NCT07037303

Brief Summary

Title: Comparison of Effectiveness Between Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) and Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP, Aerobika) Device Assisted Treatment in Patients With Bronchiectasis in Korea: A Randomized Controlled Trial Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) alone versus ACBT combined with an Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device (Aerobika) in patients with bronchiectasis. The goal is to determine whether the combination therapy reduces the frequency of acute exacerbations and improves patient symptoms compared to ACBT alone. Primary Questions: Does the use of ACBT plus Aerobika reduce the number of acute exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis who experience ≥3 exacerbations per year? What symptoms and adverse events are observed in participants using the Aerobika device? Study Design: This is a single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at Chungbuk National University Hospital in Korea. 100 adult patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis and having ≥3 acute exacerbations within 1 year will be enrolled and randomized into two groups (1:1): Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group The intervention period lasts 12 months, with clinic visits scheduled at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Participation Involves: Use of ACBT with or without Aerobika daily for 12 months In-person clinic visits every 1 to 3 months Monthly phone follow-ups to assess symptoms and adverse events Completion of questionnaires (mMRC, BHQ, CAT) and clinical tests including PFT and laboratory tests Tracking of exacerbation frequency, sputum volume, and quality

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
27mo left

Started Jul 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress28%
Jul 2025Jul 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 3, 2025

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 25, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2026

Expected
2.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2028

Last Updated

June 25, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

June 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

bronchiectasisaerobikaACBT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Frequency of Acute Exacerbations in Patients with Bronchiectasis

    Number of acute exacerbations experienced by patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis during the 12-month study period.

    12 months from baseline

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Improvement in subjective symptoms (1)

    Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

  • Improvement in subjective symptoms (2)

    Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

  • Improvement in subjective symptoms (3)

    Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

  • Improvement in objective assessment

    Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) measured in liters (L): 12 months from baseline

  • Improvement in objective assessment

    Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) expressed as a percentage of predicted value (FVC %): 12 months from baseline

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients with bronchiectasis using ACBT

Device: Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients with bronchiectasis using ACBT and OPEP simultaneously

Device: Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group

Interventions

Patients with bronchiectasis using ACT and OPEP simultaneously

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group

Patients will receive only ACBT for airway clearance.

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older
  • Patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis involving one or more lobes on chest computed tomography (CT)
  • Patients experiencing frequent exacerbations (3 or more exacerbations) within 1 year
  • Patients able and willing to use the Aerobika device (OPEP)

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of bronchiectasis due to cystic fibrosis
  • Traction bronchiectasis due to interstitial lung disease (ILD)
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with a history of OPEP device use
  • Patients who cannot tolerate increased breathing work
  • Hemodynamic instability (e.g., unstable blood pressure)
  • Patients with a past or current history of hemoptysis (pulmonary bleeding) and untreated pneumothorax

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chungbuk National University Hospital

Cheongju-si, North Chungcheong, 28644, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Kim SR, Kim SH, Kim GH, Cho JY, Choi H, Lee H, Ra SW, Lee KM, Choe KH, Oh YM, Shin YM, Yang B. Effectiveness of the use of an oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in bronchiectasis with frequent exacerbations: a single-arm pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 12;10:1159227. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1159227. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 37250647BACKGROUND
  • Yang B, Choi H, Lim JH, Park HY, Kang D, Cho J, Lee JS, Lee SW, Oh YM, Moon JY, Kim SH, Kim TH, Sohn JW, Yoon HJ, Lee H. The disease burden of bronchiectasis in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a national database study in Korea. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):770. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.55.

    PMID: 32042786BACKGROUND
  • Chalmers JD, Chang AB, Chotirmall SH, Dhar R, McShane PJ. Bronchiectasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Nov 15;4(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0042-3.

    PMID: 30442957BACKGROUND
  • Hill AT, Sullivan AL, Chalmers JD, De Soyza A, Elborn SJ, Floto AR, Grillo L, Gruffydd-Jones K, Harvey A, Haworth CS, Hiscocks E, Hurst JR, Johnson C, Kelleher PW, Bedi P, Payne K, Saleh H, Screaton NJ, Smith M, Tunney M, Whitters D, Wilson R, Loebinger MR. British Thoracic Society Guideline for bronchiectasis in adults. Thorax. 2019 Jan;74(Suppl 1):1-69. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212463. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30545985BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bronchiectasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Bumhee Yang, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2025

First Posted

June 25, 2025

Study Start

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Last Updated

June 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations