NCT07012941

Brief Summary

The holmium laser is currently considered the gold standard for lithotripsy on urinary lithiasis, whereas the super-pulsed thulium fibre laser is a relatively new technology. Through a multi-center prospective randomised clinical study that mainly aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of a super-pulsed fibre thulium laser compared to a holmium laser in the treatment of upper ureteral and renal stones (10mm\<cumulative maximum diameter ≤ 25mm) in retrograde intrarenal surgery. The research participants are assigned randomly to undergo retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) either using a super-pulsed thulium fibre laser or a holmium-YAG laser with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The secondary aim of this study is to provide high-level evidence for the development of diagnostic and treatment guidelines in the field of urolithiasis, both domestically and internationally. The outcomes of the RIRS procedures are compared for the two treatment arms.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
448

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
11mo left

Started Jul 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress50%
Jul 2025Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2025

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 10, 2025

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2025

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2027

Expected
20 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 20, 2027

Last Updated

June 10, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

May 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTFL)Ho:YAG laserLithotripsyUreteral StoneUreteroscopyrenal stone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Stone-Free Rate at 4 Weeks Postoperative (Percentage of Participants)

    Urinary tract CT(Computed Tomography)scan at 4 weeks post-operative did not reveal residual stones or residual stones with a diameter ≤ 2 mm and no clinical symptoms were defined as stone clearance

    4 week post-operative

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Intraoperative complication rate (Percentage of Participants)

    During the procedure

  • Change in Hemoglobin from Baseline (g/dL)

    Within 24 hours postoperative

  • Change in Serum Creatinine from Baseline (μmol/L)

    Within 24 hours postoperative

  • Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen from Baseline (mmol/L)

    Within 24 hours postoperative

  • Operative time (Minutes)

    Decided immediately after the surgery

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Superpulse Thulium Fiber laser (SPTFL)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

With the help of a Superpuled Thulium Fibre laser machine, the ureteral or renal stones that are going to be treated with the RIRS procedure are either fragmented or dusted as part of the procedure.

Device: Superpulse Thulium Fiber laser (SPTFL) ureteroscopy for treatment of upper urinary tract stone or renal stone

Holmium: YAG laser

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

With the help of a Holmium fibre laser machine, the ureteral or renal stones that are going to be treated with the RIRS procedure are either fragmented or dusted as part of the procedure.

Device: Holmium: YAG laser ureteroscopy for treatment of upper urinary tract stone or renal stone

Interventions

RIRS procedure for upper ureteral or renal stone lithotripsy with Superpulsed Thulium Laser

Superpulse Thulium Fiber laser (SPTFL)

RIRS procedure for upper ureteral or renal stone lithotripsy with Holmium: YAG Laser

Holmium: YAG laser

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≤ Age ≤ 75 years old, regardless of gender, able to tolerate surgery;
  • Patients who have been confirmed by bilateral renal/urinary tract CT to have upper ureteral or renal stones, single or multiple, and are planning to undergo ureteroscopic lithotripsy for stone removal;
  • Confirmed by bilateral renal/urinary tract CT, the cumulative maximum diameter of stones is 10mm\<cumulative maximum diameter ≤ 25mm;
  • Those who voluntarily participate and sign an informed consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncontrollable systemic hemorrhagic disease;
  • Severe spinal deformities, severe hip joint deformities, and difficulty in lithotomy position;
  • Uncontrolled urinary tract infections;
  • Any intracavitary surgery caused by anatomical factors of the urinary system cannot be performed;
  • Pregnant, planned pregnancy within 3 months, and lactating female patients;
  • The patients determined by the investigator to be unsuitable for this study include (but are not limited to): known to have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or AIDS; Suffering from mental illness; Infectious diseases;

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sun Yat sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Wang W, Fan J, Huang G, Li J, Zhu X, Tian Y, Su L. Prevalence of kidney stones in mainland China: A systematic review. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 31;7:41630. doi: 10.1038/srep41630.

    PMID: 28139722BACKGROUND
  • Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, Traxer O, Tiselius HG. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Feb 25;2:16008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.8.

    PMID: 27188687BACKGROUND
  • Fried NM, Irby PB. Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Sep;15(9):563-573. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0035-8.

    PMID: 29884804BACKGROUND
  • Teichmann HO, Herrmann TR, Bach T. Technical aspects of lasers in urology. World J Urol. 2007 Jun;25(3):221-5. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0184-5. Epub 2007 May 30.

    PMID: 17534625BACKGROUND
  • Emiliani E, Kanashiro A, Angerri O. Lasers for stone lithotripsy: advantages/disadvantages of each laser source. Curr Opin Urol. 2023 Jul 1;33(4):302-307. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001092. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

    PMID: 36927702BACKGROUND
  • Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1883-1894. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

    PMID: 30729311BACKGROUND
  • Hale GM, Querry MR. Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. Appl Opt. 1973 Mar 1;12(3):555-63. doi: 10.1364/AO.12.000555.

    PMID: 20125343BACKGROUND
  • Ventimiglia E, Doizi S, Kovalenko A, Andreeva V, Traxer O. Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers. BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):159-167. doi: 10.1111/bju.15079. Epub 2020 May 18.

    PMID: 32277557BACKGROUND
  • Solano C, Corrales M, Panthier F, Candela L, Doizi S, Traxer O. Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios. World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2627-2636. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04487-9. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

    PMID: 37468656BACKGROUND
  • Dorantes-Carrillo LA, Basulto-Martinez M, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Heinze A, Proietti S, Flores-Tapia JP, Esqueda-Mendoza A, Giusti G. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jan;8(1):259-270. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

    PMID: 33627307BACKGROUND
  • Jiao B, Luo Z, Xu X, Zhang M, Zhang G. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of upper urinary stones - A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

    PMID: 31521837BACKGROUND
  • Li Z, Lai C, Shah AK, Xie W, Liu C, Huang L, Li K, Yu H, Xu K. Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm). BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 16;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00586-6.

    PMID: 32178654BACKGROUND
  • Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseynov M, Andronov AS, Plekhanova OA. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):795-800. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0581. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

UreterolithiasisKidney CalculiNephrolithiasis

Interventions

Ureteroscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ureteral DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrolithiasisMale Urogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrinary CalculiCalculiPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiagnostic Techniques, UrologicalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrogenital Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Kewei Xu, MD, PhD

    Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Prior to the surgery, it is necessary to select the surgical technique and follow the trial protocol by opening an envelope in the specified sequence. This trial protocol follows a "single blind" format, meaning that the researcher is aware of the surgical method while the subject remains unaware.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Arm 1: Superpulse Thulium Fiber laser Arm 2: Holmium:YAG laser
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Kewei Xu, MD, Ph.D

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2025

First Posted

June 10, 2025

Study Start

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 20, 2027

Last Updated

June 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations