NCT07024303

Brief Summary

The overall objective is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two common treatments for CB in children and adolescents with autism using multiple outcome measures. Our central hypothesis is that both behavioral treatment and medication will produce reductions in CB, but behavioral treatments, including behavior treatment + medication, will produce a greater reduction in CB when measured using direct observation within the contexts most associated with challenging behavior. We have four aims: Aim 1: Evaluate the concordance between indirect and direct measures of challenging behavior. We hypothesize that behavior change (% change) will be discordant between indirect and direct measurement data, regardless of treatment type, with direct measurement resulting in significantly greater change at each measurement timepoint. Aim 2: Compare the efficacy of psychotropic medication, behavior therapy, and combination therapy (medication+behavior therapy) on CB using indirect measures (ABC-I, BPI, CGI, MOSES) and direct observation (antecedent analysis). We hypothesize that all treatment modalities will reduce CB on both outcome measures at each standard timepoint, but behavioral therapy and combination therapy will produce a significantly greater reduction on direct observation of CB in the contexts most associated with challenging behavior. Aim 3: Compare the social validity of psychotropic medication, behavior therapy, and combination therapy using the Treatment Acceptability Rating Form-Revised (Reimers et al., 1992). Aim 4: Compare the social validity of measurement methods (indirect vs. direct).

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1

Timeline
20mo left

Started Jun 2025

Typical duration for early_phase_1

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress35%
Jun 2025Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2027

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

June 17, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 8, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

psychotropic medicationbehavioral therapybehavioral measurement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Irritability Subscale

    The ABC-I is a subscale of the 58-item ABC rating scale, which more broadly measures irritability, social withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity/noncompliance, and inappropriate speech (Aman et al., 1985). Items are rated on a 4-point. Likert scale from 0 to 3, with higher ratings corresponding to greater concern. Recent research has provided normative data for children with ASD, illustrating the validity of the five-factor structure and appropriate convergent and divergent validity (Kaat et al., 2014) as well as excellent internal consistency for the subscale of interest (Irritability = 0.92; Norris et al., 2019). The ABC-I consists of 15 items that measure child irritable mood and is commonly used to measure the effects of pharmacotherapy or behavioral therapy on disruptive behavior in children with autism (Bearss et al., 2015; Goel et al., 2018).

    At enrollment and monthly for 12 months.

  • Behavior Problems Inventory

    The BPI is a 52-item scale used to assess problem behavior in individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities (Rojahn et al., 2001). Specific behaviors (e.g., hits others, bites self) are scored on a 5-point frequency scale (0 = never, 4 = hourly) and a 4-point severity scale (0 = no problem, 3 = severe problem). The BPI measures three types of behavior: self-injurious behaviors, stereotyped behavior, and aggressive or destructive behavior. The BPI has been determined to demonstrate reasonable validity and reliability (e.g., Rojahn et al., 2001).

    At enrollment and monthly for 12 months.

  • Clinical Global Impressions Scale

    The CGI is a comprehensive, clinician-determined summary measure that integrates all available information, including the patient's history, psychosocial context, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of symptoms on functional ability. The CGI consists of two single-item measures: (a) the severity of psychopathology, rated on a 1 to 7 scale, and (b) the change from the initiation of treatment, also rated on a seven-point scale. This measure is delivered following a clinical evaluation. The CGI has shown strong correlations with established research drug efficacy scales. The standard CGI is widely used in FDA-regulated trials.

    At enrollment and every month for 12 months.

  • Home Situations Questionnaire

    The HSQ-PDD is a 25-item scale used to assess behavioral compliance in everyday settings. It is typically completed by parents of individuals with ASD (Chowdhury et al., 2010). The HSQ-PDD is a modified version of the original HSQ (Barkley \& Edelbrock 1987) and includes additional items identified as relevant to children with ASD (e.g., when asked to move from one activity to another; when there is an unexpected change in routine). When completing the measure, the rater must first identify whether an item is a challenge for the child and then rate the severity of the problem on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = mild, 9 = severe). The HSQ-PDD consists of two factors (Socially Inflexible, 14 items; Demand-Specific, 6 items). Internal consistency for the scale as a whole is excellent (Chowdhury et al., 2010).

    At enrollment and monthly for 12 months.

  • Monitoring of Side Effects Scale

    The MOSES will be administered monthly and at the 6-month follow up to evaluate side effects from behavior therapy, medication, or both. The MOSES is a comprehensive caregiver/self-administered rating scale of the potential adverse effects from psychotropic medications. It includes 83 possible symptoms that may affect 8 areas of bodily functioning. It integrates self-report and observational methods. The MOSES was developed based on reviews of psychotropic medications. Items are scored based on a zero (not present) to 4 (severe) scoring system.

