A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Web-based Tool for Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients
A Study for Development and Testing of Fertility Preservation Decision Aid for Young Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
32
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
\[Background\] The number of young cancer patients is increasing, and they may experience impairment or loss of reproductive function due to cancer treatments such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Although various medical methods to preserve fertility have been developed, due to the complexity and medical specialization of these methods, there is an urgent need to support understanding and decision-making regarding these options in clinical practice. While referrals to fertility specialists for counseling are possible, most young cancer patients do not receive such consultations before treatment. Even those who do often report decisional conflict due to confusion about the information and difficulty in reflecting personal values in the decision-making process. Although decision aids have been developed in other countries, cultural, linguistic, and healthcare system differences make it difficult to apply these tools in Korea. Therefore, there is a need to develop a decision aid tailored to female cancer patients in Korea for use in local clinical settings to support fertility preservation decisions. \[Study Objective\] To develop a web-based decision aid and evaluate its impact on decisional conflict, fertility preservation-related knowledge, decision self-efficacy, depression, and quality of life, in order to assess the effectiveness of the decision aid. \[Study Hypothesis\] The use of a web-based decision aid for fertility preservation will: Reduce decisional conflict experienced by cancer patients during the decision-making process; Improve fertility preservation-related knowledge and decision self-efficacy; Reduce levels of depression and improve quality of life. \[Study Plan\]
- Randomized clinical study
- Prospective study
- Two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) 2\. Study Method Female cancer patients visiting the outpatient clinic of the National Cancer Center will be screened to determine eligibility based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients who meet the criteria and voluntarily agree to participate will be enrolled in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (who will use the decision aid) or the control group (who will receive standard cancer treatment as planned at the Cancer Center without any special tools). The decision aid will be provided to the intervention group immediately after randomization. The control group will not receive any additional tools. Outcomes will be measured at three time points for the intervention group: before the intervention (T0), one week after the intervention (T1), and one month after the intervention (T2). For the control group, measurements will be taken at the same time points: immediately after randomization (T0), one week later (T1), and one month later (T2).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJune 26, 2025
January 1, 2025
6 months
June 11, 2025
June 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decisional conflict score
Name of the measurement: Decisional conflict score assessed by the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Measurement tool: The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) - low literacy version Measure description: The level of decisional conflict experienced by participants regarding a health-related decision will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) - low literacy version, a validated 10-item questionnaire. Each item is rated on yes(0), unsure(2), no(4), and scores are converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater decisional conflict. The unit of measure will be the mean total score on the DCS at the specified timepoint. Subscale scores (e.g., uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, and effective decision) may also be calculated. Unit of measure: Mean scores range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict)
Before the intervention, one week after the intervention, and one month after the intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Knowledge about fertility preservation
Before the intervention, one week after the intervention, and one month after the intervention.
Depression severity
Before the intervention, one week after the intervention, and one month after the intervention.
Health-Related Quality of Life
Before the intervention, one week after the intervention, and one month after the intervention.
Decision-Making Confidence
Before the intervention, one week after the intervention, and one month after the intervention.
Counselling on fertility preservation
one month after the intervention
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONReceived only the planned cancer treatment without any additional intervention
Fertility preservation decision aid intervention group
EXPERIMENTALVisited the website containing the web-based decision aid regarding fertility preservation at least once before cancer treatment initiation to independently use the tool in a private setting
Interventions
Visited the website containing the web-based decision aid regarding fertility preservation at least once before cancer treatment initiation to independently use the tool in a private setting
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female cancer patients aged 18 to 40 who received treatment at the National Cancer Center between June 2025 and December 2025
- Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study
- Able to read, write, and communicate in Korean without difficulty
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had already lost fertility prior to participating in the study
- Patients who had already undergone, or were scheduled to undergo, a specific fertility preservation procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Jang J, Lee EM, Chung YK, Lee DO, Park HJ, Yim GW, Lee KS, Kim JH, Ko AR, Hong JH, Kang S. Development and pilot testing of a personalised decision aid for decision-making regarding fertility preservation in young female patients with cancer: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e090759. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090759.
PMID: 40803737DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2025
First Posted
June 26, 2025
Study Start
June 30, 2025
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
June 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared due to concerns about participant privacy and the potential risk of re-identification, especially given the sensitive nature of the data. In addition, there are no current resources or infrastructure in place to support secure data sharing.