A Comparative Study Between Age-Based and Weight-Based Bupivacaine Dosing for Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia in Children Undergoing Elective Infra-Umbilical Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial will include 60 pediatric patients aged 1 - 6 years old, both sexes, with American society of anesthesiologists (I and II) and undergoing elective infra-umbilical surgeries with anticipated duration ≤ 90 minutes. Patients will be randomly divided into two equal groups: Weight-based dosing (Group A) and age-based dosing group (Group B). Both groups will receive hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using age based dosing of Bupivacaine compared with standard method of weight based dosing in pediatric spinal anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2025
CompletedJune 25, 2025
December 1, 2024
2 months
June 7, 2025
June 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The peak sensory level
The peak sensory level will be assessed 5 minutes after intrathecal bupivacaine injection, and evaluated by a firm skin pinch.
Assessed 5 minutes after intrathecal bupivacaine injection, and evaluated by a firm skin pinch up to 30 minutes after subarachnoid block
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Time of completion of spinal block
starts immediately at the time of application of Betadine on the site of lumbar puncture to the time at which the patient is placed on their back after immediately administering the spinal anesthesia
Duration of spinal block
starts immediately after achieving a peak sensory and motor levels and eds immediately by the onset of perioperative pain or movement of legs
Postoperative pain score
Scale will be assessed postoperatively at 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours from block administration.
The need for rescue analgesia in PACU
Postoperatively at 2 hours after spinal block and up to 1 hour postoperatively
Incidence of failure of spinal block
20 minutes after local anesthetic administration until 30 minutes after local anesthetic administration
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (10)
Systolic blood pressure (SBP)
Will be recorded at T0 (baseline values before administration of block), then upon administration of spinal anesthesia, then every 3 minutes for 15 minutes, then every 5 minutes for the duration of the surgery until the end of surgery.
Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
Will be recorded at T0 (baseline values before administration of block), then upon administration of spinal anesthesia, then every 3 minutes for 15 minutes, then every 5 minutes for the duration of the surgery until the end of surgery.
Mean blood pressure (MBP)
Will be recorded at T0 (baseline values before administration of block), then upon administration of spinal anesthesia, then every 3 minutes for 15 minutes, then every 5 minutes for the duration of the surgery until the end of surgery.
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group A: weight-based formula group
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren will receive spinal anesthesia according to the weight-based dosing calculation of Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% as following: 0.4 mg/kg (0.08 ml/kg) for children weighing 5-15 kg or 0.3 mg/kg (0.06 ml/kg) for children weighing \>15 kg
Group B: Age-based formula group
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren will receive spinal anesthesia according to the age-based dosing calculation of bupivacaine. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be calculated using Partha formula by dividing the child's age in years by 5. The resultant figure will be considered to be the dose of Bupivacaine in ml. If the number of months after the completion of a year in age is more than 6 months, the child's age will be noted to be the year older.
Interventions
Group A (n=30) will receive spinal anesthesia according to the weight-based dosing calculation of bupivacaine.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 1-6 years
- Both genders.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
- Elective infra-umbilical surgeries with anticipated duration ≤ 90 minutes.
You may not qualify if:
- Guardian refusal.
- Children with significant congenital heart disease (e.g., septal defects requiring surgical intervention)
- Children with neuromuscular disorders or high intracranial pressure.
- Children with spinal deformities or morbid obesity (body mass index (BMI) above the 99th percentile).
- Children with a history or family history of coagulation disorders.
- Children with local infection at the site of skin puncture for spinal anesthesia.
- Children with known allergy to Bupivacaine.
- Surgeries requiring Trendelenburg or prone position.
- Unexpected prolongation of surgery \> 90 minutes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Abu Elreesh Pediatric Hospital
Cairo, Assida Zainab, 12211, Egypt
Related Publications (12)
Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, Huque H, Babl FE. The Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain. J Pain. 2018 Aug;19(8):862-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
PMID: 29551662BACKGROUNDSrinivasan P, Saravanan B, Kulandayan I, Thambidurai S, Mahalakshmi V. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of age-based intrathecal dosing of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the paediatric age group. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(8):29-31.
BACKGROUNDTroncin R, Dadure C. Paediatric spinal anaesthesia. management. 2009;4(3):8-12.
BACKGROUNDElsharkawi NG. Simple pediatric analog sedation score (PASS). Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):227. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00043. No abstract available.
PMID: 9895098BACKGROUNDLuca E, Schipa C, Cambise C, Sollazzi L, Aceto P. Implication of age-related changes on anesthesia management. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Oct-Dec;17(4):474-481. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_579_23. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
PMID: 37779561BACKGROUNDHebbes CP, Thompson JP. Pharmacokinetics of anaesthetic drugs at extremes of body weight. BJA Educ. 2018 Dec;18(12):364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 33456803BACKGROUNDVisavakul O, Leurcharusmee P, Pipanmekaporn T, Khorana J, Patumanond J, Phinyo P. Effective Dose Range of Intrathecal Isobaric Bupivacaine to Achieve T5-T10 Sensory Block Heights for Elderly and Overweight Patients: An Observational Study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 1;59(3):484. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030484.
PMID: 36984485BACKGROUNDParthasarathy S, Senthilkumar T. Age-based Local Anesthetic Dosing in Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia: Evaluation of a New Formula - A Pilot Study in Indian Patients. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):627-629. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_246_16.
PMID: 28928560BACKGROUNDLonnqvist PA. Spinal anaesthesia in children: A narrative review. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun;37(2):133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
PMID: 37321762BACKGROUNDJefferson FA, Findlay BL, Handlogten KS, Gargollo PC, Warner LL, Woodbury JM, Haile DT, Granberg CF. Spinal anesthesia in infants undergoing urologic surgery duration greater than 60 minutes. J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Dec;18(6):786.e1-786.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
PMID: 35945145BACKGROUNDVerma D, Naithani U, Gokula C, Harsha. Spinal anesthesia in infants and children: A one year prospective audit. Anesth Essays Res. 2014 Sep-Dec;8(3):324-9. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143124.
PMID: 25886329BACKGROUNDHeydinger G, Tobias J, Veneziano G. Fundamentals and innovations in regional anaesthesia for infants and children. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76 Suppl 1:74-88. doi: 10.1111/anae.15283.
PMID: 33426659BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2025
First Posted
June 25, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 15, 2025
Last Updated
June 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Only IPD used in the results publications