A Warning Red Flag Classification System to Predict Risk of Vasovagal Syncope During Office Hysteroscopy
FLAG-VS
A New Red Flag Classification to Predict Vasovagal Syncope During Office Hysteroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Feasibility Study
1 other identifier
observational
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot cross sectional study is to identify participants at risk of vasovagal reaction/syncope(VVR/VVS) during office hysteroscopy. A predictive red flag classification system is being studied to improve procedural safety during office hysteroscopy. Researchers will perform office hysteroscopy as per the standard protocol by vaginoscopic technique. A nurse positioned at the head side of the participant will record signs and symptoms of VVR/VVS. The participant will be asked of the severity of the pain experienced during office hysteroscopy in relation to their menstrual cycle. The procedure will be discontinued at any point the participant wishes to stop.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2025
CompletedJuly 3, 2025
July 1, 2025
4 months
May 20, 2025
July 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the feasibility of a predictive red flag classification system for identifying patients at risk of vasovagal syncope during office hysteroscopy(OH), with the goal of enhancing procedural safety.
During OH, a nurse positioned at the head of the patient will measure and record the tolerance level of the patient at the completion of the procedure using the Red flag Classification: Level Description Classification 0 Pain ≤ normal menstruation (Well tolerated) Green Flag 1. Pain \> menstruation, no signs of distress (Tolerated) Green Flag 2. Level 1 + objective signs (sweating, pallor, malaise) (Tolerated)Red Flag 3. Level 2 + facial pallor ± loss of consciousness (Not tolerated) Red Flag Normal menstruation is when the pain during periods does not interfere with daily activities. The level of pain tolerated by the women in relation to the menstruation. The feasibility will be assessed by 1) the checking the nurses records which capture the pain scores for any delays or missing data, 2 ) the number of post- procedural pain and tolerance score recorded by the nurse, 3) time taken to complete data 4)Completeness of the data. This information will be used to refine the protocol.
The tolerance level will be assessed perioperative/periprocedural, i.e from the initiation of OH procedure until the completion of the OH procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To assess the potential barriers in implementing the red flag classification system, as preparation for a future large-scale validation study
The tolerance level will be assessed perioperative/periprocedural, i.e from the initiation of OH procedure until the completion of the OH procedure.
Other Outcomes (2)
To measure visual analogue score for pain post procedure separately from the tolerance score.
The visual analogue score of pain will be assessed postoperative/postprocedural, i.e immediately after the completion of the OH procedure.
To measure the body mass index of participant undergoing office hysteroscopy
BMI is calculated when the participant is enrolled in the study to perform office hysteroscopy.
Interventions
In office hysteroscopy will utilize 1.9-2.9 mm hysteroscopes (primarily Bettocchi) by the technique of vaginoscopy, without anesthesia or up to level 3a analgesia, in accordance with International Consensus Statement for Recommended Terminology Describing Hysteroscopic Procedures. The choice of distension medium and hysteroscope is left to the operator's discretion. A nurse positioned at the head of the patient will record signs and symptoms of VVR/VVS.
Eligibility Criteria
women undergoing office hysteroscopy in the hospital / outpatient
You may qualify if:
- Women ≥18 years
- Prior gynecological care
- Informed consent provided
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to consent
- Psychiatric disorders or anxiolytic use
- Use of dilators or anesthesia above level 3a
- Family history of VVS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tanvir Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Tanvir Hospital
Hyderabad, Telangana, 500073, India
Related Publications (4)
Viechtbauer W, Smits L, Kotz D, Bude L, Spigt M, Serroyen J, Crutzen R. A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
PMID: 26146089BACKGROUNDUbeda A, Cabrera S, Escales C, Funes B, Martinez M, Puche A, Martinez Garcia S. Predictors of vasovagal symptoms or syncope during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: A prospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 May;309:121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.03.044. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
PMID: 40121697BACKGROUNDMunro MG, Kasiewicz JL, Desai VB. Office versus Institutional Operative Hysteroscopy: An Economic Model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Apr;29(4):535-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
PMID: 34933096BACKGROUNDIsaacson K. Office hysteroscopy: a valuable but under-utilized technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;14(4):381-5. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200208000-00004.
PMID: 12151827BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tanvir Dr.
Tanvir Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2025
First Posted
June 22, 2025
Study Start
June 20, 2025
Primary Completion
October 10, 2025
Study Completion
October 10, 2025
Last Updated
July 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- June 2025 -December 2025
- Access Criteria
- The individual participant data ( IPD ) will be accessible to qualified researchers doing independent scientific research after reviewing the research protocol and statistical analysis plan and execution of data sharing agreement
all individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication