Early Versus Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
EILC
2 other identifiers
interventional
166
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares two different timing approaches for gallbladder removal surgery in patients with acute gallbladder inflammation (acute cholecystitis). When someone develops acute cholecystitis, doctors need to remove the gallbladder using a minimally invasive technique called laparoscopic surgery. However, there is ongoing debate about the best timing for this surgery. Some doctors prefer to operate early (within 3 days of diagnosis), while others prefer to wait and operate later (after 4 weeks of medical treatment). In this study, we randomly assigned 166 patients with acute cholecystitis to receive either:
- Early surgery: Laparoscopic gallbladder removal within 72 hours of diagnosis
- Delayed surgery: Laparoscopic gallbladder removal after 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon using standard techniques. We measured how long each surgery took, how many days patients stayed in the hospital, and how often the surgeon needed to switch from the minimally invasive approach to open surgery. The study found that patients who had early surgery had shorter operation times, went home from the hospital sooner, and were less likely to need open surgery compared to patients who waited 4 weeks for their operation. This research helps doctors and patients make better decisions about the timing of gallbladder surgery when someone has acute cholecystitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2025
CompletedJune 13, 2025
June 1, 2025
8 months
May 30, 2025
June 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Operative Time
Operative time measured in minutes from anesthesia induction to complete closure of the abdominal wall, recorded using a standardized stopwatch protocol.
Intraoperatively (from anesthesia induction to closure of abdominal wall, assessed once during the surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Length of Hospital Stay
Postoperatively (from end of surgery to discharge, assessed once at discharge)
Conversion to Open Surgery
Intraoperatively (assessed during the surgical procedure)
Study Arms (2)
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this arm will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours of diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Surgery will be performed using a standard four-port technique under general anesthesia by an experienced surgeon.
Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm will receive initial conservative management, including antibiotics and analgesics, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed after 4 weeks. The surgery will also follow the standard four-port technique under general anesthesia.
Interventions
A standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 72 hours of diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Surgery is done under general anesthesia by an experienced surgeon. This group receives no prolonged preoperative conservative management. Timing aligns with Tokyo Guidelines 2013 recommendation for early intervention
A standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed after 4 weeks of initial conservative management with antibiotics and analgesics. The procedure is conducted under general anesthesia by the same experienced surgeon, using the same technique as the early group. This approach represents delayed surgical management per traditional protocols.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 20 and 60 years
- Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis confirmed by history (right hypochondrial pain \<5 days), clinical examination (tenderness in right hypochondrium), and ultrasound (thickened fibrosed gallbladder wall)
- Presentation within 24 hours of symptom onset
- ASA physical status class I or II
- Provided written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with stones in the common bile duct on ultrasound
- Patients with empyema of the gallbladder on ultrasound
- Severe comorbidities (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, ASA class III or higher)
- Pregnancy
- Previous upper abdominal surgery
- Refusal to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lady Reading Hospital
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors collecting data on operative time, hospital stay, and conversion rates were blinded to group allocation. Complete blinding of participants and surgeons was not feasible due to the nature of the surgical timing intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Registrar
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2025
First Posted
June 13, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
June 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study was not designed with data sharing agreements or participant consent for secondary data use. Ethical and institutional restrictions prevent public data release.