Ciprofloxacin vs Ceftazidime for Empirical Treatment of High-Risk Neutropenic Fever in Children With Hematologic Malignancies
Ciprofloxacin Versus Ceftazidime as Empirical Therapy of High-Risk Neutropenic Fever in Children With Hematologic Malignancies : A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial will compare use of ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime work in treating high-risk fever in children with hematological malignancies
- Collecting patient history, conducting physical exams, and performing supporting tests.
- Randomly assigning participants into two groups: one group will receive the standard treatment with intravenous ciprofloxacin, while the other group will receive the intervention treatment with intravenous ceftazidime.
- Both groups will be monitored for various outcomes, including the length of fever, length of low white blood cell count, length of hospital stay, length of antibiotic use, any changes in antibiotics, and mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedAugust 22, 2025
June 1, 2025
6 months
May 30, 2025
August 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Duration of fever
Duration of fever since receiving the first antibiotic, based on the temperature graph available in the electronic medical record
from first administration of Ciprofloxacin or Ceftazidime to 48 hours fever free
Duration of Neutropenia
The length of time the subject experiences neutropenia, absolute neutrophil count is \<500
From first antibiotic administration to 48 hours after administration
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Duration of hospitalization
From first administration of Ciprofloxacin or Ceftazidime to hospital discharge
Duration of antibiotic use
days from first administration to the last intravenous antibiotic administration
Antibiotic escalation decisions
From first administration of Ciprofloxacin or Ceftazidime to 48 hours after administration
Mortality
from first administration of ciprofloxacin or ceftazidime to 30 days after recruitment
Study Arms (2)
Group A
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard therapy IV ciprofloxacin 10 mg/kgBW/12 hours
Group B
EXPERIMENTALIV ceftazidime 150 mg/kgBW/24 hours divided into 3 doses
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 0 to 18 years with hematological malignancies.
- Children with high-risk neutropenic fever, namely children with blood malignancies induction phase ALL, consolidation phase ALL, reinduction phase ALL, relapse ALL; meningeal ALL, AML, and NHL, diagnosed by a competent pediatrician on duty.
- Consent from parents to be included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with malignancies but accompanied by comorbidities (HIV infection, septic shock).
- Allergy to ciproloxacin or ceftazidime.
- Fever associated with blood transfusion reactions.
- Receiving other antibiotics since 72 hours before being included in the study, except for cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and ciproloxacin prophylaxis in AML.
- Children with blood malignancies who have impaired renal function (serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 times the upper normal limit) and impaired liver function (SGPT \> 5 times the upper normal limit).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
RSUP dr Sardjito
Sleman, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Related Publications (3)
Corapcioglu F, Sarper N. Cefepime versus ceftazidime + amikacin as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in children with cancer: a prospective randomized trial of the treatment efficacy and cost. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005 Jan-Feb;22(1):59-70. doi: 10.1080/08880010590896297.
PMID: 15770833BACKGROUNDKamonrattana R, Sathitsamitphong L, Choeyprasert W, Charoenkwan P, Natesirinilkul R, Fanhchaksai K. A Randomized, Open-Labeled, Prospective Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of Frontline Empirical Intravenous Piperacillin/Tazobactam Monotherapy in Comparison with Ceftazidime Plus Amikacin for Febrile Neutropenia in Pediatric Oncology Patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):2733-2737. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.9.2733.
PMID: 31554370BACKGROUNDYasuda T, Suzuki R, Ishikawa Y, Terakura S, Inamoto Y, Yanada M, Nagai H, Ozawa Y, Ozeki K, Atsuta Y, Emi N, Naoe T. Randomized controlled trial comparing ciprofloxacin and cefepime in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. Int J Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;17(6):e385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
PMID: 23317527BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Head of Pediatric Hematolo-Oncology Divison
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2025
First Posted
June 11, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
August 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06