Benefits of Jing-Si-Herbal-Tea in Bronchiectasis
JSHT-B
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients are divided into two groups: the usual care group (UC group) and the Jing-Si Herbal Tea group (JSHT group).
- \*\*UC Group\*\*: Receives standard treatment and one placebo packet daily for three months.
- \*\*JSHT Group\*\*: Receives standard treatment plus one packet of Jing-Si Herbal Tea daily for three months. Each group includes 30 participants. The study runs from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014. Exclusions include severe liver or renal dysfunction and allergy to Jing-Si Herbal Tea. Participants must follow the study protocol. \*\*Assessments\*\*:
- \*\*HRQL\*\*: Measured using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale.
- \*\*Blood Tests\*\*: Include WBCs, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, BUN, creatinine, uric acid, liver enzymes, electrolytes, CRP, and pPro-BNP. Blood samples will also be analyzed for DAMPs and inflammatory cytokines.
- \*\*Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT)\*\*: Conducted with a spirometer per American Thoracic Society guidelines.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2025
CompletedMarch 30, 2025
March 1, 2025
1 year
September 9, 2024
March 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Health-related quality of life (HRQL)
The Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine offers the Chinese version of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) on the website. This test consists of eight items designed to evaluate COPD symptoms. These symptoms include cough, phlegm production, chest tightness, breathlessness, limitations in daily activities, confidence in leaving the house, sleep disturbances, and energy levels. Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0 to 5, culminating in a total CAT score ranging from 0 to 40. A higher score reflects more severe COPD symptoms. A score of 10 or higher is indicative of a significant symptom burden. The Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale was used to evaluate dyspnea. This scale, comprising a 5-point grading system ranging from 0 to 4, measures dyspnea severity. A score of 0 indicates dyspnea only during intense exercise, while a sore of 4 represents breathlessness at rest.
The HRQL will be assessed at baseline and after three months of intervention.
Study Arms (2)
usual care group (UC group)
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe UC group will receive standard medical treatment, with one placebo packet daily for three months.
Jing-Si Herbal Tea group (JSHT group)
EXPERIMENTALThe JSHT group will receive the standard medical treatment along with Jing-Si Herbal Tea, one packet daily for three months.
Interventions
The JSHT group will receive the standard medical treatment along with Jing-Si Herbal Tea, one packet daily for three months.
The UC group will receive standard medical treatment, with one placebo packet daily for three months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Clinically diagnosed with bronchiectasis
- Willing to participate in the study
- Signed an informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Individuals with severe liver
- Individuals with severe kidney diseases
- Individuals who refuse to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital
New Taipei City, Xindan, 23142, Taiwan
Related Publications (2)
Kao SW, Chang YC, Lin FH, Huang TL, Chen TS, Lin SZ, Lin KH, Kuo WW, Ho TJ, Huang CY. Jing-Si Herbal Tea Suppresses H2O2 -Instigated Inflammation and Apoptosis by Inhibiting Bax and Mitochondrial Cytochrome C Release in HIG-82 Synoviocytes. Environ Toxicol. 2024 Dec;39(12):5347-5356. doi: 10.1002/tox.24406. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
PMID: 39234996BACKGROUNDLin HC, Hsieh MH, Lo YL, Huang HY, Huang SW, Huang CD, Chang PJ, Lo CY, Lin TY, Fang YF, Lin SM, Lin CY, Tsai YH. IL-6 and TIMP-1 Correlated to Airway Pathogen Colonization and Predict Disease Severity in Patients with Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis. J Inflamm Res. 2024 Aug 28;17:5701-5709. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S465413. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39219819BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Division of Pulmonary Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2024
First Posted
March 30, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
March 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators have decided not to share individual participant data (IPD) due to several important considerations. Protecting participant privacy is our top priority, as sharing IPD could expose sensitive personal information and pose risks of re-identification, even if de-identified. Additionally, participants did not consent to their data being shared with other researchers, and obtaining re-consent would be challenging. Ensuring data security also requires significant resources and technical measures that our current infrastructure may not support. Furthermore, complying with complex legal and ethical regulations surrounding data sharing adds another layer of complexity. Finally, maintaining the quality and integrity of IPD before sharing demands extra effort and resources. These factors collectively influence our decision to prioritize participant protection and data security.