U-CaVIT Versus Standard of Care for Prevention of Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage After Cesarean Section in High-risk Women.
UCaVIT Pilot
Uro-catheter Vacuum-induced Uterine Tamponade (U-CaVIT) Versus Standard of Care for Prevention of Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage After Cesarean Section in High-risk Women: a Monocentric Randomized-controlled Pilot Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot study aims to assess performance, safety and feasibility of U-CaVIT method (Uro-Catheter Vacuum Induced Tamponade), using the Rüsch® Brillant Silicone Balloon Catheter, an urological catheter, for the prevention of atonic PPH in high-risk women undergoing cesarean delivery. The U-CaVIT method has been implemented at the Department of Obstetrics at university hospital of Zurich (USZ) due to temporary supply issues with the Bakri® Balloon Catheter. The Rüsch® Balloon Catheter is used in case of uterine atony when standard first-line uterotonic treatments have failed or in some cases as add-on therapy in non-atonic PPH. In the meantime, the use of U-CaVIT has become standard practice at the USZ for the treatment of atonic PPH, appearing to be user-friendly, clinically effective according to treating physicians, well tolerated by the treated women and cost-saving compared to the previously used Bakri® Balloon.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
April 22, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.4 years
April 22, 2025
April 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in hemoglobin
The primary outcome is to evaluate the postpartum change in hemoglobin (g/L) after cesarean delivery, comparing patients in the intervention group (treated with standard of care (SOC) plus U-CaVIT) to patients in the control group (treated with SOC).
From baseline (shortly before cesarean delivery) and 48 hours (range 36 to 60 hours) after cesarean delivery
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Postpartum hemoglobin (g/L)
Baseline (shortly before cesarean delivery) until hospital discharge (Follow-up 2), estimated 3 - 5 days after delivery
Blood loss
24 hours after delivery
Further PPH treatment/intervention.
Hospital discharge (Follow-up 2), estimated 3 - 5 days after delivery
Surgical revision
24 hours after delivery
Uterotonic medication, of blood, blood products or coagulation factors.
24 hours after delivery
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Other outcomes: usability of U-CaVIT
Hospital discharge (Follow-up 2), estimated 3 - 5 days after delivery
Safety Outcome
Randomization and hospital discharge (Follow-up 2), estimated 3 - 5 days after delivery
Study Arms (2)
U-CaVIT
EXPERIMENTALProphylactic treatment with Rüsch® Balloon Catheter Ch. 24
Control
NO INTERVENTIONWomen in the control group will be treated according to the standard of care procedure.
Interventions
After cesarean delivery, patients in the intervention group receive the following intervention: The Rüsch® Balloon Catheter Ch. 24 will be inserted directly into the uterus before uterotomy closure. After insertion of the catheter, the catheter balloon is filled up to 80 ml of 0.9% saline solution and connected to the vacuum device whereby an intrauterine vacuum of -60 to a maximum of -70 kPa is applied once the uterotomy is closed. Once the catheter has been positioned, it is left in place for one hour as a prophylactic measure while a vacuum is applied. The device will be removed by draining the liquid in the balloon, after 1 hour of vacuum-induced tamponade. The final decision for removal of the catheter in this study is made by the senior physician responsible for the woman.
The position of the balloon catheter as well as the condition of the uterine cavity are assessed immediately postoperatively using ultrasonography.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Maternal age ≥18 years
- Gestational age ≥30+0 weeks of pregnancy at day of delivery
- Vital pregnancy
- Delivery mode: planned cesarean delivery
- High-risk patient for PPH specified by the presence of at least one of the following characteristics: Previous PPH, obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), high parity (patient who has had ≥4 previous births (live or stillborn) at ≥20 weeks of gestation), very advanced maternal age ≥45 years, multiple gestation, polyhydramnios (defined as amniotic fluid index \> 25 cm or deepest amniotic fluid pocket \> 8 cm) at admission to delivery, suspected fetal macrosomia (estimated fetal weight ≥ 4500g)
You may not qualify if:
- Insufficient language skills in German or English to understand and sign informed consent
- Participation in another interventional study
- Emergency cesarean section (incl. patients undergoing cesarean after failed vaginal delivery)
- Subjects who change their delivery plan from vaginal to cesarean section in the course of hospitalization
- Women with regular and painful contractions and women who do not have time for sufficient consideration
- Clinical situations in which vacuum-induced uterine tamponade is unlikely to be effective or is contraindicated:
- Uterine or vaginal anomalies (genital tract congenital anomalies)
- Cesarean section due to placenta previa or suspected placenta accreta spectrum
- Suspected uterine rupture
- Injuries of the cervix or vagina
- Submucous or intramural uterine fibroids which are buldging into the uterine cavity
- Deep endometriosis \[16, 17\]
- Planned atony-prophylaxis with oxytocin due to contraindication for carbetocin
- Previous MMC-repair (myelomeningocele-repair)
- Clinical diagnosis of chorioamnionitis, sepsis
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Christian Haslingerlead
- University of Zurichcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Related Publications (5)
Goffman D, Rood KM, Bianco A, Biggio JR, Dietz P, Drake K, Heilman E, Hopkins M, De Four Jones M, Katz T, Martin C, Prasad M, Smid MC, Wine KD, Ryan R, Yong C, Carney PI, Simhan HN. Real-World Utilization of an Intrauterine, Vacuum-Induced, Hemorrhage-Control Device. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov 1;142(5):1006-1016. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005366. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
PMID: 37713322BACKGROUNDD'Alton ME, Rood KM, Smid MC, Simhan HN, Skupski DW, Subramaniam A, Gibson KS, Rosen T, Clark SM, Dudley D, Iqbal SN, Paglia MJ, Duzyj CM, Chien EK, Gibbins KJ, Wine KD, Bentum NAA, Kominiarek MA, Tuuli MG, Goffman D. Intrauterine Vacuum-Induced Hemorrhage-Control Device for Rapid Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):882-891. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004138.
PMID: 32909970BACKGROUNDPurwosunu Y, Sarkoen W, Arulkumaran S, Segnitz J. Control of Postpartum Hemorrhage Using Vacuum-Induced Uterine Tamponade. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;128(1):33-36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001473.
PMID: 27275795BACKGROUNDHaslinger C, Weber K, Zimmermann R. Vacuum-Induced Tamponade for Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;138(3):361-365. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004510.
PMID: 34352848BACKGROUNDSay L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller AB, Daniels J, Gulmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, Alkema L. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. Epub 2014 May 5.
PMID: 25103301BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Prof. Dr. med. Christian Haslinger, MD
University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The analysis of the primary outcome will be performed using blinded treatment arms.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. med.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2025
First Posted
June 13, 2025
Study Start
May 28, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- At the time of publication
- Access Criteria
- Access will be provided without limitations. Data will be provided to allow independent computational reproducibility of already published results.
The data sharing plan aims to ensure computational reproducibility of all published research findings obtained from data collected in this trial. Each publication will be accompanied by a dedicated compendium containing deidentified individual patient data necessary to independently reproduce the analyses presented in the corresponding publication. Such a compendium also contains information about the computer code that was used to generate figures, tables, and other statistical output. Distribution will be via a data repository following FAIR principles (such as zenodo.org).