    At enrollment and monthly for 12 months.

  • Treatment Acceptability Rating Form - Revised

    The TARF-R will be administered monthly and at the 6-month follow up. It is a measure of social validity that is often used to evaluate behavioral therapies. The TARF-R consists of 20 items that are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale: 17 items pertain to caregiver ratings of the total acceptability of the treatment, 2 items to caregiver perception of problem severity for the child, and 1 item to caregiver understanding of proposed intervention.

    Monthly for 12 months.

Study Arms (4)

Psychotropic Medication

EXPERIMENTAL

Classes of psychotropic medications used as treatment for challenging behavior include antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, quetiapine), stimulants (e.g., methylphenidate), alpha 2 agonists (e.g., clonidine), and mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants (e.g., valproate). However, other classes of psychotropics may be used to indirectly address challenging behavior (e.g., anxiolytics, antidepressants). Two medications (aripiprazole and risperidone) are FDA approved to treatment irritability for individuals with autism and challenging behavior. Psychotropic medications range in timing and dosage and their effects may be immediate (e.g., stimulants) or take as long as 6 weeks for full therapeutic effects (e.g., risperidone).

Drug: Psychotropic medication (at discretion of psychiatrist)

Behavior Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

In this study, FCT treatment will be provided weekly for approximately 60 min in duration. To facilitate communication during FCT, a word/picture card or microswitch (with recorded voice output) will be paired with any pre-existing child requests. Appropriate requests will be reinforced by the caregiver or therapist, and the occurrence of challenging behavior will be ignored (placed on extinction) or result in the caregiver/therapist providing guided compliance. An individualized FCT treatment plan will be developed based on the results of the functional analysis. For example, if the functional analysis identifies challenging behavior that functioned to escape task demands, then the FCT treatment plan will focus on teaching the child to request breaks appropriately after complying with instructions to complete a task. A typical task demand will be initiated by placing a small amount of developmentally appropriate "work" in front of the child and asking him or her to complete the task

Behavioral: Behavioral therapy

Combined Treatment (Medication+Behavior Therapy)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will receive both medication and behavior therapy using the same manipulations as the Psychotropic Medication and Behavior Therapy Arms.

Drug: Psychotropic medication (at discretion of psychiatrist)Behavioral: Behavioral therapy

No Treatment

NO INTERVENTION

Participants who chose none of the treatment arms may participate in the assessments.

Interventions

The timing and dose of medication will be determined by the prescribing provider. Most medications are delivered daily and some medications may be delivered more than once per day. Providers are expected to adhere to professional guidelines for prescribing.

Combined Treatment (Medication+Behavior Therapy)Psychotropic Medication

Functional communication training (FCT) will be delivered for 1 hour every week in-vivo or via telehealth. This timing and dosage has been shown effective in previous research. However, caregivers will be encouraged to practice the treatment procedures as often as possible on their own. Treatment will be delivered by a therapist and/or caregiver for those receiving in-vivo therapy and caregivers will deliver treatment with coaching from a therapist when using telehealth.

Behavior TherapyCombined Treatment (Medication+Behavior Therapy)

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
The adult subjects will be the caregiver/guardian of the minor subjects. The only inclusion criterion for the adult subjects is that they must be the caregiver/legal guardian of the minor subject and their home is primarily English speaking. The minor subjects will be individuals who were referred to Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at University of Iowa Healthcare for management of challenging behavior (e.g., physical aggression, self-injury, destruction, elopement, generalized refusal) and meet the following criteria: 1. Between the ages of 2 years, 0 months and 12 years, 0 months 2. Diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder 3. Diagnosed with intellectual disability at the moderate, severe, or profound range (called "profound autism"). 4. Display challenging behavior, including one or more of the following: physical aggression, self-injury, destruction, elopement, generalized refusal 5. Live in a home where English is the primary language spoken. 6. The caregiver is considering medication, behavioral therapy, or both to treat the child's challenging behavior. Subjects would be excluded if: 1. Not diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder 2. Do not have a moderate or severe/profound intellectual disability 3. Do not display challenging behavior 4. Live in a home where English is not the primary language spoken 5. Caregivers are not considering medication, behavior therapy, or both to treat challenging behavior

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Interventions

Behavior Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Child Development Disorders, PervasiveNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Central Study Contacts

Matthew O'Brien, PHD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a non-randomized (preference) parallel group design
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2025

First Posted

June 17, 2025

Study Start

June 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

June 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share