervention), end of intervention (week 3), and follow-up at one month post-intervention (week 7)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Attitudes Toward Older People
Baseline (pre-intervention), end of intervention (week 3), and follow-up at one month post-intervention (week 7)
Empathic Behavior
Baseline (pre-intervention), end of intervention (week 3), and follow-up at one month post-intervention (week 7)
Study Arms (2)
virtual reality (VR) with debriefing Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will engage with immersive virtual reality (VR) with debriefing.
Control Group (C)
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this group will continue their usual care routine without additional exposure to virtual.
Interventions
Participants will receive a weekly 5-minute VR session featuring immersive experiences of residents' lives within the facility, followed by a 25-minute debriefing discussion in small groups of 5\~6 participants. This will continue for three weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must meet all of the following criteria:
- Possess a valid nursing assistant license
- Aged 20 years or older
- Have worked at a long-term care institution for more than 3 months
- Able to read and understand written Chinese
You may not qualify if:
- Employed as a part-time nursing assistant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Medical University
Taipei, None Selected, 11031, Taiwan
Limitations and Caveats
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the study results. First, the study was conducted in a limited number of long-term care institutions in Taiwan, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other settings or populations. Second, outcomes were primarily measured using self-reported instruments, which may be subject to response bias. Third, the follow-up period was relatively short, and longer-term effects of the intervention could not be assessed. Finally, bli
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Principal Investigator (PI)
- Organization
- Taipei Medical University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessors were masked to group assignments to reduce assessment bias. No other parties were masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2025
First Posted
July 1, 2025
Study Start
November 10, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
February 25, 2026
Results First Posted
February 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share