NCT03520374

Brief Summary

Perioperative aspiration of gastric contents is a rare but serious adverse event. The risk of aspiration can be estimated by perioperative evaluation of stomach contents with ultrasound using a validated technique and scoring system. A lack of knowledge or familiarity is frequently cited by anesthesia providers as a rationale for not performing perioperative ultrasound assessments. The purpose of this study is to determine whether novice ultrasonography users (medical students, undergraduates, or inexperienced anesthesiologists) can be effectively taught a technique to evaluate stomach contents as compared to experts in ultrasonography.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 27, 2018

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 9, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 2, 2018

Completed
7.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 1, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

April 27, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ultrasoundgastric contents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Novice vs Expert Ultrasonographers Gastric Evaluation

    The gastric evaluation of novice and expert ultrasonographers will be compared based on a 3-point numerical evaluation.

    Novice ultrasonographers: for pediatric patients - after anesthesia induction and before the procedure start, for healthy volunteers - hours following signing the consent form. Expert ultrasonographers: weeks following the initial evaluation by novices.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time elapsed to reach gastric evaluation

    Novice ultrasonographers: for pediatric patients - after anesthesia induction and before the procedure start, for healthy volunteers - hours following signing the consent form. Expert ultrasonographers: weeks following the initial evaluation by novices.

Study Arms (2)

Healthy adult volunteers

OTHER

Novice ultrasonographers will be taught to assess gastric contents with a short and simple educational program. Each novice will assess the gastric contents of 3 healthy adult volunteers using the clinical algorithm for gastric ultrasound and aspiration risk assessment - giving an antral grade for each subject (a score of 0-2). Each novice ultrasound assessment will be video recorded. In the weeks following this evaluation, expert ultrasonographers will observe each video and give their own scores for each subject using the antral grading system.

Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonography

Pediatric patients

OTHER

Novice ultrasonographers will be taught to assess gastric contents with a short and simple educational program. Each novice will assess the gastric contents of 3 pediatric patients undergoing surgery in the preoperative area or the in-patient unit using the clinical algorithm for gastric ultrasound and aspiration risk assessment - giving an antral grade for each subject (a score of 0-2). Each novice ultrasound assessment will be video recorded. In the weeks following this evaluation, expert ultrasonographers will observe each video and give their own scores for each subject using the antral grading system.

Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonography

Interventions

UltrasonographyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Ultrasonography use for the evaluation of gastric contents

Healthy adult volunteersPediatric patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients must:
  • be between ages of 2-60 years of age
  • have parental consent for children 2-17 years of age, or if the participant is 18 years or older, the participant must sign the ICF for them self as an adult
  • undergoing interventional radiology procedures under general anesthesia or located at an inpatient/outpatient facility at LPCH if they are a pediatric patient
  • must be over 18 years of age if a healthy volunteer

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing emergent surgical procedures
  • BMI greater than 24

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

LPCH/SHC

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Arzola C, Perlas A, Siddiqui NT, Downey K, Ye XY, Carvalho JCA. Gastric ultrasound in the third trimester of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial to develop a predictive model of volume assessment. Anaesthesia. 2018 Mar;73(3):295-303. doi: 10.1111/anae.14131. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

  • Spencer AO, Walker AM, Lardner DR, Perlas A. Reply to Schmitz et al. regarding 'Ultrasound assessment of gastric volume in the fasted pediatric patient undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: development of a predictive model using endoscopically suctioned volumes'. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Jun;26(6):672-3. doi: 10.1111/pan.12915. No abstract available.

  • Kruisselbrink R, Arzola C, Endersby R, Tse C, Chan V, Perlas A. Intra- and interrater reliability of ultrasound assessment of gastric volume. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jul;121(1):46-51. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000193.

  • Khurana J, Gartner SC, Naik L, Tsui BCH. Ultrasound Identification of Diaphragm by Novices Using ABCDE Technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):161-165. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000718.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Ultrasonography

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • Ban CH Tsui, MD

    Stanford University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Ban CH Tsui, MD

CONTACT

Ksenia Kasimova, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2018

First Posted

May 9, 2018

Study Start

August 2, 2018

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

May 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

All data will be de-identified. Data will be used collectively for research analysis.

Locations