NCT07012408

Brief Summary

Introduction "Return-to-play" (RTP) is an English term that corresponds to "return to competition". It is important to understand that this return is a constant, dynamic, and personalized decision-making process . The main objective of RTP is not to predict the exact moment of an athlete's return; rather, it is to prevent new injuries. For this, adequate decision-making is necessary. There are several important steps in the process, including correct diagnosis, strict control of workloads, and intelligent management of modifiers intrinsic to the sport that can lead to anxiety and stress How are the pieces of the RTP puzzle arranged and managed? How are RTP processes evaluated today? How should RTP be understood? Should it be understood statically, as a checklist, or as a constant decision-making process involving the player? Main objective: Evaluate the design of the RTP process for muscle injuries in sports. Specific objectives:

  • To compare two RTP designs and evaluate how their design influences the anxiety experienced by the player.
  • Identify variables that may be altered when choosing a regressive or progressive RTP design, such as sleep quality and cortisol level.
  • To establish direction in the design of the RTP process.
  • Create complete clinical guidelines on muscle injuries in sports with a focus on RTP design. Material and Methods Definition of the Study Subjects The subjects of the study will be all players belonging to the first or B team who suffer a muscle injury diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. At the time of injury, they will be randomly assigned to either the control group (following a regressive RTP design) or the intervention group (following a progressive RTP design). Masking will be double-blind. The sample size will be N=74. The secondary variables will be recorded in the database after diagnosis by MRI. Subsequently, the primary variables will be measured and recorded at the beginning, middle, and end of the RTP period. It is estimated that approximately half of the necessary sample size has been reached: about 37 subjects with muscle injury. The first statistical analysis will then be carried out to observe the preliminary results. After three years, once the analysis has been completed, the results and conclusions will be written up for publication in a journal.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
29mo left

Started Sep 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress23%
Sep 2025Sep 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 31, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 10, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 3, 2027

Expected
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

June 18, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 31, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Return to playDesigneffects

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Anxiety

    Player Anxiety During the Return-to-Play Process. GAD-7 Anxiety scale. This is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 to the response categories, respectively,of "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day." GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21. 0-4: minimal anxiety 5-9: mild anxiety 10-14: moderate anxiety 15-21: severe anxiety

    It will be measured at the beginning, middle, and end of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

  • Sleep quality

    The quality of the player's sleep during the Return to Play process. This is measured with the Oura Ring, which uses a validated scale to quantify sleep quality. Oura's Sleep Score. 85-100: Optimal sleep quality. 70-84: Good sleep quality. 60-69: Fair sleep quality. 0-59: Areas for improvement are needed.

    It will be measured at the beginning, middle, and end of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

  • Stress (cortisol)

    Stress (cortisol) during the return-to-play process. We will measure it with the ELISA salivary kit to see how this hormone, which is directly related to the stress experienced by the athlete, varies. Cortisol levels are typically measured in micrograms per deciliter (mcg/dL) and fluctuate throughout the day, with the highest levels in the morning and the lowest at night. Normal ranges vary depending on the time of day and the testing method (blood, urine, or saliva), but generally, a healthy individual will have cortisol levels between 10-20 mcg/dL in the early morning (6-8 am) and 3-10 mcg/dL around 4 pm

    It will be measured at the beginning, middle, and end of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

  • Heart Rate Variability

    Player Heart Rate Variability During the Return-to-Play Process. Ouraring device. Interpreting HRV Scores: High HRV (e.g., 70 or higher): Associated with good health, a balanced autonomic nervous system, and better adaptability. Moderate HRV (e.g., 50-70): May indicate a need for improvement in areas like sleep, stress management, or nutrition. Low HRV (e.g., below 50): May indicate increased risk of health problems and a need for addressing underlying issues.

    It will be measured at the beginning, middle, and end of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Age

    It will be measured and registered in the data base at the beginning of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

  • History of previous muscle injuries in the same muscle.

    It will be determined and registered in the data base at the beginning of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

  • Type of tissue involved in the muscle injury.

    It will be determined and registered in the data base at the beginning of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

  • The estimated medical prognosis of the player's discharge.

    It will be determined and registered in the data base at the beginning of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

  • Weight

    It will be measured and registered in the data base at the beginning of the return-to-play process. This will be done for all subjects (muscle injuries) included in the study during the three years of the trial.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The intervention group: Subjects with muscle injuries who are assigned to this group will follow a return-to-play program with a progressive design.

Other: Return to play program with progressive design

Control Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Control Group: The subjects (muscle injuries) that are assigned to this group will follow a Return to Play program with regressive design.

