NCT07030218

Brief Summary

The goal of this pilot cross sectional study is to identify participants at risk of vasovagal reaction/syncope(VVR/VVS) during office hysteroscopy. A predictive red flag classification system is being studied to improve procedural safety during office hysteroscopy. Researchers will perform office hysteroscopy as per the standard protocol by vaginoscopic technique. A nurse positioned at the head side of the participant will record signs and symptoms of VVR/VVS. The participant will be asked of the severity of the pain experienced during office hysteroscopy in relation to their menstrual cycle. The procedure will be discontinued at any point the participant wishes to stop.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 20, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 22, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 10, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 10, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

vasovagal syncopehysteroscopyred flag classification

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To evaluate the feasibility of a predictive red flag classification system for identifying patients at risk of vasovagal syncope during office hysteroscopy(OH), with the goal of enhancing procedural safety.

    During OH, a nurse positioned at the head of the patient will measure and record the tolerance level of the patient at the completion of the procedure using the Red flag Classification: Level Description Classification 0 Pain ≤ normal menstruation (Well tolerated) Green Flag 1. Pain \> menstruation, no signs of distress (Tolerated) Green Flag 2. Level 1 + objective signs (sweating, pallor, malaise) (Tolerated)Red Flag 3. Level 2 + facial pallor ± loss of consciousness (Not tolerated) Red Flag Normal menstruation is when the pain during periods does not interfere with daily activities. The level of pain tolerated by the women in relation to the menstruation. The feasibility will be assessed by 1) the checking the nurses records which capture the pain scores for any delays or missing data, 2 ) the number of post- procedural pain and tolerance score recorded by the nurse, 3) time taken to complete data 4)Completeness of the data. This information will be used to refine the protocol.

    The tolerance level will be assessed perioperative/periprocedural, i.e from the initiation of OH procedure until the completion of the OH procedure.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • To assess the potential barriers in implementing the red flag classification system, as preparation for a future large-scale validation study

    The tolerance level will be assessed perioperative/periprocedural, i.e from the initiation of OH procedure until the completion of the OH procedure.

Other Outcomes (2)

  • To measure visual analogue score for pain post procedure separately from the tolerance score.

    The visual analogue score of pain will be assessed postoperative/postprocedural, i.e immediately after the completion of the OH procedure.

  • To measure the body mass index of participant undergoing office hysteroscopy

    BMI is calculated when the participant is enrolled in the study to perform office hysteroscopy.

Interventions

In office hysteroscopy will utilize 1.9-2.9 mm hysteroscopes (primarily Bettocchi) by the technique of vaginoscopy, without anesthesia or up to level 3a analgesia, in accordance with International Consensus Statement for Recommended Terminology Describing Hysteroscopic Procedures. The choice of distension medium and hysteroscope is left to the operator's discretion. A nurse positioned at the head of the patient will record signs and symptoms of VVR/VVS.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

women undergoing office hysteroscopy in the hospital / outpatient

You may qualify if:

  • Women ≥18 years
  • Prior gynecological care
  • Informed consent provided

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to consent
  • Psychiatric disorders or anxiolytic use
  • Use of dilators or anesthesia above level 3a
  • Family history of VVS

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tanvir Hospital

Hyderabad, Telangana, 500073, India

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Viechtbauer W, Smits L, Kotz D, Bude L, Spigt M, Serroyen J, Crutzen R. A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

    PMID: 26146089BACKGROUND
  • Ubeda A, Cabrera S, Escales C, Funes B, Martinez M, Puche A, Martinez Garcia S. Predictors of vasovagal symptoms or syncope during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: A prospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 May;309:121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.03.044. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

    PMID: 40121697BACKGROUND
  • Munro MG, Kasiewicz JL, Desai VB. Office versus Institutional Operative Hysteroscopy: An Economic Model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Apr;29(4):535-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 18.

    PMID: 34933096BACKGROUND
  • Isaacson K. Office hysteroscopy: a valuable but under-utilized technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;14(4):381-5. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200208000-00004.

    PMID: 12151827BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Syncope, Vasovagal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Orthostatic IntolerancePrimary DysautonomiasAutonomic Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesSyncopeUnconsciousnessConsciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Tanvir Dr.

    Tanvir Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2025

First Posted

June 22, 2025

Study Start

June 20, 2025

Primary Completion

October 10, 2025

Study Completion

October 10, 2025

Last Updated

July 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
June 2025 -December 2025
Access Criteria
The individual participant data ( IPD ) will be accessible to qualified researchers doing independent scientific research after reviewing the research protocol and statistical analysis plan and execution of data sharing agreement

Locations