Efficacy of Itopride Versus Metoclopramide in Hospitalized Medicine Patients With High Gastric Residual Volume
GRV
Efficacy of Enteral Itopride Versus Intravenous Metoclopramide in Hospitalized Medicine Patients With Feeding Intolerance Causing by High Gastric Residual Volume: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
86
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A prospective randomized controlled trial included 86 patients in medicine ward who were diagnosed with feeding intolerance, defined as having a gastric residual volume greater than 200 ml. The patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: one receiving enteral metoclopramide and the other receiving intravenous metoclopramide. The primary outcome was the gastric residual volume at 72 hours after treatment. The secondary outcome was gastric residual volume at 24 hours and 7 days after treatment, administered-to-prescribed volume at 72 hours after treatment, the administered-to-target energy ratio and the administered-to-target protein ratio at 96 hours after treatment, the nutrition status evaluated by the Nutrition Alert Form at 7 days after treatment, incidence of adverse events (arrhythmia, pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, aspiration), length of hospital stay, ICU length of stay and in-hospital mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
June 22, 2025
April 1, 2025
12 months
April 20, 2025
June 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean gastric residual volume (in mL) on day 3 after initiation of prokinetics
Mean gastric residual volume (in mL) on day 3 after initiation of prokinetics. The gastric residual volume was recorded four times daily, prior to feeding.
Day3
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Mean gastric residual volume (in mL) on day 1 after initiation of prokinetics
Day1
Mean gastric residual volume (in mL) on day 7 after initiation of prokinetics
Day 7
Percentage of prescribed enteral nutrition volume successfully administered on day 3 after initiation of prokinetics
Day 3
Percentage of target enteral nutrition energy successfully administered on day 4 after initiation of prokinetics
Day 4
Percentage of target enteral nutrition protein successfully administered on day 4 after initiation of prokinetics
Day 4
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Itopride
EXPERIMENTALEnteral Itopride (50 mg enterally tid ac)
Metoclopramide
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravenous Metoclopramide (10 mg IV q 6 hours) CrCl 15-60 ml/min: Metoclopramide 5 mg IV q 6 hours CrCl \<15 ml/min: Metoclopramide 5 mg IV q 12 hours Hepatic impairment/ cirrhosis: Metoclopramide 5 mg IV q 6 hours
Interventions
Intravenous Metoclopramide (10 mg IV q 6 hours) CrCl 15-60 ml/min: Metoclopramide 5 mg IV q 6 hours CrCl \<15 ml/min: Metoclopramide 5 mg IV q 12 hours Hepatic impairment/ cirrhosis: Metoclopramide 5 mg IV q 6 hours
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hospitalized medical patients aged over 18 years who were receiving enteral feeding and had a gastric residual volume (GRV) ≥ 200 ml
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any prokinetic drug within 24 hours before participating in the study
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to Metoclopramide or Itopride
- Prolonged QTc interval \> 460 ms in female \>440 ms in male
- Hemodynamic instability
- GI surgery ≤ 6 weeks before enrollment in the study
- History of esophagectomy or gastrectomy
- Pregnancy
- Suspicious or confirmed gastrointestinal obstruction or gastrointestinal hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation
- Epilepsy or currently use of anti-epileptic drug
- Acute CNS infection or severe brain injury
- Parkinson's disease
- Confirmed or suspected pheochromocytoma
- History of tardive dyskinesia, history of methemoglobinemia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Narisorn Lakananurak, MD.
Chulalongkorn University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2025
First Posted
June 22, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share