Other: Return to play program with regressive design

Interventions

This design has more open objectives than the regressive design. In the progressive design, the duration of the return-to-play program is not determined by a future date, but rather by the player's daily progress. This design is less commonly used for scheduling tasks and planning work. It is intended to be compared with the regressive design to determine which is more appropriate.

Also known as: IG
Intervention Group

Control Group: Subjects with muscle injuries assigned to this group will follow a Return to Play program with a regressive design. This design has fixed times and objectives from the beginning of the program to predict the athlete's exact discharge time. This design is commonly used for scheduling tasks and planning work. It is intended to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of the design and compare them with those of the progressive design to determine which is more appropriate.

Also known as: CG
Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsThe study will only include injuries to male soccer players.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male soccer players.
  • Diagnosed with a muscle injury via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during the three year study period.
  • They will all belong to the same club.
  • Age will be between 18 and 40 years old.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients (Muscle injuries) that do not cause players to miss training or competitions.
  • Patients voluntarily decide not to participate in the study or abandon the RTP process due to transfers or other exceptional causes.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Balearic Islands

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07010, Spain

Location

Related Publications (30)

  • Orchard JW, Chaker Jomaa M, Orchard JJ, Rae K, Hoffman DT, Reddin T, Driscoll T. Fifteen-week window for recurrent muscle strains in football: a prospective cohort of 3600 muscle strains over 23 years in professional Australian rules football. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Sep;54(18):1103-1107. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100755. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

  • Dhillon H, Dhillon S, Dhillon MS. Current Concepts in Sports Injury Rehabilitation. Indian J Orthop. 2017 Sep-Oct;51(5):529-536. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_226_17.

  • Dattilo M, Antunes HKM, Galbes NMN, Monico-Neto M, DE Sa Souza H, Dos Santos Quaresma MVL, Lee KS, Ugrinowitsch C, Tufik S, DE Mello MT. Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Acute Skeletal Muscle Recovery after Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Feb;52(2):507-514. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002137.

  • Tabor J, La P, Kline G, Wang M, Bonfield S, Machan M, Wynne-Edwards K, Emery C, Debert C. Saliva Cortisol as a Biomarker of Injury in Youth Sport-Related Concussion. J Neurotrauma. 2023 Feb;40(3-4):296-308. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0190. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

  • Gomez-Espejo V, Olmedilla A, Abenza-Cano L, Garcia-Mas A, Ortega E. Psychological readiness to return to sports practice and risk of recurrence: Case studies. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:905816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905816. eCollection 2022.

  • Orchard J, Best TM, Verrall GM. Return to play following muscle strains. Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Nov;15(6):436-41. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000188206.54984.65.

  • Hoy MK, Stache S Jr, Roedl JB. Hamstring Injuries: A Paradigm for Return to Play. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2024 Apr;28(2):119-129. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1778027. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

  • Wong S, Ning A, Lee C, Feeley BT. Return to sport after muscle injury. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Jun;8(2):168-75. doi: 10.1007/s12178-015-9262-2.

  • Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.

  • Pollock N, James SL, Lee JC, Chakraverty R. British athletics muscle injury classification: a new grading system. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(18):1347-51. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093302. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

  • Hagglund M, Walden M, Ekstrand J. Previous injury as a risk factor for injury in elite football: a prospective study over two consecutive seasons. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Sep;40(9):767-72. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.026609. Epub 2006 Jul 19.

  • Papacosta E, Nassis GP. Saliva as a tool for monitoring steroid, peptide and immune markers in sport and exercise science. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Sep;14(5):424-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

  • Svensson T, Madhawa K, Nt H, Chung UI, Svensson AK. Validity and reliability of the Oura Ring Generation 3 (Gen3) with Oura sleep staging algorithm 2.0 (OSSA 2.0) when compared to multi-night ambulatory polysomnography: A validation study of 96 participants and 421,045 epochs. Sleep Med. 2024 Mar;115:251-263. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.01.020. Epub 2024 Jan 26.

  • Palsson TS, Rubio-Peiroten A, Domenech-Garcia V. Sleep deprivation increases pain sensitivity following acute muscle soreness. Sleep Med. 2023 Sep;109:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Jun 24.

  • Lowe B, Decker O, Muller S, Brahler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, Herzberg PY. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093.

  • Vileikyte L. Stress and wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.005.

