NCT07029919

Brief Summary

Two arm study, intervention and control, to explore the impact of an app to help high risk teens with asthma improve their sleep

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2025

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 9, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2026

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

TeensAdolescentsSleepAsthmaHabitsSupport for high risk teens

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Knowledge Pretest Score

    Investigators will ask participants 8 multiple choice knowledge questions related to sleep health and habits which investigators will average to create a composite knowledge score for each participant ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct while a score of 100 means a participant got all questions correct. Investigators will average these composite scores across all participants for both groups to create mean scores ranging from 0 to 100, the higher the score the more questions participants answer correctly.

    Baseline

  • Knowledge Posttest Score

    Investigators will ask participants 8 multiple choice knowledge questions related to sleep health and habits which investigators will average to create a composite knowledge score for each participant ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct while a score of 100 means a participant got all questions correct. Investigators will average these composite scores across all participants for both groups to create mean scores ranging from 0 to 100, the higher the score the more questions participants answer correctly.

    Posttest- 28 days

  • Cues to Action Pretest Score

    Investigators will ask participants 9 Likert-type scale questions to measure cues to action, where they rate their level of agreement with various statements. Each answer choice rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of cues to action. Investigators will average ratings from each question to create an average composite rating for each participant ranging from 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest score and 10 being the highest. Higher score means better outcome. Then, investigators will average these composite scores for each group.

    Baseline

  • Cues to Action Posttest Score

    Investigators will ask participants 9 Likert-type scale questions to measure cues to action, where they rate their level of agreement with various statements. Each answer choice rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of cues to action. Investigators will average ratings from each question to create an average composite rating for each participant ranging from 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest score and 10 being the highest. Higher score means better outcome. Then, investigators will average these composite scores for each group.

    Posttest- 28 days

  • Self-efficacy Pretest Score

    Investigators will ask participants 6 Likert-type scale questions related to perceived self-efficacy with improving sleep health. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of confidence in improving sleep health. Investigators will average ratings from each question to create an average composite rating for each participant ranging from 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest possible score and 10 being the highest score. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Then, investigators will average these composite scores for both groups.

    Baseline

  • Self-efficacy Posttest Score

    Investigators will ask participants 6 Likert-type scale questions related to perceived self-efficacy with improving sleep health. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of confidence in improving sleep health. Investigators will average ratings from each question to create an average composite rating for each participant ranging from 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest possible score and 10 being the highest score. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Then, investigators will average these composite scores for both groups

    Posttest- 28 days

  • Sleepiness/Restfulness Pretest Score

    Investigators will ask participants 5 Likert-type scale questions related to perceived sleepiness or tiredness during different situations. Each rating will range from 1 to 4, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of tiredness. Investigators will average ratings from each question to create an average composite rating for each participant ranging from 1 to 4, with 1 being the lowest possible score and 4 being the highest score. Lower scores mean better outcomes. Then, investigators will average these composite scores for both groups.

    Baseline

  • Sleepiness/Restfulness Posttest Score

    Investigators will ask participants 5 Likert-type scale questions related to perceived sleepiness or tiredness during different situations. Each rating will range from 1 to 4, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of tiredness. Investigators will average ratings from each question to create an average composite rating for each participant ranging from 1 to 4, with 1 being the lowest possible score and 4 being the highest score. Lower scores mean better outcomes. Then, investigators will average these composite scores for both groups.

    Posttest- 28 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Satisfaction at Posttest Score

    Posttest- 28 days

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Knowledge Scores from Pretest to Posttest

    Posttest- 28 days

  • Change in Cues to Action Scores from Pretest to Posttest

    Posttest- 28 days

  • Change in Self-Efficacy Scores From Pretest to Posttest

    Posttest- 28 days

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PATH-S Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Teens in the treatment group will be exposed to the educational material on the PATH-S app. They will engage with the app, log daily habits and sleep, and complete pretest and posttest assessments to measure changes in their knowledge, attitudes, intentions and self-efficacy.

Behavioral: PATH-S app

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Teens in the control group will not be exposed to the educational material on the PATH-S app. They will engage with the app, continue their usual schedules without the additional educational material, and complete pretest and posttest assessments to measure changes in their knowledge, attitudes, intentions and self-efficacy.

Interventions

PATH-S appBEHAVIORAL

PATH-S will use casual gaming and intermittent reinforcement techniques to encourage high risk teens to adopt and persist with personalized habits to improve sleep.

PATH-S Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Must be between 14 and 17 years old.
  • Have an asthma diagnosis from a healthcare provider.
  • Speak and understand English.
  • Have access to a computer and the Internet.
  • Have a smartphone and the ability to download and use an app.
  • Live in the United States.

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

KDH Research & Communication

Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Adolescent BehaviorParasomniasBehaviorHabitsAsthma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sleep Wake DisordersNervous System DiseasesMental DisordersBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Eric C. Tombly, PhD

    KDH Research & Communication

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Teens will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group, which will be exposed to educational material on the Personalized Approach To Habits - Sleep (PATH-S app), or the control group, which will not be exposed to educational material on the PATH-S app during the study period. Both groups will complete pretest and posttest assessments.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2025

First Posted

June 19, 2025

Study Start

July 9, 2025

Primary Completion

January 30, 2026

Study Completion

February 28, 2026

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations