Measurement of Treatment Effects
Measuring the Effects of Medication and Behavioral Treatments for Challenging Behavior
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The overall objective is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two common treatments for CB in children and adolescents with autism using multiple outcome measures. Our central hypothesis is that both behavioral treatment and medication will produce reductions in CB, but behavioral treatments, including behavior treatment + medication, will produce a greater reduction in CB when measured using direct observation within the contexts most associated with challenging behavior. We have four aims: Aim 1: Evaluate the concordance between indirect and direct measures of challenging behavior. We hypothesize that behavior change (% change) will be discordant between indirect and direct measurement data, regardless of treatment type, with direct measurement resulting in significantly greater change at each measurement timepoint. Aim 2: Compare the efficacy of psychotropic medication, behavior therapy, and combination therapy (medication+behavior therapy) on CB using indirect measures (ABC-I, BPI, CGI, MOSES) and direct observation (antecedent analysis). We hypothesize that all treatment modalities will reduce CB on both outcome measures at each standard timepoint, but behavioral therapy and combination therapy will produce a significantly greater reduction on direct observation of CB in the contexts most associated with challenging behavior. Aim 3: Compare the social validity of psychotropic medication, behavior therapy, and combination therapy using the Treatment Acceptability Rating Form-Revised (Reimers et al., 1992). Aim 4: Compare the social validity of measurement methods (indirect vs. direct).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1
Started Jun 2025
Typical duration for early_phase_1
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
June 17, 2025
June 1, 2025
2 years
June 8, 2025
June 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Irritability Subscale
The ABC-I is a subscale of the 58-item ABC rating scale, which more broadly measures irritability, social withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity/noncompliance, and inappropriate speech (Aman et al., 1985). Items are rated on a 4-point. Likert scale from 0 to 3, with higher ratings corresponding to greater concern. Recent research has provided normative data for children with ASD, illustrating the validity of the five-factor structure and appropriate convergent and divergent validity (Kaat et al., 2014) as well as excellent internal consistency for the subscale of interest (Irritability = 0.92; Norris et al., 2019). The ABC-I consists of 15 items that measure child irritable mood and is commonly used to measure the effects of pharmacotherapy or behavioral therapy on disruptive behavior in children with autism (Bearss et al., 2015; Goel et al., 2018).
At enrollment and monthly for 12 months.
Behavior Problems Inventory
The BPI is a 52-item scale used to assess problem behavior in individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities (Rojahn et al., 2001). Specific behaviors (e.g., hits others, bites self) are scored on a 5-point frequency scale (0 = never, 4 = hourly) and a 4-point severity scale (0 = no problem, 3 = severe problem). The BPI measures three types of behavior: self-injurious behaviors, stereotyped behavior, and aggressive or destructive behavior. The BPI has been determined to demonstrate reasonable validity and reliability (e.g., Rojahn et al., 2001).
At enrollment and monthly for 12 months.
Clinical Global Impressions Scale
The CGI is a comprehensive, clinician-determined summary measure that integrates all available information, including the patient's history, psychosocial context, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of symptoms on functional ability. The CGI consists of two single-item measures: (a) the severity of psychopathology, rated on a 1 to 7 scale, and (b) the change from the initiation of treatment, also rated on a seven-point scale. This measure is delivered following a clinical evaluation. The CGI has shown strong correlations with established research drug efficacy scales. The standard CGI is widely used in FDA-regulated trials.
At enrollment and every month for 12 months.
Home Situations Questionnaire
The HSQ-PDD is a 25-item scale used to assess behavioral compliance in everyday settings. It is typically completed by parents of individuals with ASD (Chowdhury et al., 2010). The HSQ-PDD is a modified version of the original HSQ (Barkley \& Edelbrock 1987) and includes additional items identified as relevant to children with ASD (e.g., when asked to move from one activity to another; when there is an unexpected change in routine). When completing the measure, the rater must first identify whether an item is a challenge for the child and then rate the severity of the problem on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = mild, 9 = severe). The HSQ-PDD consists of two factors (Socially Inflexible, 14 items; Demand-Specific, 6 items). Internal consistency for the scale as a whole is excellent (Chowdhury et al., 2010).
At enrollment and monthly for 12 months.
Monitoring of Side Effects Scale
The MOSES will be administered monthly and at the 6-month follow up to evaluate side effects from behavior therapy, medication, or both. The MOSES is a comprehensive caregiver/self-administered rating scale of the potential adverse effects from psychotropic medications. It includes 83 possible symptoms that may affect 8 areas of bodily functioning. It integrates self-report and observational methods. The MOSES was developed based on reviews of psychotropic medications. Items are scored based on a zero (not present) to 4 (severe) scoring system.
At enrollment and monthly for 12 months.
Treatment Acceptability Rating Form - Revised
The TARF-R will be administered monthly and at the 6-month follow up. It is a measure of social validity that is often used to evaluate behavioral therapies. The TARF-R consists of 20 items that are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale: 17 items pertain to caregiver ratings of the total acceptability of the treatment, 2 items to caregiver perception of problem severity for the child, and 1 item to caregiver understanding of proposed intervention.
Monthly for 12 months.
Study Arms (4)
Psychotropic Medication
EXPERIMENTALClasses of psychotropic medications used as treatment for challenging behavior include antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, quetiapine), stimulants (e.g., methylphenidate), alpha 2 agonists (e.g., clonidine), and mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants (e.g., valproate). However, other classes of psychotropics may be used to indirectly address challenging behavior (e.g., anxiolytics, antidepressants). Two medications (aripiprazole and risperidone) are FDA approved to treatment irritability for individuals with autism and challenging behavior. Psychotropic medications range in timing and dosage and their effects may be immediate (e.g., stimulants) or take as long as 6 weeks for full therapeutic effects (e.g., risperidone).
Behavior Therapy
EXPERIMENTALIn this study, FCT treatment will be provided weekly for approximately 60 min in duration. To facilitate communication during FCT, a word/picture card or microswitch (with recorded voice output) will be paired with any pre-existing child requests. Appropriate requests will be reinforced by the caregiver or therapist, and the occurrence of challenging behavior will be ignored (placed on extinction) or result in the caregiver/therapist providing guided compliance. An individualized FCT treatment plan will be developed based on the results of the functional analysis. For example, if the functional analysis identifies challenging behavior that functioned to escape task demands, then the FCT treatment plan will focus on teaching the child to request breaks appropriately after complying with instructions to complete a task. A typical task demand will be initiated by placing a small amount of developmentally appropriate "work" in front of the child and asking him or her to complete the task
Combined Treatment (Medication+Behavior Therapy)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive both medication and behavior therapy using the same manipulations as the Psychotropic Medication and Behavior Therapy Arms.
No Treatment
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants who chose none of the treatment arms may participate in the assessments.
Interventions
The timing and dose of medication will be determined by the prescribing provider. Most medications are delivered daily and some medications may be delivered more than once per day. Providers are expected to adhere to professional guidelines for prescribing.
Functional communication training (FCT) will be delivered for 1 hour every week in-vivo or via telehealth. This timing and dosage has been shown effective in previous research. However, caregivers will be encouraged to practice the treatment procedures as often as possible on their own. Treatment will be delivered by a therapist and/or caregiver for those receiving in-vivo therapy and caregivers will deliver treatment with coaching from a therapist when using telehealth.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2025
First Posted
June 17, 2025
Study Start
June 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
June 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share