  • Salom J. Readaptación tas las lesiones deportivas, tratamiento multidisciplinar basado en la evidencia. Madrid: Ed. Panamericana; 2020. ISBN 9788491103967

    RESULT
  • Chia L, Taylor D, Pappas E, Hegedus EJ, Michener LA. Beginning With the End in Mind: Implementing Backward Design to Improve Sports Injury Rehabilitation Practices. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Dec;52(12):770-776. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.11440.

  • Isern-Kebschull J, Pedret C, Mecho S, Pruna R, Alomar X, Yanguas X, Valle X, Kassarjian A, Martinez J, Tomas X, Rodas G. MRI findings prior to return to play as predictors of reinjury in professional athletes: a novel decision-making tool. Insights Imaging. 2022 Dec 27;13(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01341-1.

  • Delvaux F, Rochcongar P, Bruyere O, Bourlet G, Daniel C, Diverse P, Reginster JY, Croisier JL. Return-to-play criteria after hamstring injury: actual medicine practice in professional soccer teams. J Sports Sci Med. 2014 Sep 1;13(3):721-3. eCollection 2014 Sep. No abstract available.

  • Miller MD, Arciero RA, Cooper DE, Johnson DL, Best TM. Doc, when can he go back in the game? Instr Course Lect. 2009;58:437-43.

  • Creighton DW, Shrier I, Shultz R, Meeuwisse WH, Matheson GO. Return-to-play in sport: a decision-based model. Clin J Sport Med. 2010 Sep;20(5):379-85. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181f3c0fe.

  • Matheson GO, Shultz R, Bido J, Mitten MJ, Meeuwisse WH, Shrier I. Return-to-play decisions: are they the team physician's responsibility? Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Jan;21(1):25-30. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182095f92.

  • Lempainen L, Mecho S, Valle X, Mazzoni S, Villalon J, Freschi M, Stefanini L, Garcia-Romero-Perez A, Burova M, Pleshkov P, Pruna R, Pasta G, Kosola J. Management of anterior thigh injuries in soccer players: practical guide. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Mar 18;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00428-y.

  • Balius R, Pedret C. Lesiones musculares en el deporte. Barcelona: Ed. Panamericana; 2013. EAN: 9788498357035

    RESULT
  • Ekstrand J, Hagglund M, Walden M. Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer). Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1226-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546510395879. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

  • Kristenson K, Bjorneboe J, Walden M, Andersen TE, Ekstrand J, Hagglund M. Injuries in male professional football: A prospective comparison between individual and team-based exposure registration. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Oct;26(10):1225-32. doi: 10.1111/sms.12551. Epub 2015 Sep 17.

  • Rogers DL, Tanaka MJ, Cosgarea AJ, Ginsburg RD, Dreher GM. How Mental Health Affects Injury Risk and Outcomes in Athletes. Sports Health. 2024 Mar-Apr;16(2):222-229. doi: 10.1177/19417381231179678. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

  • Pruna, Ricard. "Return to play: ¿Hacia dónde vamos? Esto no es un juego de adivinanzas". Apunts: Medicina de l'esport, 2016, vol.VOL 51, núm. 191, p. 109-12

    RESULT
  • Pedret Carles, Balius Ramon. Lesiones musculares en el deporte. Actualización de un artículo del Dr. Cabot, publicado en Apuntes de Medicina Deportiva en 1965. Apunts. Medicina de l'Esport.. 2015;50. 10.1016

    RESULT

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Olga Velasco, Phd Physio

    University of Balearic Islands

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Oscar Vicente, PhD Stud.

CONTACT

Carles Pedret, PhD MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a randomized, double-blind, single-center controlled clinical trial. There will be two groups: a control group and an intervention group. The study will be carried out in the work environment of the principal investigator and doctoral student at the University of the Balearic Islands (UIB) and Club Atlético de Madrid. The study will focus on the first and B teams, which are based at the Ciudad Deportiva del Cerro del Espino in Majadahonda, Madrid. The study will be included in the principal investigator's doctoral thesis.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2025

First Posted

June 10, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 3, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

June 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

As part of a doctoral program's research plan, this essay's IPD will be shared with the thesis directors. The IPD is confidential and is only for this research.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The IPD will be shared at the midpoint of the trial as part of the preliminary statistical analysis and at the end of the trial for the final statistical analysis and writing of the results and conclusions. The IPD will be coded using the patient code; therefore, there is no possibility of data exposure.
Access Criteria
The principal investigator, the student in the Ph.D. program, the two thesis supervisors from the University of the Balearic Islands, and the group of statisticians from the same university who are in charge of the statistical analysis will have access to the IPD.

Locations