Induction of Labor After Cesarean Using Foley Alone vs. Concurrent Foley and Oxytocin
LIFT
Labor Induction After Cesarean: A Randomized Trial Of Cervical Balloon With or Without Oxytocin
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized trial of patients undergoing a term (≥37 weeks) induction of labor with a history of one prior Cesarean delivery, wherein the provider intends to use a Foley catheter for cervical ripening. The investigators will be comparing Foley alone with concurrent Foley and Oxytocin use at the start of the induction. With this trial, the investigators aim to test our central hypothesis that concurrent Foley and Oxytocin will decrease time to delivery without increasing risks, compared to Foley alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 5, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
July 18, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.8 years
May 27, 2025
July 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to delivery
The primary endpoint will be time from start of induction until delivery (hours)
At delivery
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Estimated postpartum blood loss
At delivery
Postpartum hemorrhage
Within 6 weeks of delivery
Number of Participants with Chorioamnionitis
At delivery
Mode of delivery
At delivery
Number of Participants with Uterine Rupture
At delivery
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Concurrent Foley balloon and Oxytocin
EXPERIMENTALCervical ripening will begin with a Foley balloon and concurrent oxytocin, started within 2 hour of balloon placement
Foley balloon alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORCervical ripening will begin with a Foley balloon alone. Oxytocin will not be started until the balloon is removed or expelled, though can be considered if the balloon remains in place for \>8 hours
Interventions
Foley balloon for induction of labor
Pitocin for induction of labor
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible for induction of labor
- Live singleton gestation ≥37 weeks
- History of 1 cesarean delivery
- ≥18 years of age
- Cephalic presentation
- Intact membranes
- English or Spanish speaking (Able to read/understand consent and instructions)
- Cervical dilation \<3cm and Bishop score \<8
You may not qualify if:
- \>1 prior Cesarean delivery
- Known chorioamnionitis
- Major fetal anomaly
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, United States
Related Publications (18)
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
PMID: 18929686BACKGROUNDHollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):670-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670.
PMID: 10480822BACKGROUNDSchulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
PMID: 20332509BACKGROUNDLevine LD, Downes KL, Hamm RF, Srinivas SK. Evaluating the impact of a standardized induction protocol to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Oct;34(19):3200-3207. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1680629. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
PMID: 31645154BACKGROUNDCommittee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):e168-e186. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351.
PMID: 28937571BACKGROUNDJamaluddin A, Azhary JMK, Hong JGS, Hamdan M, Tan PC. Early versus delayed amniotomy with immediate oxytocin after Foley catheter cervical ripening in multiparous women with labor induction: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;160(2):661-669. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14361. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
PMID: 35869943BACKGROUNDGomez Slagle HB, Fonge YN, Caplan R, Pfeuti CK, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):724.e1-724.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1368. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
PMID: 35135684BACKGROUNDSecchi D, Alberic J, Gobillot S, Ghenassia A, Roustit M, Chauleur C, Hoffmann P, Raia-Barjat T. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix: a multicenter, retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Aug;306(2):379-387. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06298-y. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
PMID: 34708257BACKGROUNDHoffman MK, Hunter Grant G. Induction of labor in women with a prior cesarean delivery. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):471-4. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
PMID: 26365010BACKGROUNDWest HM, Jozwiak M, Dodd JM. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 9;6(6):CD009792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub3.
PMID: 28599068BACKGROUNDKehl S, Weiss C, Rath W. Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Sep;204:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
PMID: 27521597BACKGROUNDLevin G, Tsur A, Burke YZ, Meyer R. Methods of induction of labor after cesarean with no prior vaginal delivery-Perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;160(2):612-619. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14318. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
PMID: 35751576BACKGROUNDLandon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
PMID: 15598960BACKGROUNDDeshmukh U, Denoble AE, Son M. Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: an expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S783-S803. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.030. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
PMID: 38462257BACKGROUNDACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5. No abstract available.
PMID: 19623003BACKGROUNDBruno AM, Allshouse AA, Metz TD. Trends in Attempted and Successful Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in the United States From 2010 to 2020. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):173-175. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004998. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
PMID: 36701618BACKGROUNDACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e110-e127. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078.
PMID: 30681543BACKGROUNDStephenson J. Rate of First-time Cesarean Deliveries on the Rise in the US. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jul 1;3(7):e222824. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2824. No abstract available.
PMID: 36219002BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lisa Levine, MD MSCE
University of Pennsylvania
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2025
First Posted
June 5, 2025
Study Start
July 10, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share