Super-Pulsed Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:YAG Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Ureteral and Renal Stones
An Application of Super-pulsed TFL vs Ho:YAG Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Ureter and Renal Stones: A Multi-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
448
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The holmium laser is currently considered the gold standard for lithotripsy on urinary lithiasis, whereas the super-pulsed thulium fibre laser is a relatively new technology. Through a multi-center prospective randomised clinical study that mainly aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of a super-pulsed fibre thulium laser compared to a holmium laser in the treatment of upper ureteral and renal stones (10mm\<cumulative maximum diameter ≤ 25mm) in retrograde intrarenal surgery. The research participants are assigned randomly to undergo retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) either using a super-pulsed thulium fibre laser or a holmium-YAG laser with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The secondary aim of this study is to provide high-level evidence for the development of diagnostic and treatment guidelines in the field of urolithiasis, both domestically and internationally. The outcomes of the RIRS procedures are compared for the two treatment arms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 20, 2027
June 10, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.7 years
May 20, 2025
June 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Stone-Free Rate at 4 Weeks Postoperative (Percentage of Participants)
Urinary tract CT(Computed Tomography)scan at 4 weeks post-operative did not reveal residual stones or residual stones with a diameter ≤ 2 mm and no clinical symptoms were defined as stone clearance
4 week post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Intraoperative complication rate (Percentage of Participants)
During the procedure
Change in Hemoglobin from Baseline (g/dL)
Within 24 hours postoperative
Change in Serum Creatinine from Baseline (μmol/L)
Within 24 hours postoperative
Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen from Baseline (mmol/L)
Within 24 hours postoperative
Operative time (Minutes)
Decided immediately after the surgery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Superpulse Thulium Fiber laser (SPTFL)
ACTIVE COMPARATORWith the help of a Superpuled Thulium Fibre laser machine, the ureteral or renal stones that are going to be treated with the RIRS procedure are either fragmented or dusted as part of the procedure.
Holmium: YAG laser
ACTIVE COMPARATORWith the help of a Holmium fibre laser machine, the ureteral or renal stones that are going to be treated with the RIRS procedure are either fragmented or dusted as part of the procedure.
Interventions
RIRS procedure for upper ureteral or renal stone lithotripsy with Superpulsed Thulium Laser
RIRS procedure for upper ureteral or renal stone lithotripsy with Holmium: YAG Laser
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≤ Age ≤ 75 years old, regardless of gender, able to tolerate surgery;
- Patients who have been confirmed by bilateral renal/urinary tract CT to have upper ureteral or renal stones, single or multiple, and are planning to undergo ureteroscopic lithotripsy for stone removal;
- Confirmed by bilateral renal/urinary tract CT, the cumulative maximum diameter of stones is 10mm\<cumulative maximum diameter ≤ 25mm;
- Those who voluntarily participate and sign an informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Uncontrollable systemic hemorrhagic disease;
- Severe spinal deformities, severe hip joint deformities, and difficulty in lithotomy position;
- Uncontrolled urinary tract infections;
- Any intracavitary surgery caused by anatomical factors of the urinary system cannot be performed;
- Pregnant, planned pregnancy within 3 months, and lactating female patients;
- The patients determined by the investigator to be unsuitable for this study include (but are not limited to): known to have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or AIDS; Suffering from mental illness; Infectious diseases;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen Universitylead
- RenJi Hospitalcollaborator
- Tongji Hospitalcollaborator
- West China Hospitalcollaborator
- Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicinecollaborator
- Renmin Hospital of Wuhan Universitycollaborator
- Beijing Friendship Hospitalcollaborator
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical Universitycollaborator
- Beijing Tsinghua Changgeng Hospitalcollaborator
- People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Regioncollaborator
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospitalcollaborator
- Shenzhen People's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sun Yat sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China
Related Publications (13)
Wang W, Fan J, Huang G, Li J, Zhu X, Tian Y, Su L. Prevalence of kidney stones in mainland China: A systematic review. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 31;7:41630. doi: 10.1038/srep41630.
PMID: 28139722BACKGROUNDKhan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, Traxer O, Tiselius HG. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Feb 25;2:16008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.8.
PMID: 27188687BACKGROUNDFried NM, Irby PB. Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Sep;15(9):563-573. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0035-8.
PMID: 29884804BACKGROUNDTeichmann HO, Herrmann TR, Bach T. Technical aspects of lasers in urology. World J Urol. 2007 Jun;25(3):221-5. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0184-5. Epub 2007 May 30.
PMID: 17534625BACKGROUNDEmiliani E, Kanashiro A, Angerri O. Lasers for stone lithotripsy: advantages/disadvantages of each laser source. Curr Opin Urol. 2023 Jul 1;33(4):302-307. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001092. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
PMID: 36927702BACKGROUNDTraxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1883-1894. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
PMID: 30729311BACKGROUNDHale GM, Querry MR. Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. Appl Opt. 1973 Mar 1;12(3):555-63. doi: 10.1364/AO.12.000555.
PMID: 20125343BACKGROUNDVentimiglia E, Doizi S, Kovalenko A, Andreeva V, Traxer O. Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers. BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):159-167. doi: 10.1111/bju.15079. Epub 2020 May 18.
PMID: 32277557BACKGROUNDSolano C, Corrales M, Panthier F, Candela L, Doizi S, Traxer O. Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios. World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2627-2636. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04487-9. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
PMID: 37468656BACKGROUNDDorantes-Carrillo LA, Basulto-Martinez M, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Heinze A, Proietti S, Flores-Tapia JP, Esqueda-Mendoza A, Giusti G. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jan;8(1):259-270. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
PMID: 33627307BACKGROUNDJiao B, Luo Z, Xu X, Zhang M, Zhang G. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of upper urinary stones - A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
PMID: 31521837BACKGROUNDLi Z, Lai C, Shah AK, Xie W, Liu C, Huang L, Li K, Yu H, Xu K. Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm). BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 16;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00586-6.
PMID: 32178654BACKGROUNDMartov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseynov M, Andronov AS, Plekhanova OA. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):795-800. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0581. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
PMID: 33238763RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kewei Xu, MD, PhD
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Prior to the surgery, it is necessary to select the surgical technique and follow the trial protocol by opening an envelope in the specified sequence. This trial protocol follows a "single blind" format, meaning that the researcher is aware of the surgical method while the subject remains unaware.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Kewei Xu, MD, Ph.D
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2025
First Posted
June 10, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 20, 2027
Last Updated
June 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share