Wear Resistance Of Bioactive With And Without Etching Vs. Conventional Resin-Based Fissure Sealants
Clinical And Digital Evaluation Of Wear Resistance Of Bioactive Pits And Fissure Sealant With And Without Etching Versus Conventional Resin Based Pits And Fissure Sealants: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
1 other identifier
interventional
23
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the wear resistance and clinical performance of bioactive versus conventional resin-based pit and fissure sealants over a 12-month period. Conducted on young adults with sound, caries-susceptible molars, the study evaluated three groups: bioactive sealants applied with and without etching, and conventional resin-based sealants with etching. Clinical assessments and 3D digital scans were used to measure sealant retention and wear. The study seeks to determine whether bioactive sealants, especially when applied without etching, provide comparable long-term protection and durability to conventional sealants, potentially simplifying application without compromising effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
ExpectedJune 12, 2025
June 1, 2025
1 month
May 21, 2025
June 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
retention of wear resistance of the sealants
modified USPHS criteria
3,6,9 and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
quantitative wear assesment
12 months
Study Arms (3)
Fluoride Releasing bioactive Pit and Fissure Sealant with etchant
EXPERIMENTALFluoride Releasing bioactive Pit and Fissure Sealant with etchant application.
Fluoride Releasing bioactive Pit and Fissure Sealant without etchant
EXPERIMENTALFluoride Releasing bioactive Pit and Fissure Sealant without etchant application.
conventional resin based pits and fissure sealant
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional resin-based sealant with etchant application
Interventions
This group received BeautiSealant (a bioactive giomer-based sealant) applied after etching the enamel surface with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. The etching process creates micro-retentive patterns in the enamel to enhance micromechanical bonding, potentially improving the sealant's retention and wear resistance while also benefiting from the bioactive material's fluoride release and enamel remineralization properties.
In this group, BeautiSealant was applied directly to the tooth surface without prior etching. The goal was to simplify the procedure by eliminating the etching step, relying instead on the sealant's chemical bonding and bioactive properties (such as fluoride release and S-PRG technology) to maintain retention and resist wear, while reducing the risk of enamel alteration and improving clinical efficiency.
This group served as the control and received Fisseal (a conventional resin-based sealant) applied following standard etching with 37% phosphoric acid. This method is considered the gold standard for fissure sealing, offering strong micromechanical adhesion and proven wear resistance, making it a reliable benchmark for evaluating the performance of newer bioactive materials.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged between 18-25 years old with caries susceptible sound fissures and good oral hygiene
- They should not show any signs of caries by visual tactile examination method and VistaProof fluoroscent camera
- Teeth should have intact contact with opposing teeth, no previous restorations in other surfaces, no previous sealing procedures and scoring 0.9 or less when tested and VistaProof.
- Medically free patients.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with poor oral hygiene, lack of compliance, parafunctional habits, tempro-mandibular joint disorders, periodontal disease, severe medical conditions, allergic history concerning methacrylates, rampant caries, heavy smoking and xerostomia.
- Teeth with caries pits and fissures, developmental anomalies, periapical pathology or signs of pulpal pathology, hypersensitivity, possible prosthodontic restoration, heavy occlusion and occlusal contacts, history of bruxism, severe periodontal affection and scoring \>0.9 when tested with VistaProof
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Master degree student dentist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2025
First Posted
June 12, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06